Adam, B. (2002) ‘Perceptions of time’, in Companion encyclopedia of anthropology. [New ed.]. London: Routledge, pp. 503–526. Available at: https://ucl-new-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/f/1klfcc3/TN_cdi_proquest_ebookcentral_EBC169490.
Adam, Barbara (1995) Timewatch: the social analysis of time. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Alex Mesoudi, Andrew Whiten and Kevin N. Laland (2004) ‘Perspective: Is Human Cultural Evolution Darwinian? Evidence Reviewed from the Perspective of “The Origin of Species”’, Evolution, 58(1), pp. 1–11. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3449291.
Alison Wylie (2007) ‘Doing Archaeology as a Feminist: Introduction’, Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 14(3), pp. 209–216.
Andersson, C. (2011) ‘Paleolithic Punctuations and Equilibria: Did Retention Rather Than Invention Limit Technological Evolution?’, PaleoAnthropology, pp. 243–259. Available at: http://www.paleoanthro.org/journal/volumes/2011/.
Andrén, Anders and Crozier, Alan (1998) Between artifacts and texts: historical archaeology in global perspective. London: Plenum Press.
Andrews, G., Barrett, J.C. and Lewis, J.S.C. (2000) ‘Interpretation not record: The practice of archaeology’, Antiquity, 74(285), pp. 525–530.
Arnold, B. (1990) ‘The past as propaganda: Totalitarian archaeology in Nazi Germany’, Antiquity, 64(244), pp. 464–478.
Arnold, D.E. (1985) ‘Chapters 5, 8 and 9’, in Ceramic theory and cultural process. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Arnold III, P.J. and Wilkens, B.S. (2001) ‘On the VanPools’ “scientific” post-processualism’, American Antiquity, 66(2), pp. 361–366.
Arnold, P. (2003) ‘Back to basics: the middle-range program as pragmatic archaeology’, in Essential tensions in archaeological method and theory. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press, pp. 55–66.
Ashmore, W. and Knapp, A.B. (1999) ‘Archaeological landscapes: constructed, conceptualised, ideational’, in Archaeologies of landscape: contemporary perspectives. Malden, Mass: Blackwell Publishers, pp. 1–30.
Atkinson, R. J. C. (1960) Stonehenge. Harmondsworth: Penquin Books in association with Hamish Hamilton.
Aunger, Robert (2000) Darwinizing culture: the status of memetics as a science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bailey, G. (2007) ‘Time perspectives, palimpsests and the archaeology of time’, Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 26(2), pp. 198–223. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaa.2006.08.002.
Bamforth, D.B. (2002) ‘Evidence and metaphor in evolutionary archaeology’, American Antiquity, 67(3), pp. 435–452.
Bamforth, D.B. (2003) ‘What is archaeology? (Or confusion, sound and fury, signifying....)’, American Antiquity, 68(3), pp. 581–584.
Banks, Iain et al. (1996) Nationalism and archaeology: Scottish Archaeological Forum. Glasgow: Cruithne Press.
Barrett , J.C. (2012) ‘Agency, the duality of structure and the problem of the archaeological record’, in Archaeological theory today. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Polity, pp. 141–164.
Barrett, J. (1999) ‘The mythical landscapes of the British Iron Age’, in Archaeologies of landscape: contemporary perspectives. Malden, Mass: Blackwell Publishers, pp. 253–265.
Barrett, J.C. (2014) ‘The material constitution of humanness’, Archaeological Dialogues, 21(01), pp. 65–74. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1380203814000105.
Barrett, John C. (1993a) Fragments from antiquity: an archaeology of social life in Britain, 2900-1200 BC. Cambridge, Mass: Blackwell.
Barrett, John C. (1993b) Fragments from antiquity: an archaeology of social life in Britain, 2900-1200 BC. Oxford: Blackwell.
Bender, B. (1992a) ‘Theorising landscapes, and the prehistoric landscape of Stonehenge’, Man, 27(4), pp. 735–755.
Bender, B. (1992b) ‘Theorising landscapes, and the prehistoric landscape of Stonehenge’, Man, 27(4), pp. 735–755.
Bender, B. et al. (2007a) ‘Chapters 1 and 3’, in Stone worlds: narrative and reflexivity in landscape archaeology. Walnut Creek, Calif: Left Coast Press. Available at: https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=14615901840004761&institutionId=4761&customerId=4760&VE=true.
Bender, B. et al. (2007b) ‘Chapters 1 and 3’, in Stone worlds: narrative and reflexivity in landscape archaeology. Walnut Creek, Calif: Left Coast Press. Available at: https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=14615901840004761&institutionId=4761&customerId=4760&VE=true.
Bender, B., Hamilton, S. and Tilley, C. (1997) ‘Leskernick: Stone Worlds; Alternative Narratives; Nested Landscapes.’, Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society, 63, pp. 147–178. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0079497X00002413.
Bender, Barbara and Aitken, Paul (1998) Stonehenge: making space. Oxford: Berg.
Bentley , A. (2011) ‘“Style versus function” 30 years on’, in Evolutionary and interpretive archaeologies: a dialogue. Walnut Creek, Calif: Left Coast, pp. 83–104.
Bentley, A. and Maschner, H.D.G. (2008) ‘Complexity theory’, in Handbook of archaeological theories. Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press, pp. 245–270.
Bentley, R. and Alexander, M. (2008) ‘Introduction on archaeological theories’, in Handbook of archaeological theories. Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press.
Bentley, R. Alexander, Maschner, Herbert D. G., and Chippindale, Christopher (2008) Handbook of archaeological theories. Lanham, Md: AltaMira Press. Available at: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780759113602.
Bentley, R.A., Maschner, H.D.G. and Chippindale, C. (2008) ‘R. McGuire’, in Handbook of archaeological theories. Lanham, Md: AltaMira Press, pp. 73–93. Available at: https://www.vlebooks.com/Product/Index/156042?page=0&startBookmarkId=-1.
Berggren, A. and Hodder, I. (2003) ‘Social practice, method and some problems of field archaeology’, American Antiquity, 68(3), pp. 421–434.
