Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Publisher:
Cambridge University Press
Online publication date:
December 2012
Print publication year:
2012
Online ISBN:
9780511979149

Book description

PowerPoint has become an integral part of academic and professional life across the globe. In this book, Hubert Knoblauch offers the first complete analysis of the PowerPoint presentation as a form of communication. Knoblauch charts the diffusion of PowerPoint and explores its significance as a ubiquitous and influential element of contemporary communication culture. His analysis considers the social and intellectual implications of the genre, focusing on the dynamic relationships between the aural, visual and physical dimensions of PowerPoint presentations, as well as the diverse institutional contexts in which these presentations take place. Ultimately, Knoblauch argues that the parameters of the PowerPoint genre frames the ways in which information is presented, validated and absorbed, with ambiguous consequences for the acquisition and transmission of knowledge. This original and timely book is relevant to scholars of communications, sociology and education.

Reviews

'… The book is intended for an academic audience with an interest in understanding how knowledge is created via powerpoint. … Knoblauch’s book is an extensive and in-depth investigation into why powerpoint has become the de facto presentation style.... This book is a first step to fully understanding a means of communication that is exploding in use.'

Kimberly Fairchild Kimberly Fairchild Source: PsycCRITIQUES

'On the whole, this is a significant work which examines the globally important phenomenon of PowerPoint - and powerpoint - in a context that is highly meaningful for sociological theory … The study is not just about the software and related performances but also about the contemporary development of information and knowledge society, which has been a major social and cultural change across the globe. The analysis is also pertinent to the classic questions concerning human action that have captivated the greatest sociological thinkers … the overall quality and significance make it a valuable piece of sociological scholarship.'

Stanisław Krawczyk Source: State of Affairs

Refine List

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
×

Contents

References

1962 Oxford Illustrated Dictionary, Oxford: Oxford at Clarendon.
1995 Cambridge International Dictionary of English, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Adams, S. 1994 Always Postpone Meetings with Time-Wasting Morons, Kansas City, MO: Andrews & Mcmeel.
Adler, R. B. and Elmhorst, J. M. 1996 Communicating at Work: Principles and Practices for Business and the Professions 5th ed., New York: McGraw-Hill.
Ahmed, C. 1998 “Powerpoint versus Traditional Overheads: Which Is More Effective for Learning?” Available at: http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED429037 (Accessed March 21, 2011).
Amann, K. and Knorr Cetina, K. D. 1988The Fixation of Visual Evidence,” Human Studies 11: 133–69.
Antunes, P., Costa, C. J., and Pino, J. A. 2006The Use of Genre Analysis in the Design of Electronic Meeting Systems,” Information Research 11: 3.
Atkinson, C. 2007 Beyond Bullet Points: Using Microsoft® Office PowerPoint® 2007 to Create Presentations That Inform, Motivate, and Inspire, Redmond, WA: Microsoft Press.
Atkinson, M. 1982 “Understanding Formality.” British Journal of Sociology, 33: 322–45.
Atkinson, M. 1984 Our Masters’ Voices, London: Methuen.
Atkinson, P. and Silverman, D. 1997 “Kundera’s Immortality: The Interview Society and the Invention of the Self,” Qualitative Inquiry 3(3): 304–25.
Auslander, P. 1999 Liveness: Performance in a Mediatized Culture, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Austin, D., Rudkin, T. and Gaskins, R. 1986 “Presenter Specification,” Forethought Inc.
Bajaj, G. 2008 “An Interview with Richard Bretschneider.” Available at: www.indezine.com (Accessed June 15, 2010).
Bartsch, R. A. and Cobern, Kristi M. (2003) “Effectiveness of PowerPoint Presentations in Lectures,” Computers & Education 41(1): 77–86.
Bateman, J. A. 2008 Multimodality and Genre: A Foundation for the Systematic Analysis of Multimodal Documents, London: Houndmills.
Baumann, R. and Briggs, C. L. 1990Poetics and Performance as Critical Perspectives in Language and Social Life,” Annual Review of Anthropology 19: 59–88.
Bazerman, C. 1995 “Systems of Genres and Enactment of Social Intentions” in A. Freedman and P. Medway (eds) Genre and New Rhetoric, London: Taylor and Francis.
Bellamy, K. and Mclean, D. 2003The Mechanics of PowerPoint,” Journal of Audiovisual Media in Medicine 26(2): 47–78.
Berger, P. L. and Luckmann, T. 1966 The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge 1st ed., New York: Doubleday.
Betz, G. and Hitzler, R. 2011 “Steuerung komplexser Projekte. Zur Institutionellen Einbindung urbaner Mega-Event-Organisationen” in G. Betz, R. Hitzler, and Michaela Pfadenhauer (eds) Urbane Events, Wiesbaden: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
Biber, D., Finegan, E., Biber, D. and Finegan, E. 1994 “Introduction” in Sociolinguistic Perspectives on Registers, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bijker, W. E. 1995 Of Bicycles, Bakelites, and Bulbs: Toward a Theory of Sociotechnical Change, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Blokzijl, W. and Andeweg, B. 2005 “The Effects of Text Slide Format and Presentational Quality on Learning in College Lectures.” Available at: http://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/IPCC.2005.1494188 (Accessed June 20, 2010).
Blokzijl, W. and Naeff, R. 2004The Instructor as Stagehand: Dutch Student Responses to PowerPoint,” Business Communication Quarterly 67(1): 70–7.
Boltanski, L. and Chiapello, È. 1999 Le nouvel esprit du capitalisme, Paris: Gallimard.
Bolte, A., Neumer, J. and Porschen, S. 2008 Die alltägliche Last der Kooperation: Abstimmung als Arbeit und das Ende der Meeting-Euphorie, Berlin: Edition Sigma.
Brenden, A. and Goodhue, J. 2005 The Lawyer’s Guide to Creating Persuasive Computer Presentations, Chicago: American Bar Association.
Brinkschulte, M. 2008 “Bericht zum funktionalen Folieneinsatz beim Argumentieren in Powerpoint-Präsentationen,” Manuscript Berlin, Technical University.
Brinkschulte, M. 2007 “Lokaldeiktische Prozeduren als Mittler zwischen Rede und Powerpoint-Präsentation in Vorlesungen” in B. Schnettler, H. Knoblauch (eds.) Powerpoint-Präsentationen: Neue Formen der gesellschaftlichen Kommunikation von Wissen, Konstanz: UVK.
Brooks, J. 2004 Presentations as Rites: Co-Presence and Visible Images for Organization Memory Collectivity, Ann Arbor:University of Michigan.
Bühler, K. 1982 Sprachtheorie202F: Die Darstellungsfunktion der Sprache Ungekürzter Neudr. d. Ausg. Jena, Fischer, 1934, Stuttgart, New York: Fischer.
Bumiller, E. 2010We Have Met the Enemy and He Is PowerPoint,” New York Times, April 24, 2010.
Burchfield, R. W. (ed.) 1982 A Supplement to the Oxford English Dictionary, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Byrne, D. 2003 Imagining Emotional Epistemological Information, New York: Todomundo.
Carney, B. and Feigenson, N. 2004Visual Persuasion in the Michael Skakel Trial: Enhancing Advocacy through Interactive Media Presentations,” Criminal Justice 19(1): 22–35.
Castells, M. 2009 Communication Power, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
Castells, M. 1996 The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture: The Rise of the Network Society, Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.
Couldry, N. 2008Mediatization or Mediation? Alternative Understandings of the Emergent Space of Digital Storytelling,” New Media and Society 10(3): 372–93.
Crane, D. 1992 The Production of Culture: Media and Urban Arts, Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Daston, L. and Galison, P. 2007 Objectivity, New York: Zone Books.
DiMaggio, P. and Powell, W. W. 1983The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality Inorganizational Fields,” American Sociological Review 48: 147–60.
Dordick, H. S. and Wang, G. 1993 The Information Society: A Retrospective View, Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Dreyer, K. J. 2001Special Report. Using Microsoft PowerPoint for Electronic Presentations,” Radiographics: The Journal of Continuing Medical Education in Radiology 21(5): 1318–21.
Duarte, N. 2008 Slide:ology: The Art and Science of Presentation Design, Cambridge: O’Reilly.
Ebrain Market Research 2002 Electronic Market Data Book, Arlington, VA: Consumer Electronics Association.
Ekman, P. and Friesen, W. V. 1969The repertoire of nonverbal behavior,” Semiotica 1: 63–8.
Engleberg, I. N. and Daly, J. A. 2005 Presentations in Everyday Life: Strategies for Effective Speaking, Boston, New York: Houghton Mifflin.
Erickson, F. 2011Uses of Video in Social Research. A Brief History,” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 14(3): 179–89.
Essex-Lopresti, M. 2003Using PowerPoint,” Journal of Audiovisual Media in Medicine 26(2): 79.
Farkas, D. K. 2006Toward a Better Understanding of Powerpoint Deck Design,” Information Design Journal/Dokument Design 14(2): 161–71.
Feldman, T. 2002The Intersection of Powerpoint and Interventional Cardiology,” Catheterization and Cardiovascular Diagnosis 57(3): 412.
Fenich, G. 2008 Meetings, Expositions, Events, and Conventions: An Introduction to the Industry, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Prentice Hall.
Fischer, J. and Delitz (eds) 2009 Die Architektur der Gesellschaft, Bielefeld: transcript.
Foucault, M. 1995 Diszipline and Punishment: The Birth of the Prison, New York: Vintage.
Fox, C. J. 1983 Information and Misinformation: An Investigation of the Notions of Information, Misinformation, Informing, and Misinforming, London: Greenwood.
Friedhoff, R. M. 1991 The Second Computer Revolution: Visualization, New York: Free Press.
Gabriel, Y. 2008Against the Tyranny of PowerPoint: Technology-in-Use and Technology Abuse,” Organization Studies 29(2): 255–76.