Bernbeck, R. and Pollock, S. (2004) ‘The political economy of archaeological practice and the production of heritage in the Middle East’, in A companion to social archaeology. Malden, MA.: Blackwell Pub. Ltd, pp. 335–352. Available at: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/book/10.1002/9780470693605.
Bettinger, R.L. (1991) Hunter-gatherers: archaeological and evolutionary theory. New York: Plenum Press.
Binford, Lewis Roberts (2001) Constructing frames of reference: an analytical method for archaeological theory building using hunter-gatherer and environmental data sets. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Binford, L.R. (1962a) ‘Archaeology as anthropology’, American Antiquity, 28(2), pp. 217–225.
Binford, L.R. (1962b) ‘Archaeology as anthropology’, American Antiquity, 28(2), pp. 217–225.
Binford, L.R. (1964a) ‘A consideration of archaeological research design’, American Antiquity, 29(4), pp. 425–441.
Binford, L.R. (1964b) ‘A consideration of archaeological research design’, American Antiquity, 29(4), pp. 425–441.
Binford, L.R. (1968) ‘Archaeological perspectives’, in New perspectives in archeology. Chicago: Aldine, pp. 5–32.
Binford, L.R. (1977) ‘General introduction’, in For theory building in archaeology: essays on faunal remains, aquatic resources, spatial analysis and systemic modeling. London: Academic Press, pp. 1–10.
Binford, L.R. (1981a) ‘Behavioural archaeological and the “Pompeii Premise” ’, Journal of Anthropological Research, 37(3), pp. 195–208.
Binford, L.R. (1981b) ‘Relics to artifacts and monuments to assemblages: changing conceptual frameworks’, in Bones: ancient men and modern myths. London: Academic Press, pp. 3–20.
Binford, L.R. (1983) ‘Interassemblage variability: The Mousterian and the functional argument’, in Working at archaeology. New York: Academic Press, pp. 131–153. Available at: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=ffc747cb-4b36-e711-80c9-005056af4099.
Bintliff, J. L. (1991) The Annales school and archaeology. London: Leicester University Press.
Bintliff, J. L. and Pearce, Mark (2011) The death of archaeological theory? Oakville: Oxbow Books. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctvh1dk87.
Boone, J.L. and Smith, E.A. (1998) ‘Is It Evolution Yet? A Critique of Evolutionary Archaeology’, Current Anthropology, 39(S1), pp. S141–S174. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1086/204693.
Borić, Dušan (2010) Archaeology and memory. Oxford: Oxbow Books.
Boyd, Robert and Richerson, Peter J. (1985) Culture and the evolutionary process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Bradley, Richard (1998) The significance of monuments: on the shaping of human experience in Neolithic and Bronze Age Europe. London: Routledge.
Bradley, Richard (2002) The past in prehistoric societies. London: Routledge.
Bruce G. Trigger (1993) ‘Marxism in Contemporary Western Archaeology’, Archaeological Method and Theory, 5, pp. 159–200.
Bruce G. Trigger (1998) ‘Archaeology and Epistemology: Dialoguing across the Darwinian Chasm’, American Journal of Archaeology, 102(1), pp. 1–34.
Brück, J. (2001) ‘Monuments, power and personhood in the British Neolithic’, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 7(4), pp. 649–667. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9655.00082.
Brück, J. (2005a) ‘Experiencing the past? The development of a phenomenological archaeology in British prehistory’, Archaeological Dialogues, 12(01), pp. 45–72. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1380203805001583.
Brück, J. (2005b) ‘Experiencing the past? The development of a phenomenological archaeology in British prehistory’, Archaeological Dialogues, 12(1), pp. 45–72. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1380203805001583.
Brumfiel, E.M. (2000) ‘On the archaeology of choice: agency studies as a research strategem’, in Agency in archaeology. London: Routledge, pp. 249–255.
Buchli, Victor, Lucas, Gavin, and Cox, Margaret (2001) Archaeologies of the contemporary past. London: Routledge.
Butzer, Karl W. (1982) Archaeology as human ecology: method and theory for a contextual approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Carr, Lydia (2012) Tessa Verney Wheeler: women and archaeology before World War Two. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199640225.001.0001.
Carrithers, M., Collins, S. and Lukes, S. (eds) (1985) The category of the person: anthropology, philosophy, history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Casella, Eleanor Conlin and Fowler, Chris (2005) The archaeology of plural and changing identities: beyond identification. London: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
Chadwick, A. (2003) ‘Post-processualism, professionalization and archaeological methodologies. Towards reflexive and radical practice’, Archaeological Dialogues, 10(1), pp. 97–117. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1380203803001107.
Childe, V.G. (1929) ‘Preface and chapter 1’, in The Danube in prehistory. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. v-xii-1–7.
Childe, V.G. (1956) ‘What happens in prehistory?’, in Piecing together the past: the interpretation of archaeological data. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, pp. 135–158. Available at: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=c1eea4f3-9536-e711-80c9-005056af4099.
Chilton, Elizabeth S. (1999) Material meanings: critical approaches to the interpretation of material culture. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.
Chippindale, C. (1993) ‘Ambition, deference, discrepancy, comsumption: the intellectual background to a post-processual archaeology’, in Archaeological theory: who sets the agenda? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 27–36.
Chippindale, Christopher (1990) Who owns Stonehenge? London: Batsford.
Chippindale, Christopher (2004) Stonehenge complete. New and expanded [3rd] ed. [London]: Thames & Hudson.
Chris Gosden (2005) ‘What Do Objects Want?’, Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 12(3), pp. 193–211.
Clark, G. (1989) ‘Economic approach to prehistory’, in Economic prehistory: papers on archaeology. Cambridge [Cambridgeshire]: Cambridge University Press, pp. 149–168.
Clark, Grahame (1960) Archaeology and society. 3rd ed. London: Methuen.
Clarke, David L. and Chapman, Bob (1978) Analytical archaeology. 2nd ed. London: Methuen.
Clarke, D. L. (1973a) ‘Archaeology: The loss of innocence’, Antiquity, 47(185), pp. 6–18.