Garfinkel, H. 1967 Studies in Ethnomethodology, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Gaskins, R. 2009 “Homepage of Robert Gaskin.” Available at: www.robertgaskin.com (Accessed January 20, 2010).
Giddens, A. 1984 The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration, Berkeley: University of California Press.
Giedeon, S. 1987 Die Herrschaft der Mechanisierung, Frankfurt: Athenäum.
Glaser, B. and Strauss, A. 1967 The Discovery of Grounded Theory, Chicago: Aldine.
Goffman, E. 1963 Behavior in Public Places: Notes in the Social Organization of Gatherings, New York: Free Press.
Goffman, E. 1967 “Embarrassment and Social Organization” in E. Goffman (ed.) Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behavior, Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.
Goffman, E. 1981a Forms of Talk, London: Blackwell.
Goffman, E. 1974 Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience, New York: Harper & Row.
Goffman, E. 1981b “The Interaction Order,” American Sociological Review 48: 1–17.
Goffman, E. 1980 The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life, Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Goodwin, C. 1986Audience Diversity, Participation and Interpretation,” Text 6(3): 283–316.
Grady, J. 2006 “Edward Tufte and the Promise of Visual Social Science” in L. Pauwels (ed.) Visual Cultures of Science: Rethinking Representational Practices in Knowledge Building and Science Communication, Lebanon, NH: Darthmouth University Press.
Griffin, R. E. 1995 “Electronic Presentations in the Corporation: How Are They Being Used?” Available at: http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED391523 (Accessed April 14, 2011).
Gumperz, J. 1992 “Contextualization Revisited” in A. di Luzio and P. Auer (eds) The Contextualization of Language, Amsterdam and Philadelphia: Benjamins.
Gumperz, J. 1981 Discourse Strategies, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Günthner, S. and Knoblauch, H. 1995Culturally Patterned Speaking Practices – the Analysis of Communicative Genres,” Pragmatics 5: 1–32.
Habermas, J. 1981 Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns, Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp.
Halazonetis, D. J. 2000Advanced Powerpoint Animation Techniques: Part I,” American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 117(6): 737–40.
Hanke, J. 1998Survey Offers Glimpse of the Average Presenter,” Presentations 13: 6.
Hanks, W. F. 1990 Referential Practice: Language and Lived Space among the Maya, Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Haviland, J. B. 1993Anchoring, Iconicity, and Orientation in Guugu Yimithirr Pointing Gestures,” Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 3(1): 3–45.
Heath, C. 1986 Body Movement and Speech in Medical Interaction, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Heath, C., Hindmarsh, J. and Luff, P. 2010 Video in Qualitative Research, London: Sage.
Heath, C. and Knoblauch, H. 1999Technologie, Interaktion und Organisation: Die Workplace Studies,” Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Soziologie 25(2): 163–81.
Heath, C. and Luff, P. 2000 Technology in Action, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Heath, C., Luff, P. and Knoblauch, H. 2000Technology and Social Interaction: The Emergence of ‘Workplace Studies,’British Journal of Sociology 51(2): 299–320.
Hendricks, W., Holliday, M., Mobley, R. and Steinbrecher, K. 1996 Secrets of Power Presentations, Franklin Lakes, NJ: Career Press.
Hensel, M. 1990 Die Informationsgesellschaft: Neuere Ansätze zur Analyse eines Schlagwortes, München: Fischer.
Heritage, J. and Watson, R. 1979 “Formulations as Conversational Objects” in G. Psathas (ed.) Everyday Language: Ethnomethodological Approaches, New York: Free Press.
Hindmarsh, J. and Heath, C. 2000Embodied Reference: A Study of Deixis in Workplace Interaction,” Journal of Pragmatics 32: 1855–78.
Holland, W. P. 1921 Business Statistics: Their Preparation, Compilation and Presentation, London, New York: Pitman.
Hornidge, A.-K. 2007 Knowledge Society: Vision and Social Construction of Reality in Germany and Singapore, Berlin: LIT.
Howell, W. S. and Bormann, E. G. 1988 The Process of Presentational Speaking 2nd ed., New York: Harper & Row.
Hughes, S. 1980 Professional Presentations: Practical Guide to the Preparation and Performance of Successful Business Presentations, Sydney: McGraw-Hill.
HVS 2007 Convention, Sports & Entertainment Facilities Consulting, Chicago: Tinley Park Convention Market Study. Available at: http://www.tinleypark.org/documents (Accessed May 12, 2010).
Hymes, D. 1974 Foundations in Sociolinguistics: An Ethnographic Perspective, Philadelphia: University of Philadelphia Press.
ICCC 2002 The International Meetings Association: The International Meetings Market 1994–2003, Amsterdam: ICCA.
International Telecommunications Union 2009 Measuring the Information Society: ICT Development Index, Geneva: ITU.
Isaacs, W. 1993Taking Flight: Dialogue, Collective Thinking, and Organizational Learning,” Organizational Dynamics 1: 61–83.
Jefferson, G. 1973A Case of Precision Timing in Ordinary Conversation: Overlapped Tag-Position Address Terms in Closing Sequences,” Semiotica IX: 47–96.
Jefferson, G. 1990 “List Construction as a Task and Interactional Resource” in G. Psathas and R. Frankel (eds) Interactional Competence, New York: Irvington.
Jefferson, G. 1972 “Side Sequences,” in D. Sudnow (ed.) Studies in Social Interaction, New York: Free Press.
Jefferson, G. 1979 “A Technique for Inviting Laughter and Its Subsequent Acceptance Declination” in Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology, New York: Irvington.
Jefferson, G. 1984 “Transcription Notation” in J. M. Atkinson and J. Heritage (eds) Structures of Social Action, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Joffe, J. 2007An die Wand geworfen,” Die Zeit 31: 42.
Jolles, A. 1982 Einfache Formen, Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Kaplan, S. 2010 “Strategy and Powerpoint: An Inquiry into the Epistemic Culture and Machinery of Strategy Making.” Available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1569762. (Accessed June 12, 2010).
Katz, J. 1999 How Emotions Work, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Keller, J. 2003Is PowerPoint the Devil?Chicago Tribune, 5.
Kellner, D. 2006Media Culture and the Triumph of the Spectacle,” Fast Capitalism 1.1(15). Available at: http://fastcapitalism.com. (Accessed June 12, 2010).
Kendon, A. 2004 Gesture: Visible Action as Utterance, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kendon, A. 1990Spatial Organization in Social Encounters: The F-Formation System,” Conducting Interaction: Patterns of Behavior in Focused Encounters: 209–38.
Keppler, A. 1985 Präsentation und Information” Zur politischen Berichterstattung im Fernsehen, Tübingen: Narr.
Keyton, J. 2005 Communication and Organizational Culture, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Kim, D. 1993The Link between Individual and Organizational Learning,” Sloan Management Review 1993: 37–50.
Kjeldsen, J. E. 2006The Rhetoric of PowerPoint,” Seminar-NetInternational Journal of Media, Technology and Lifelong Learning 2: 1–17.
Knape, J. 2007 “Powerpoint in rhetoriktheoretischer Sicht” in H. Knoblauch and B. Schnettler (eds) Powerpoint-Präsentationen. Neue Formen der gesellschaftlichen Kommunikation von Wissen, Konstanz: UVK.
Knoblauch, H. 2001 “Communication, Contexts and Culture: A Communicative Constructivist Approach to Intercultural Communication” in A. d. Luzio, S. Günthner, and F. Orletti (eds) Culture in Communication: Analyses of Intercultural Situations, Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Knoblauch, H. 1995 Kommunikationskultur: Die kommunikative Konstruktion kultureller Kontexte, Berlin, New York: De Gruyter.
Knoblauch, H. 1987‘Lacht euch gesund, bei mir ist lustige Werbung’: Die Rhetorik von Werbeveranstaltungen bei Kaffeefahrten,” Zeitschrift für Soziologie 16(2): 127–44.
Knoblauch, H. 2008The Performance of Knowledge: Pointing and Knowledge in Powerpoint Presentations,” Cultural Sociology 2(1): 75–97.
Knoblauch, H. 2009 Populäre Religion, Frankfurt/Main: Campus.
Knoblauch, H. 1990 “The Taming of Foes: Informal Discussions in Family Talk” in I. Markova and K. Foppa (eds) Asymmetries in Dialogue, New York:Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Knoblauch, H. 2006 “Videography: Focused Ethnography and Video-Analysis” in H. Knoblauch, B. Schnettler, J. Raab, and H.-G. Soeffner (eds) Video Analysis – Methodology and Methods: Qualitative Audiovisual Data Analysis in Sociology, Frankfurt/Main, New York: Lang.
Knoblauch, H. 2005 Wissenssoziologie 2. rev. ed., Konstanz: UVK.
Knoblauch, H. and Luckmann, T. 2004 “Genre Analysis” in U. Flick, E. v. Kardoff, and I. Steinke (eds) A Companion to Qualitative Research, London: Sage.
Knoblauch, H. and Tuma, R. 2011 “Videography: An Interpretive Approach to Video-Recorded Micro-Social Interaction” in E. Margolis and L. Pauwels (eds) The Sage Handbook of Visual Methods, Los Angeles: Sage.
Knorr Cetina, K. D. 1999 Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Knorr Cetina, K. D. 2001 “Postsocial Relations: Theorizing Sociality in a Postsocial Environment” in G. Ritzer and B. Smart (eds) Handbook of Social Theory, London: Sage.
Knorr Cetina, K. D. and Cicourel, A. V. (eds) 1981 “Advances in Social Theory and Methodology” in Advances in Social Theory and Methodology: Toward an Integration of Micro and Macro Sociology, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Kress, G. 2003 Literacy in the New Media Age, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Kress, G. 2010 Multimodalit: A Social Semiotic Approach to Contemporary Communication, London, New York: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Kress, G. and Leeuwen, T. 1996 Reading Images. The Grammar of Visual Design, London, New York: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Krotz, F. 2001 Die Mediatisierung kommunikativen Handelns, Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag.