Clarke, David L. (1973) ‘Archaeology: The loss of innocence’, Antiquity, 47(185), pp. 6–18.
Clarke, D. L. (1973b) ‘Archaeology: the loss of innocence’, Antiquity, 47(185), pp. 6–18.
Cleal, Rosamund et al. (1995) Stonehenge in its landscape: twentieth-century excavations. London: English Heritage.
Cochrane, E.E. (2001) ‘Style, function and systematic empiricism: the conflation of process and pattern’, in Style and function: conceptual issues in evolutionary archaeology. London: Bergin & Garvey, pp. 183–202.
Cochrane, Ethan E. and Gardner, Andrew (2011a) Evolutionary and interpretive archaeologies: a dialogue. Walnut Creek, Calif: Left Coast.
Cochrane, Ethan E. and Gardner, Andrew (2011b) Evolutionary and interpretive archaeologies: a dialogue. Walnut Creek, Calif: Left Coast.
Collis, John (2001) Digging up the past: an introduction to archaeological excavation. Stroud: Sutton.
Colwell-Chanthaphonh, C. (2012) ‘Archaeology and indigenous collaboration’, in Archaeological theory today. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Polity, pp. 267–291.
Conkey, M.W. and Gero, J.M. (1997) ‘Programme to Practice: Gender and Feminism in Archaeology’, Annual Review of Anthropology, 26(1), pp. 411–437. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.26.1.411.
Conkey, M.W. and Spector, J.D. (1984) ‘Archaeology and the Study of Gender’, Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory, 7, pp. 1–38.
Conolly, J. (2000) ‘Catalhoyuk and the archaeological object’, in Towards reflexive method in archaeology: the example at Çatalhöyük : by members of the Çatalhöyük team. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, pp. 51–56. Available at: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=533279b1-a506-e811-80cd-005056af4099.
Cooper, Nicholas, Webster, Jane, and University of Leicester (1996) Roman imperialism: post-colonial perspectives. Leicester: School of Archaeological Studies, University of Leicester.
Cornell, P. and Fahlander, F. (2002) ‘Microarchaeology, materiality and social practice’, Current Swedish Archaeology, 10, pp. 21–38.
Courbin, Paul (1988) What is archaeology?: an essay on the nature of archaeological research. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Coward, F. et al. (2008) ‘The spread of Neolithic plant economies from the Near East to northwest Europe: a phylogenetic analysis’, Journal of Archaeological Science, 35(1), pp. 42–56. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2007.02.022.
Cowgill, G.L. (1993) ‘Distinguished lecture in archaeology: Beyond criticizing New Archaeology’, American Anthropologist, New Series, 95(3), pp. 551–573.
Currie, T.E. and Mace, R. (2011) ‘Mode and tempo in the evolution of socio-political organization: reconciling “Darwinian” and “Spencerian” evolutionary approaches in anthropology’, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 366(1567), pp. 1108–1117. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2010.0318.
David, B. and Thomas, J. (2008) ‘Landscape archaeology: Introduction’, in Handbook of landscape archaeology. Walnut Creek, Calif: Left Coast Press, pp. 27–43. Available at: https://www.routledgehandbooks.com/doi/10.4324/9781315427737.ch1.
David J. Meltzer (1979) ‘Paradigms and the Nature of Change in American Archaeology’, American Antiquity, 44(4), pp. 644–657.
Díaz-Andreu García, Margarita (2005) The archaeology of identity: approaches to gender, age, status, ethnicity and religion. London: Routledge.
Díaz-Andreu García, Margarita (2007) A world history of nineteenth-century archaeology: nationalism, colonialism, and the past. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Available at: https://academic-oup-com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/book/40265.
Diaz-Andreu, M. (2004) ‘Britain and the Other: the archaeology of imperialism’, in History, nationhood, and the question of Britain. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 227–241.
Dobres, M.-A. (2000) ‘Social agency and practice: the heart and soul of technology’, in Technology and social agency: outlining a practice framework for archaeology. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, pp. 127–163.
Dobres, M.-A. and Hoffman, C.R. (1994) ‘Social agency and the dynamics of prehistoric technology’, Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 1(3), pp. 211–258.
Dobres, M.-A. and Robb, J.E. (2000) ‘Agency in archaeology: Paradigm or platitude?’, in Agency in archaeology. London: Routledge, pp. 3–17.
Dobres, Marcia-Anne (2000a) Technology and social agency: outlining a practice framework for archaeology. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
Dobres, Marcia-Anne (2000b) Technology and social agency: outlining a practice framework for archaeology. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
Dornan, J.L. (2002) ‘Agency and archaeology: Past, present and future directions’, Journal of archaeological method and theory, 9(4), pp. 303–329. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021318432161.
Dowson, T.A. (2000) ‘Homosexuality, queer theory and archaeology’, in Interpretive archaeology: a reader. London: Leicester University Press, pp. 283–289.
Dowson, T.A. (2000) ‘Homosexuality, queer theory and archaeology’, in Interpretive archaeology: a reader. London: Leicester University Press, pp. 283–289.
Dunnell, R.C. (1978) ‘Style and function: A fundamental dichotomy’, American Antiquity, 43(2), pp. 192–202.
Dunnell, R.C. (1986) ‘Five decades of American archaeology’, in American archaeology, past and future: a celebration of the Society for American Archaeology, 1935-1985. London: Smithsonian Institution Press.
Dyson, Stephen L. (2006) In pursuit of ancient pasts: a history of classical archaeology in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. London: Yale University Press. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1npzcm.
Earle et. al., T.K. (1987) ‘Processual archaeology and the radical critique’, Current Anthropology, 28(4), pp. 501–538.
Edgeworth, Matt (2003) Acts of discovery: an ethnography of archaeological practice. Oxford: Archaeopress.
Edgeworth, Matt (2006) Ethnographies of archaeological practice: cultural encounters, material transformations. Lanham: Altamira Press.
Engelstad, E. (1991) ‘Images of power and contradiction: Feminist theory and post-processual archaeology’, Antiquity, 65(248), pp. 502–514.
Englehardt, J. (2013) Agency in ancient writing. Boulder: University Press of Colorado.