Kuhlen, R. 1995 Informationsmarkt: Chancen und Risiken der Kommerzialisierung des Wissens, Konstanz: UVK.
Ladkin, A. and Spiller, J. 2000 The Meetings, Incentives, Conferences and Exhibitions Industry, London: Travel & Tourist Intelligence.
Lang, A. 2000A Limited Capacity Model of Mediated Message Processing,” Journal of Communication 50: 46–70.
Lange, V. 2004 Meeting Madness, Darmstadt: Steinkopff.
LaPorte, R. E., Linkov, F., Villasenor, T., Sauer, F., Gamboa, C., Lovelekar, M., Shubnikov, E. and Sekikwa, A. 2002Papyrus to Powerpoint: Metamorphosis of Scientific Communication,” British Medical Journal 325: 1478–81.
Latour, B. 1994On Technical Mediation – Philosophy, Sociology, Genealogy,” Common Knowledge 3(2): 29–64.
Latour, B. 2008 Re-Assembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network Theory, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Latour, B. 1993 We Have Never Been Modern, New York: Prentice Hall.
Lechner, F. and Boli, J. 2005 World Culture: Origins and Consequences, Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Lencioni, P. 2004 Death by Meeting – a Leadership Fable about Solving the Most Painful Problem in Business, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Levasseur, D. and Sawyer, K. 2006Pedagogy Meets Powerpoint: A Research Review of the Effects of Computer-Generated Slides in the Classroom,” Review of Communication 6(1–2): 101–23.
Licklider, J. C. R. and Taylor, R. W. 1968The Computer as a Communication Device,” Science and Technology 76: 21–31.
Liebert, W.-A. 2005 “Präsentationsrhetorik,” in Historisches Wörterbuch der Rhetorik, vol. 7. Tubingen: Max Niemeyer, 32–9.
Lobin, H. 2009 Inszeniertes Reden auf der Medienbühne: Zur Linguistik und Rhetorik der wissenschaftlichen Präsentation, Frankfurt/Main: Campus.
Lofland, J. 1971 Analyzing Social Settings: A Guide to Qualitative Observation and Analysis, Belmond, CA: Wadsworth.
Lorenzen, J. 2010 Powerpoint-Präsentationen in der Schule: Eine gattungsanalytische Fallstudie zur neuen Kommunikationsform der Wissensgesellschaft. Diploma Thesis. Berlin: Technical University.
Lorenzen, J. and Degenhardt, F. 2008 “Bericht zur Publikumsgruppe, AG Interaktionen,” Berlin: Technical University (Manuscript).
Lowry, R. B. 1999Electronic Presentation of Lecture – Effect upon Student Performance,” University Chemistry Education 3(1): 18–21.
Luckmann, T. 1985 “The Analysis of Communicative Genres” in B. F. Nell, R. Singh, and V. M. Venter (eds) Focus on Quality: Selected Proceedings of a Conference on Qualitative Research Methodology in the Social Sciences, Durban: Institute for Social and Economic Research.
Luckmann, T. 1972 “Die Konstitution der Sprache in der Welt des Alltags” in B. Badura and K. Gloy (eds) Soziologie der Kommunikation, Stuttgart, Bad Cannstadt: Fromann Holzboog.
Luckmann, T. 2003 “Moralizing Sermons, Then and Now” in R. Fenn (ed.) The Blackwell Companion: The Sociology of Religion, New York: Blackwell.
Luckmann, T. and Keppler, A. 1991 “‘Teaching’: Conversational Transmission of Knowledge” in I. Markova and K. Foppa (eds) Asymmetries in Dialogue, New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Luhmann, N. 1984 Soziale Systeme, Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp.
Lundby, K. 2009 Mediatization: Concept, Changes, Consequences, New York: Lang.
Lynch, M. and Woolgar, S. 1990 Representation in Scientific Practice, Cambridge: Kluwer.
Machlup, F. 1962 The Production and Distribution of Knowledge in the United States, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Mackert, M. and Degenhardt, F. 2007 “Ein Bild sagt mehr als tausend Worte: Die Präsentation als kommunikative Gattung” in B. Schnettler and H. Knoblauch (eds) Powerpoint-Präsentationen: Neue Formen der gesellschaftlichen Kommunikation von Wissen, Konstanz: UVK.
Mantei, E. J. 2000Using Internet Class Notes and PowerPoint in the Physical Geology Lecture,” Journal of College Science Teaching 29(5): 301–5.
Mattelart, M. 2003 An Introduction to Information Society, London: Sage.
Mead, M. and Byres, P. 1968 The Small Conference: An Innovation in Communication, Paris, The Hague: Mouton.
Microsoft Memo 1988 “Microsoft Memo August 8.” Available at: http://robertgaskin.com (Accessed February 6, 2009).
Mieckowski, Z. 1990 World Trends in Tourism and Recreation, New York: Lang.
Miller, C. R. 1984Genre as Social Action,” Quarterly Journal of Speech 70: 151–67.
Miller, G. A. 1956The Magical Number Seven: Some Limits on Our Capacity for Processing Information,” Psychological Review 63: 81–97.
Montgomery, R. J. and Strick, S. K. 1994 Meetings, Conventions, and Expositions: An Introduction to the Industry, New York: Wiley & Sons.
Morse, S. 1980 The Practical Approach to Business Presentations, London: Management Update.
Müller, C. 1998 Redebegleitende Gesten. Kulturgeschichte – Theorie – Sprachvergleich, Berlin: Arno Spitz.
Myerson, J. and Ross, P. 2003 The 21st Century Office, New York: Rizzoli.
Nass, C. I. 1988 “Work, Information, and Information Work” in R. L. Simpson and I. H. Simpson (eds) Research in the Sociology of Work: A Research Annual, Greenwich, CT: Jai.
Nora, S. and Minc, A. 1981 The Computerization of Society, Boston: MIT Press.
Nunberg, G. 1999The Trouble with Powerpoint – the Slide Presentation Is Costing Us Some Useful Communication Tools, like Verbs,” Fortune 140: 330–3.
Orlikowski, W. J. and Yates, J. 1994Genre Repertoires: The Structuring of Communicative Practices in Organizations,” Administrative Science Quarterly 39(4): 541–75.
Paradi, D. 2005 “What Annoys Audiences about Powerpoint Presentations.” Available at http://ezinearticles.com/?What-Annoys-Audiences-About-PowerPoint-Presentations?&id=236985
Parker, I. 2001Absolute Powerpoint – the Software That Tells You What to Think,” New Yorker, May 28, 2001: 76–87.
Parslow, G. R. 2003Multimedia in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education: Commentary: PowerPoint: An Obligatory Change,” Biochemical Education 31(1): 62–3.
Parsons, T. 1964 The Social System 2nd ed., Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
Pavio, A. 1990 Mental Representations: A Dual Coding Approach, New York: Oxford University Press.
PC Magazine 2007 “Innovators: Robert Gaskin,” PC Magazine, February 14, 2007.
Pece, G. S. 2005 The PowerPoint Society: The Influence of PowerPoint in the U.S. Government and Bureaucracy. PhD thesis. Blacksbury: Virginia State University.
Pellmann, F. 2002PowerPoint-Präsentationen im Geschichtsunterricht,” Geschichte lernen 15(89): 62–5.
Peters, S. 2007 “Projizierte Erkenntnis: Lichtbilder im Szenario des wissenschaftlichen Vortrags” in G. Boehm, G. Brandstetter, and A. Müller (eds) Figurationen: Transdisziplinäre Bildforschung, München: Fink.
Petschke, S. 2007 “Der Datenkorpus des DFG-Projektes’ ‘Die Performanz visuell unterstützter mündlicher Präsentationen’” in B. Schnettler and H. Knoblauch (eds) Powerpoint-Präsentationen: Neue Formen der gesellschaftlichen Kommunikation von Wissen, Konstanz: UVK.
Pfadenhauer, M. 2008 Organisieren: Fallstudien zum Erhandeln von Events, Wiesbaden: VS.
Pias, C. 2009 “‘Electronic Overheads’: Elemente Einer Vorgeschichte Von Powerpoint” in W. Coy and C. Pias (eds) PowerPoint: Macht und Einfluss eines Präsentationsprogrammes, Frankfurt/Main: Fischer.
Pinch, T. 2008Technology and Institutions: Living in a Material World,” Theory and Society 37: 461–83.
Pinch, T. and Bijker, W. E. 1987 “The Social Construction of Facts and Artifacts: Or How the Sociology of Science and the Sociology of Technology Might Benefit Each Other” in W. E. Bijker, T. P. Hughes, and T. Pinch (eds) The Social Construction of Technological Systems, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Porat, M. 1977 The Information Economy: Definition and Measurement, Washington, DC: OECD.
Postman, N. 1993 Technopoly: The Surrender of Culture to Technology, New York: Vintage.
Pötzsch, F. S. 2007 “Der Vollzug der Evidenz: Zur Ikonographie und Pragmatik von Powerpoint-Folien” in B. Schnettler and H. Knoblauch (eds) Powerpoint-Präsentationen: Neue Formen der gesellschaftlichen Kommunikation von Wissen, Konstanz: UVK.
Pötzsch, F. S. 2006 “Formen visuellen Wissens: Die Klassifikation und Typen der PowerPointFolie. Manuscript, Technical University of Berlin.
Power, M. 1999 The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pozzer-Ardenghi, L. and Wolff-Michael, R. 2005Photographs in Lectures: Gestures as Meaning-Making Resources,” Linguistics and Education 15: 275–93.
Rammert, W. 2006 “Die technische Konstruktion als Teil der gesellschaftlichen Konstruktion der Wirklichkeit” in D. Tänzler, H. Knoblauch, and H.-G. Soeffner (eds) Zur Kritik der Wissensgesellschaft, Konstanz: UVK.