Fagan, Brian M. (2001) Grahame Clark: an intellectual biography of an archaeologist. Boulder, Colo: Westview.
Fagan, Garrett G. (2006) Archaeological fantasies: how pseudoarchaeology misrepresents the past and misleads the public. London: Routledge.
Ferguson, L. (1991) ‘Struggling with pots in colonial South Carolina’, in The archaeology of inequality. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 28–39.
Fewster, K.J. (2006) ‘The Role of Agency and Material Culture in Remembering and Forgetting: An Ethnoarchaeological Case Study from Central Spain’, Journal of Mediterranean Archaeology, 20(1). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1558//jmea.2007.v20i1.89.
Fisher, P. et al. (1997) ‘Spatial Analysis of Visible Areas from the Bronze Age Cairns of Mull’, Journal of Archaeological Science, 24(7), pp. 581–592. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1006/jasc.1996.0142.
Flannery, K.V. (1967) ‘Culture history vs. culture process: A Debate in American archaeology’, Scientific American, 2(2), pp. 119–122.
Flannery, K.V. (1968) ‘Archaeological systems theory and early Mesoamerica’, in Anthropological archeology in the Americas. Washington, DC: The Anthropological Society of Washington, pp. 67–87.
Flannery, K.V. (1982) ‘The Golden Marshalltown: A Parable for the Archeology of the 1980s’, American Anthropologist, 84(2), pp. 265–278. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1982.84.2.02a00010.
Flannery, K.V. (1999a) ‘Process and Agency in Early State Formation’, Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 9(1), pp. 3–21. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959774300015183.
Flannery, K.V. (1999b) ‘Process and Agency in Early State Formation’, Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 9(1), pp. 3–21. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959774300015183.
Fleming, A. (1999) ‘Phenomenology and the Megaliths of Wales: A Dreaming Too Far?’, Oxford Journal of Archaeology, 18(2), pp. 119–125. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0092.00074.
Fleming, A. (2006) ‘Post-processual landscape archaeology: A critique’, Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 16(3), pp. 267–280. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959774306000163.
Fowler, C. (2000) ‘The individual, the subject and archaeological interpretation: reading Luce Irigaray and Judith Butler’, in Philosophy and archaeological practice: perspectives for the 21st century. Göteborg: Bricoleur Press, pp. 107–122.
Fowler, C. (2001) ‘Personhood and Social Relations in the British Neolithic with a Study from the Isle of Man’, Journal of Material Culture, 6(2), pp. 137–163. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/135918350100600202.
Fowler, Chris (2004) The archaeology of personhood: an anthropological approach. London: Routledge.
Fowler, D. (2008) ‘Archaeological ethics in context and practice’, in Handbook of archaeological theories. Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press, pp. 409–422. Available at: https://www.vlebooks.com/Product/Index/156042?page=0&startBookmarkId=-1.
Frere, S.S. (1988) ‘Roman Britain since Haverfield and Richmond’, History and Archaeology Review, 3, pp. 31–36.
Funari, Pedro Paulo A., Zarankin, Andrés, and Stovel, Emily (2005) Global archaeological theory: contextual voices and contemporary thoughts. London: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
G. N. Bailey (1983) ‘Concepts of Time in Quaternary Prehistory’, Annual Review of Anthropology, 12, pp. 165–192. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2155645.
Gardner, A. (2003) ‘Seeking a material turn: the artefactuality of the Roman Empire’, in TRAC 2002: proceedings of the twelfth annual Theoretical Roman Archaeology Conference which took place at the University of Kent at Canterbury 5-6 April 2002. Oxford: Oxbow Books, pp. 1–13.
Gardner, A. (2008) ‘Agency’, in Handbook of archaeological theories. Lanham, Md: AltaMira Press, pp. 95–108. Available at: https://www.vlebooks.com/Product/Index/156042?page=0&startBookmarkId=-1.
Gardner, A. (2011) ‘Action and structure in interpretive archaeologies’, in Evolutionary and interpretive archaeologies: a dialogue. Walnut Creek, Calif: Left Coast, pp. 63–82.
Gardner, A. (2012) ‘Time and empire in the Roman world’, Journal of Social Archaeology, 12(2), pp. 145–166. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1469605312439971.
Gardner, Andrew (2007a) An archaeology of identity: soldiers and society in late Roman Britain. Walnut Creek, Calif: Left Coast Press. Available at: https://www-taylorfrancis-com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/books/mono/10.4324/9781315435091/archaeology-identity-andrew-gardner.
Gardner, Andrew (2007b) An archaeology of identity: soldiers and society in late Roman Britain. Walnut Creek, Calif: Left Coast Press. Available at: https://www-taylorfrancis-com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/books/mono/10.4324/9781315435091/archaeology-identity-andrew-gardner.
Gaydarska, B. (2009) ‘A brief history of TAG’, Antiquity, 83(322), pp. 1152–1162.
Gell, Alfred (1992) The anthropology of time: cultural constructions of temporal maps and images. Oxford: Berg.
Geller, P.L. (2009) ‘Identity and Difference: Complicating Gender in Archaeology’, Annual Review of Anthropology, 38(1), pp. 65–81. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-091908-164414.
Geoff Emberling (1997) ‘Ethnicity in Complex Societies: Archaeological Perspectives’, Journal of Archaeological Research, 5(4), pp. 295–344.
Gero, J.M. (1996) ‘Archaeological practice and gendered encounters with field data’, in Gender and archaeology. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, pp. 251–280.
Gero, J.M. and Wright, M. (1991) ‘Tensions, pluralities and engendering archaeology: An introduction to Women and Prehistory’, in Engendering archaeology: women and prehistory. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 3–30.
Gheorghiu, D. and Nash, G. (2013) Place as material culture: objects, geographies and the construction of time. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Pub.
Gilchrist, R. (1991) ‘Women’s archaeology? Political feminism, gender theory and historical revision’, Antiquity, 65(248), pp. 495–501.
Gilchrist, R. (2004) ‘Archaeology and the life course: a time and age for gender’, in A companion to social archaeology. Malden, MA.: Blackwell Pub. Ltd, pp. 142–160. Available at: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/book/10.1002/9780470693605.