Rammert, W. and Schulz-Schaeffer, I. 2002 “Technik und Handeln: Wenn soziales Handeln sich auf menschliches Verhalten und technische Abläufe verteilt” in W. Rammert and I. Schulz-Schaeffer (eds) Können Maschinen denken? Soziologische Beiträge zum Verhältnis von Mensch und Technik, Frankfurt/Main: Campus.
Rankin, E. L. and Hoaas, D. J. 2001The Use of PowerPoint and Student Performance,” Atlantic Economic Journal 29(1): 113.
Rapoport, A. 1994 “Spatial Organization and the Built Environment” in T. Ingold (ed.) Companion Encyclopedia of Anthropology, London, New York: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Reiser, R. A. 2001A History of Instructional Design and Technology. Part I: A History of Instructional Media,” Educational Technology, Research and Development 49: 53–64.
Rendle-Short, J. 2006 The Academic Presentation: Situated Talk in Action, Aldershot: Ashgate.
Reynolds, G. 2008 Presentation Zen: Simple Ideas on Presentation Design and Delivery, Berkeley, CA: New Riders.
Rheinsberger, H.-J. 1997 Toward a History of Epistemic Things, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Rogers, E. M. 1995 Diffusion of Innovation 4th ed., New York: Free Press.
Ruchatz, J. 2010. “Vorträgesind Silber, Dias sind Gold” in P. Boden and D. Müller (eds), Populäres Wissen im medialen Wandel seit 1850. Berlin: Kadmos.
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. and Jefferson, G. 1974 “A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking in Conversation” in J. Schenkein (ed.) Studies in the Organization of Conversational Interaction, New York: Academic Press.
Saunders, A. G. and Anderson, C. R. 1929 Business Reports: Investigation and Presentation, New York: McGraw-Hill.
Schegloff, E. 1968Sequencing in Conversational Openings,” American Anthropologist 70: 1075–95.
Schiller, H. 1989 Culture Inc.: The Corporate Takeover of Public Expression, New York: Oxford University Press.
Schnettler, B. 2006 “Orchestrating Bullet Lists and Commentaries: A Video Performance Analysis of Computer Supported Presentations” in H. Knoblauch, B. Schnettler, J. Raab, and H.-G. Soeffner (eds) Video Analysis – Methodology and Methods: Qualitative Audiovisual Data Analysis in Sociology, Frankfurt/Main, New York: Lang.
Schnettler, B. 2007 “Präsentationspannen: Risiken ritualisierter Wissenspräsentation” in R. Schlesier and U. Zellmann (eds) Ritual als provoziertes Risiko, Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann.
Schnettler, B. and Knoblauch, H. 2007 Powerpoint-Präsentationen: Neue Formen der gesellschaftlichen Kommunikation von Wissen, Konstanz: UVK.
Schnettler, B. and Tuma, R. 2007 “Pannen – Powerpoint – Performanz: Technik als‚ handelndes Drittes’ in visuell unterstützten mündlichen Präsentationen” in B. Schnettler and H. Knoblauch (eds) Powerpoint-Präsentationen: Neue Formen der gesellschaftlichen Kommunikation von Wissen, Konstanz: UVK.
Schoeneborn, D. 2008 Alternatives Considered but Not Disclosed: The Ambiguous Role of PowerPoint in Cross-Project Learning, Wiesbaden: VS.
Schultz, W. C. 1996Animation with PowerPoint: A Fog Cutter,” Journal of Educational Technology Systems 25(2): 141–60.
Schulz-Zaner, R. and Riegas-Staackmann, A. 2004 “Neue Medien im Unterricht: Eine Zwischenbilanz” in Jahrbuch der Schulentwicklung: Daten, Beispiele, Perspektiven, Weinheim, Munich: Juventa.
Schutz, A. 1962 “Common Sense and Scientific Interpretation of Human Action” in Collected Papers I, The Hague: Nijhoff.
Schutz, A. 1974 The Phenomenology of the Social World, Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
Schutz, A. 1964 “The Well-Informed Citizen” in Collected Papers. Vol. II: Studies in Social Theory, The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
Schutz, A. and Luckmann, T. 1994 Structures of the Life World II, Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
Schutz, A. and Luckmann, T. 1989 The Structures of the Life-World, Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
Schwartzman, H. B. 1989 The Meeting: Gatherings in Organizations and Communities, New York, London: Sage.
Simons, T. 2005Does Powerpoint Make You Stupid?Presentations 18: 3.
Simons, T. 2000Multimedia or Bust?”Presentations 7 (March 2000): 48–50.
Smart, L. E. and Arnold, S. 1947 Practical Rules for Graphic Presentation of Business Statistics, Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
Soeffner, H. G. 1997 The Order of Rituals: The Interpretation of Everyday Life, Translated by Mara Luckmann, New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
Sproull, L. and Kiesler, S. 1995 Connections: New Ways of Working in the Networked Organization, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Stark, D. and Paravel, V. 2008Powerpoint in Public: Digital Technologies and the New Morphology of Demonstration,” Theory, Culture & Society 25(5): 30–55.
Stehr, N. 1994 Knowledge Societies, London: Sage.
Stewart, R. 1967 Managers and Their Jobs, Basingstoke: Macmillan.
Stoner, M. 2007PowerPoint in a New Key,” Communication Education 56(3): 354–81.
Storrer, A. and Wyss, E. L. 2003 “Pfeilzeichen: Formen und Funktionen in alten und neuen Medien” in U. Schmitz and U. Wenzel (eds) Wissen und neue Medien: Bilder und Zeichen von 800 bis 2000, Berlin: Erich Schmidt.
Strauss, A. and Corbin, J. 1990 Basics of Qualitative Research, New York: Sage.
Streeck, J. 1994Gestures As Communication. II: The Audience As Co-Author,” Research in Language and Social Interaction 27: 239–67.
Suchman, L. 1987 Plans and Situated Actions: The Problem of Human Machine Communication, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Suchman, L. 1990 “A Representing Practice in Cognitive Science” in M. Lynch and S. Woolgar (eds) Representation in Scientific Practice, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Suzuki, H., Yoshiaki, H. and Ishii, K. 1997Measuring Information Behavior: A Time Budget Survey of Japan,” Social Indicators Research 42: 151–69.
Szabo, A. and Hastings, N. 2000Using IT in the Undergraduate Classroom: Should We Replace the Blackboard with Powerpoint?Computers & Education 35: 175–87.
Tannen, D., Wallat, C., Jaworski, A. and Coupland, N. 1987 “Interactive Frames and Knowledge Schemas in Interaction: Examples from a Medical Examination/Interview” in The Discourse Reader, London, New York: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Techmeier, B. 1998 “Der Kongressvortrag” in L. Hoffmann, H. Kalverkämüer, and H. E. Wiegand (eds) Fachsprachen/Languages for Special Purposes, Fachtextsorten der Wissenschaftssprachen, Berlin, New York: De Gruyter.
Ten Have, P. 1989 “The Consultation as a Genre” in B. Torode (ed.) Text and Talk as Social Practice: Discourse Difference and Division in Speech and Writing, Dordrecht: Foris.
Tomasello, M. 2008 The Origins of Human Communication, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Traue, B. 2010 Das Subjekt der Beratung, Bielefeld: transcript.
Tufte, E. R. 2006 Beautiful Evidence, Cheshire: Graphics Press.
Tufte, E. R. 2003 The Cognitive Style of PowerPoint, Cheshire: Graphics Press.
Twyman, M. 1979 “A Schema for the Study of Graphic Language” in P. A. Kolers, M. E. Wrolstad, and H. Bouma (eds) Processing of Visible Language, New York, London: L Plenum.
Ulmer, B. 1988Konversionserzählungen als rekonstruktive Gattung: Erzählerische Mittel und Strategien bei der Rekonstruktion eines Bekehrungserlebnisses,” Zeitschrift für Soziologie 17: 19–33.
UNESCO (ed.) 2005 Towards Knowledge Societies, Paris: United Nations Educational.
Van Dijk, T. 1980 Macrostructures: An Interdisciplinary Study of Global Structures in Discourse, Interaction, and Cognition, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Walker, J. A. and Chaplin, S. 1997 Visual Culture, Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Weber, K. and Ladkin, A. 2004Trends Affecting the Convention Industry in the 21st Century,” Journal of Convention & Event Industry 6(4): 47–63.
Weber, M. 1980 Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft, Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Webster, F. 1995 Theories of the Information Society, London: Blackwell.
Weiner, B. and Alkin, M. 1992 “Motivation,” in M. Alkin (ed.): Encyclopedia of Educational Research. New York: MacMillan (6th edition), 860–5.
Wilke, H. 2001 “Wissensgesellschaft” in G. Kneer, A. Nassehi, and M. Schroer (eds) Klassische Gesellschaftsbegriffe, München: Fink.
Wilson, E. L. 1870The Magic Lantern in Its Relation to Photography,” Photographic Mosaic, 118–19.
Winn, J. 2003Avoiding Death by PowerPoint,” Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering, Education and Practice 129(3): 11518.
World Tourism Organization 2006 Measuring the Economic Importance of the Meetings Industry – Developing a Future Satellite Account Extension, Madrid: WTO.
Yates, J. 1993 Control through Communication: The Rise of System in American Management, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Yates, J. 1989 The Rise of System in American Management, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Yates, J. and Orlikowski, W. J. 1992Genres of Organizational Communication: A Structurational Approach to Studying Communication and Media,” Academy of Management Review 17(2): 299–326.
Yates, J. and Orlikowski, W. J. 2008 “The PowerPoint Presentation and Its Corollaries: How Genres Shape Communicative Action in Organizations” in M. Zachary and C. Thralls (eds) The Cultural Turn: Communicative Practices in Workplaces and the Professions, Amityville, NY: Baywood.

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Book summary page views

Total views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between #date#. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.