Glenn R. Storey (1999) ‘Archaeology and Roman Society: Integrating Textual and Archaeological Data’, Journal of Archaeological Research, 7(3), pp. 203–248.
Gordon Childe, V. (1935) ‘Changing aims and methods in prehistory’, Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society, 1, pp. 1–15. Available at: http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL2028_47033.pdf.
Gosden, C. (2004) ‘The past and foreign countries: colonial and post-colonial archaeology and anthropology’, in A companion to social archaeology. Malden, MA.: Blackwell Pub. Ltd, pp. 161–178. Available at: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/book/10.1002/9780470693605.
Gosden, C. (2012) ‘Postcolonial archaeology. Issues of culture, identity and knowledge’, in Archaeological theory today. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Polity, pp. 241–261.
Gosden, C. and Marshall, Y. (1999) ‘The cultural biography of objects’, World Archaeology, 31(2), pp. 169–178.
Gosden, Chris (1994) Social being and time. Oxford: Blackwell.
Graves-Brown, P. (1996) ‘In search of the watchmaker: attribution of agency in natural and cultural selection’, in Darwinian archaeologies. London: Plenum Press, pp. 165–181.
Greene, K. (2010) ‘Chapter 6: making sense of the past’, in Archaeology: an introduction. 5th ed. London: Routledge, pp. 249–312. Available at: http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=UCL&isbn=9780203835975.
Greene, Kevin and Moore, Tom (2010) Archaeology: an introduction. 5th ed. London: Routledge.
Greg Woolf (2004) ‘The Present State and Future Scope of Roman Archaeology: A Comment’, American Journal of Archaeology, 108(3), pp. 417–428.
Hales, Shelley and Hodos, Tamar (2010) Material culture and social identities in the ancient world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hamilton et al., S. (2008) ‘Quarried away: thinking about landscapes of megalithic construction on Rapa Nui (Easter Island)’, in Handbook of landscape archaeology. Walnut Creek, Calif: Left Coast Press, pp. 176–186. Available at: https://www.routledgehandbooks.com/doi/10.4324/9781315427737.ch1.
Hamilton, S. (1999) ‘Lost in translation? A comment on the excavation report’, Papers from the Institute of Archaeology, 10, pp. 1–8. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5334/pia.140.
Hamilton, S. et al. (2006a) ‘Phenomenology in Practice: Towards a Methodology for a `Subjective’ Approach’, European Journal of Archaeology, 9(1), pp. 31–71. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461957107077704.
Hamilton, S. et al. (2006b) ‘Phenomenology in Practice: Towards a Methodology for a `Subjective’ Approach’, European Journal of Archaeology, 9(1), pp. 31–71. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461957107077704.
Hamilton, S. (2011) ‘The ambiguity of landscape: discussing points of relatedness in concepts and methods’, in Evolutionary and interpretive archaeologies: a dialogue. Walnut Creek, Calif: Left Coast, pp. 263–280.
Hamilton, S., Whitehouse, R. and Wright, K.I. (2007) ‘Introduction and section 1’, in Archaeology and women: ancient & modern issues. Walnut Creek, Calif: Left Coast Press, pp. 13–40.
Hannah, Robert (2009) Time in antiquity. Abingdon: Routledge.
Harding, J. (2005) ‘Rethinking the Great Divide: Long‐Term Structural History and the Temporality of Event’, Norwegian Archaeological Review, 38(2), pp. 88–101. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/00293650510032707.
Harris, David R. et al. (1994) The archaeology of V. Gordon Childe: contemporary perspectives : proceedings of the V. Gordon Childe Centennial Conference held at the Institute of Archaeology, University College London, 8-9 May 1992 under the auspices of the Institute of Archaeology and the Prehistoric Society. London: UCL Press.
Hassan, F. (1997) ‘Beyond the surface: Comments on Hodder’s reflexive excavation methodology’, Antiquity, 71(274), pp. 1020–1025.
Hassan, F.A. (1997) ‘Beyond the surface: Comments on Hodder’s “reflexive excavation methodology”’, Antiquity, 71(274), pp. 1020–1025.
Hastorf, C. (1991) ‘Gender, space and food in prehistory’, in Engendering archaeology: women and prehistory. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 132–159.
Hastorf, Christine Ann and Conkey, Margaret Wright (1989) The uses of style in archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hawkes, C. (1954) ‘Wenner-Gren Foundation Supper Conference - Archaeological theory and method: Some suggestiongs from the Old World’, American Anthropologist, 56(2), pp. 155–168. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/664357.
Hayden, B. and Cannon, A. (1983) ‘Where the garbage goes: Refuse disposal in the Maya Highlands’, Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 2(2), pp. 117–163. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-4165(83)90010-7.
Hays-Gilpin, K. (2008) ‘Gender’, in Handbook of archaeological theories. Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press, pp. 335–349. Available at: https://www.vlebooks.com/Product/Index/156042?page=0&startBookmarkId=-1.
Hegmon, M. (1992) ‘Archaeological research on style’, Annual Review of Anthropology, 21, pp. 517–536. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.21.100192.002505.
Hegmon, M. (2003) ‘Setting theoretical egos aside: Issues and theory in North American archaeology’, American Antiquity, 68(2), pp. 213–243.
Henson, D. (2012) Doing archaeology: a subject guide for students. London: Routledge. Available at: https://www-taylorfrancis-com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/books/mono/10.4324/9780203109878/archaeology-donald-henson.
Higgs, E.S. and Vita-Finzi, C. (1972) ‘Prehistoric economies: A territorial approach’, in Papers in economic prehistory: studies by members and associates of the British Academy Major Research Project in the Early History of Agriculture. London: Cambridge University Press, pp. 27–36.
Hill, E. (1998) ‘Gender-informed archaeology: The priority of definition, the use of analogy, and the multivariate approach’, Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 5(1), pp. 99–128. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02428417.
Hill, J.N. and Evans, R.K. (1972) ‘A model for classification and typology’, in Models in archaeology. London: Methuen, pp. 231–273.
Hingley, R. (2000) ‘Chapters 9 and 10’, in Roman officers and English gentlemen: the imperial origins of Roman archaeology. New York: Routledge.
Hingley, R. (2008) ‘Hadrian’s Wall in theory: pursuing new agendas’, in Understanding Hadrian’s Wall: papers from a conference held at South Shields, 3rd-5th November 2006, to mark the publication of the 14th edition of the Handbook to the Roman Wall. South Shields: Arbeia Society, pp. 25–28.
Hingley, R. (2010) ‘“The most ancient Boundary between England and Scotland”: Genealogies of the Roman Walls’, Classical Receptions Journal, 2(1), pp. 25–43. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/crj/clq001.
Hingley, Richard (2000) Roman officers and English gentlemen: the imperial origins of Roman archaeology. New York: Routledge.
Hodder, I. (1982) ‘Theoretical archaeology: A reactionary view’, in Symbolic and structural archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 92–121.
Hodder, I. (1985) ‘Postprocessual archaeology’, Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory, 8, pp. 1–26.
Hodder, I. (1989) ‘Post-modernism, post-structuralism and post-processual archaeology’, in The meanings of things: material culture and symbolic expression. London: Unwin Hyman, HarperCollins Academic, pp. 64–78.
Hodder, I. (1991) ‘Interpretive archaeology and its role’, American Antiquity, 56(1), pp. 7–18.
Hodder, I. (1992a) ‘Material practice, symbolism and ideology’, in Theory and practice in archaeology. London: Routledge, pp. 201–212.
Hodder, I. (1992b) ‘Material practice, symbolism and ideology’, in Theory and practice in archaeology. London: Routledge, pp. 201–212. Available at: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=6f7f0b8f-5136-e711-80c9-005056af4099.
Hodder, Ian (1992) ‘Writing archaeology: site reports in context’, in Theory and practice in archaeology. London: Routledge, pp. 263–274.
Hodder, I. (1993) ‘Bridging the divide: a commentary on theoretical Roman archaeology’, in Theoretical Roman archaeology: first conference proceedings. Aldershot: Avebury, pp. xiii–xix.
Hodder, I. (1997a) ‘Always momentary, fluid and flexible: Towards a reflexive excavation methodology’, Antiquity, 71(273), pp. 691–700.
Hodder, I. (1997b) ‘“Always momentary, fluid and flexible”: Towards a reflexive excavation methodology’, Antiquity, 71(273), pp. 691–700.
Hodder, I. (1998) ‘Whose rationality? A response to Fekri Hassan’, Antiquity, 72(275), pp. 213–217.
Hodder, I. (1999a) ‘Towards a reflexive method’, in The archaeological process: an introduction. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 80–104.
Hodder, I. (1999b) ‘Towards a reflexive method’, in The archaeological process: an introduction. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 80–104.
Hodder, I. (2001) ‘Introduction: a review of contemporary theoretical debate in archaeology’, in Archaeological theory today. Cambridge: Polity, pp. 1–13. Available at: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=nlebk&AN=1101335&site=ehost-live&scope=site&custid=s8454451.
Hodder, I. (2003) ‘Chapter 1: The problem’, in Reading the past: current approaches to interpretation in archaeology. 3rd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–19.
Hodder, I. (2011) ‘Human-thing entanglement: towards an integrated archaeological perspective’, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 17(1), pp. 154–177. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9655.2010.01674.x.
Hodder, I. (2012a) Entangled: an archaeology of the relationships between humans and things. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
Hodder, I. (2012b) ‘Introduction: contemporary theoretical debate in archaeology’, in Archaeological theory today. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Polity, pp. 1–14.
Hodder, I. and Hutson, S. (2003) Reading the past: current approaches to interpretation in archaeology. Third edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511814211.
Hodder, I., Karlsson, H. and Olsen, B. (2008) ‘40 Years of Theoretical Engagement: A Conversation with Ian Hodder’, Norwegian Archaeological Review, 41(1), pp. 26–42. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/00293650802181154.
Hodder, Ian (1982) Symbols in action: ethnoarchaeological studies of material culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hodder, Ian (1994) Interpreting archaeology: finding meaning in the past. London: Routledge.
Hodder, Ian (1999) The archaeological process: an introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.
Hodder, Ian (2001) Archaeological theory today. Cambridge: Polity. Available at: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=nlebk&AN=1101335&site=ehost-live&scope=site&custid=s8454451.
Hoffman, Christopher R. and Dobres, Marcia-Anne (1999) The social dynamics of technology: practice, politics, and world views. London: Smithsonian Institution Press.
Holdaway, Simon and Wandsnider, LuAnn (2008) Time in archaeology: time perspectivism revisited. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press. Available at: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ucl/detail.action?docID=3443820.
Hutson, S.R. (2001) ‘Synergy through disunity, science as social practice: Comments on VanPool and VanPool’, American Antiquity, 66(2), pp. 349–360.
Ian Hodder (1985) ‘Postprocessual Archaeology’, Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory, 8, pp. 1–26.
Ian Hodder and Mark Hassall (1971) ‘The Non-Random Spacing of Romano-British Walled Towns’, Man, 6(3), pp. 391–407.
Ingold, T. (1993) ‘The temporality of the landscape’, World Archaeology, 25(2), pp. 152–174.
Ingold, T. (2007) ‘Materials against materiality’, Archaeological Dialogues, 14(1), pp. 1–16. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1380203807002127.
James R. Sackett (1977) ‘The Meaning of Style in Archaeology: A General Model’, American Antiquity, 42(3), pp. 369–380.
James, S. (1998) ‘Celts, politics and motivation in archaeology’, Antiquity, 72(275), pp. 200–209.
James, S. (2002) ‘Writing the Legions: The Development and Future of Roman Military Studies in Britain’, Archaeological Journal, 159(1), pp. 1–58. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/00665983.2002.11020514.
James, S. (2003) ‘Roman archaeology: Crisis and revolution’, Antiquity, 77(295), pp. 178–184. Available at: http://search.proquest.com/docview/217561304?accountid=14511.
James, Simon (1999) The Atlantic Celts: ancient people or modern invention? London: British Museum Press.
James, Simon et al. (2001) Britons and Romans: advancing an archaeological agenda. York: Council for British Archaeology.
Johnson, M. (2006) ‘On the nature of theoretical archaeology and archaeological theory’, Archaeological Dialogues, 13(2), pp. 117–132. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S138020380621208X.
Johnson, M. (2010a) ‘Chapters 6 and 7’, in Archaeological theory: an introduction. 2nd ed. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
Johnson, M. (2010b) ‘Common sense is not enough’, in Archaeological theory: an introduction. 2nd ed. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 1–11.
Johnson, Matthew (2010) Archaeological theory: an introduction. 2nd ed. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
Johnson, M.H. (1989) ‘Conceptions of agency in archaeological interpretation’, Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 8(2), pp. 189–211. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-4165(89)90024-X.
Johnson, M.H. (1999) ‘Rethinking historical archaeology’, in Historical archaeology: back from the edge. New York: Routledge, pp. 23–36.
Jones, Andrew (2001) Archaeological theory and scientific practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jones, S. (1997) ‘Chapter 2’, in The archaeology of ethnicity: constructing identities in the past and present. London: Routledge.
Jones, S. (1997) The archaeology of ethnicity: constructing identities in the past and present. London: Routledge.
Jones, S. (2000) ‘Discourses of identity in the interpretation of the past’, in Interpretive archaeology: a reader. London: Leicester University Press, pp. 445–457.
Jones, S. (2008) ‘Ethnicity: theoretical approaches, methodological implications’, in Handbook of archaeological theories. Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press, pp. 321–333.
Joyce, R. (2004) ‘Embodied subjectivity: gender, feminity, masculinity, sexuality’, in A companion to social archaeology. Malden, MA.: Blackwell Pub. Ltd, pp. 82–95. Available at: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/book/10.1002/9780470693605.
Joyce, R.A. (2004) ‘Unintended Consequences? Monumentality as a Novel Experience in Formative Mesoamerica’, Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 11(1), pp. 5–29.
Joyce, R.A. (2005) ‘Archaeology of the Body’, Annual Review of Anthropology, 34(1), pp. 139–158. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.33.070203.143729.
Karlin, C. and Julien, M. (1994) ‘Prehistoric technology: a cognitive science?’, in The ancient mind: elements of cognitive archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 152–163.
Karlsson, Håkan (2001) It’s about time: the concept of time in archaeology. Göteborg: Bricoleur.
Kent G. Lightfoot, Antoinette Martinez and Ann M. Schiff (1998) ‘Daily Practice and Material Culture in Pluralistic Social Settings: An Archaeological Study of Culture Change and Persistence from Fort Ross, California’, American Antiquity, 63(2), pp. 199–222.
Knapp, A.B. and van Dommelen, P. (2008) ‘Past Practices: Rethinking Individuals and Agents in Archaeology’, Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 18(01), pp. 15–34. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959774308000024.
Knapp, A.B. and Meskell, L. (1997) ‘Bodies of Evidence on Prehistoric Cyprus’, Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 7(02), pp. 183–204. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959774300001931.
Knappet, C. (2012) ‘Materiality’, in Archaeological theory today. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Polity, pp. 188–207.
Knappett, C. (2002) ‘Photographs, Skeuomorphs and Marionettes: Some Thoughts on Mind, Agency and Object’, Journal of Material Culture, 7(1), pp. 97–117. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1359183502007001307.
Knappett, Carl (2005) Thinking through material culture: an interdisciplinary perspective. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Knappett, Carl (2011) An archaeology of interaction: network perspectives on material culture and society. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Available at: https://academic.oup.com/book/1407.
Knappett, Carl and Malafouris, Lambros (2008) Material agency: towards a non-anthropocentric approach. New York: Springer.
Kohl, P.L. (1998a) ‘Nationalism and archaeology: On the Constructions of Nations and the Reconstructions of the Remote Past’, Annual Review of Anthropology, 27(1), pp. 223–246. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.27.1.223.
Kohl, P.L. (1998b) ‘Nationalism and Archaeology: On the Constructions of Nations and the Reconstructions of the Remote Past’, Annual Review of Anthropology, 27(1), pp. 223–246. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.27.1.223.
Kohl, P.L. and Fawcett, C. (1995) ‘Archaeology in the service of the state: theoretical considerations’, in Nationalism, politics, and the practice of archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3–18.
Kristiansen, K. (2004) ‘Genes versus agents: A discussion of the widening theoretical gap in archaeology’, Archaeological Dialogues, 11(2), pp. 77–99. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1380203805211509.
Kristiansen, Kristian (2004) ‘Genes versus agents. A discussion of the widening theoretical gap in archaeology’, Archaeological Dialogues, 11(2), pp. 77–99. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1380203805211509.
Lake, M. (2007) ‘Viewing space’, World Archaeology, 39(1), pp. 1–3.
LaMotta, V. and Schiffer, M. (2001) ‘Behavioral archaeology. Towards a new synthesis’, in Archaeological theory today. Cambridge: Polity. Available at: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=nlebk&AN=1101335&site=ehost-live&scope=site&custid=s8454451.
LaMotta, V. and Schiffer, M. (2012) ‘Behavioral archaeology. Towards a new synthesis’, in Archaeological theory today. Rev. and updated ed. Cambridge: Polity, pp. 14–64.
Layton, R. (2006) ‘Structuralism and semiotics’, in Handbook of material culture. London: SAGE, pp. 29–42. Available at: http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=UCL&isbn=9781446206430.
Layton, Robert (1994) Who needs the past?: indigenous values and archaeology. London: Routledge.
van der Leeuw, S. (1984) ‘Dust to dust: a transformational view of the ceramic cycle’, in The many dimensions of pottery: ceramics in archaeology and anthropology. Amsterdam: Universiteit van Amsterdam, pp. 709–733.
Lemonnier, P. (1986) ‘The study of material culture today: Toward an anthropology of technical systems’, Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 5(2), pp. 147–186. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-4165(86)90012-7.
Leone et al., M. (1994) ‘Can an African-American historical archaeology be an alternative voice?’, in Interpreting archaeology: finding meaning in the past. London: Routledge, pp. 110–124.
Leone, M. (1986) ‘Symbolic, structural and critical archaeology’, in American archaeology, past and future: a celebration of the Society for American Archaeology, 1935-1985. London: Smithsonian Institution Press, pp. 415–438.
Leone, M. (1987) ‘Towards a critical archaeology’, Current Anthropology, 28(3), pp. 283–302.
Leone, M. and Preucel, R. (1992) ‘Archaeology in a democratic society: a critical perspective’, in Quandaries and quests: visions of archaeology’s future. [Carbondale, Ill.]: Center for Archaeological Investigations, Southern Illinois University at Carbondale, pp. 115–135.
Leone, Mark P. (1972) Contemporary archaeology: a guide to theory and contributions. Carbondale, Ill: Feffer & Simons.
Leone, Mark P. (2005) The archaeology of liberty in an American capital: excavations in Annapolis. Berkeley: University of California Press. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1525/j.ctt1ppc5g.
Lipo, Carl P. and Society for American Archaeology (2006) Mapping our ancestors: phylogenetic approaches in anthropology and prehistory. New Brunswick, N.J.: Aldine Transaction.
Llobera, M. (1996) ‘Exploring the topography of mind: GIS, social space and archaeology’, Antiquity, 70(269), pp. 612–622.
Lucas, G. (2001) ‘Introduction: archaeology and the field’, in Critical approaches to fieldwork: contemporary and historical archaeological practice. London: Routledge, pp. 1–17.
Lucas, G. (2008) ‘Time and Archaeological Event’, Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 18(01), pp. 59–65. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S095977430800005X.
Lucas, G. (2012) Understanding the archaeological record. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Available at: https://doi-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/10.1017/CBO9780511845772.
Lucas, Gavin (2005) The archaeology of time. London: Routledge.
Lydon, Jane and Rizvi, Uzma Z. (2010) Handbook of postcolonial archaeology. Walnut Creek, Calif: Left Coast Press. Available at: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ucl/detail.action?docID=911816.
Lyman, R. Lee, O’Brien, Michael J., and Dunnell, Robert C. (1997) The rise and fall of culture history. London: Plenum Press.
Lyman, R.L. (2007) ‘What is the `process’ in cultural process and in processual archaeology?’, Anthropological Theory, 7(2), pp. 217–250. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1463499607077299.
Lyman, R.L. and O’Brien, M.J. (2000) ‘Measuring and Explaining Change in Artifact Variation with Clade-Diversity Diagrams’, Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 19(1), pp. 39–74. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1006/jaar.1999.0339.
Lyman, R.L. and O’Brien, M.J. (2004) ‘A history of normative theory in Americanist archaeology’, Journal of archaeological method and theory, 11(4), pp. 369–396.
Mace, Ruth, Holden, Clare Janaki, and Shennan, Stephen (2005) The evolution of cultural diversity: a phylogenetic approach. London: UCL Press.
MacGregor, G. (1994) ‘Post-processual archaeology: the hidden agenda of the secret agent’, in Archaeological theory: progress or posture? Aldershot: Avebury, pp. 79–91.
Mackenzie, Iain M. (1994a) Archaeological theory: progress or posture? Aldershot: Avebury.
Mackenzie, Iain M. (1994b) Archaeological theory: progress or posture? Aldershot: Avebury.
Madonna L. Moss (2005) ‘Rifts in the Theoretical Landscape of Archaeology in the United States: A Comment on Hegmon and Watkins’, American Antiquity, 70(3), pp. 581–587.
Margaret W. Conkey (2007a) ‘Questioning Theory: Is There a Gender of Theory in Archaeology?’, Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 14(3), pp. 285–310.
Margaret W. Conkey (2007b) ‘Questioning Theory: Is There a Gender of Theory in Archaeology?’, Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 14(3), pp. 285–310.
Martinón-Torres, M. (2002) ‘Chaîne Opératoire: The concept and its aplications within the study of technology’, Gallaecia, 21, pp. 29–43. Available at: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=fb4bab91-db3d-ee11-8457-0050f2f06092.
Maschner, Herbert D. G., Chippindale, Christopher, and Bentley, R. Alexander (2008) Handbook of archaeological theories. Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press.
Mason, David J. P. and Symonds, Matthew F. A. (2009) Frontiers of knowledge: a research framework for Hadrian’s Wall, part of the Frontiers of the Roman Empire World Heritage site. Durham: Durham County Council and Durham University.
McGlade, J. (1999) ‘Archaeology and the evolution of cultural landscapes: towards an interdisciplinary agenda’, in The archaeology and anthropology of landscape: shaping your landscape. London: Routledge, pp. 458–482.
McGuire, R. (2004) ‘Contested pasts: archaeology and Native Americans’, in A companion to social archaeology. Malden, MA.: Blackwell Pub. Ltd, pp. 374–395.
McGuire, Randall H. (2008) Archaeology as political action. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Megaw, J.V.S. and Megaw, M.R. (1996) ‘Ancient Celts and Modern Ethnicity’, Antiquity, 70(267), pp. 175–181.
Meskell, L. (2002) ‘The Intersections of Identity and Politics in Archaeology’, Annual Review of Anthropology, 31(1), pp. 279–301. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.31.040402.085457.
Meskell, L. (2012) ‘Archaeologies of identity’, in Archaeological theory today. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Polity, pp. 187–213.
Meskell, Lynn (1998) Archaeology under fire: nationalism, politics and heritage in the Eastern Mediterranean and Middle East. London: Routledge.
Meskell, Lynn (1999a) Archaeologies of social life: age, sex, class et cetera in ancient Egypt. Oxford: Blackwell.
Meskell, Lynn (1999b) Archaeologies of social life: age, sex, class et cetera in ancient Egypt. Oxford: Blackwell.
Meskell, Lynn (1999c) Archaeologies of social life: age, sex, class et cetera in ancient Egypt. Oxford: Blackwell.
Meskell, Lynn (2004) Object worlds in ancient Egypt: material biographies past and present. Oxford: Berg.
Meskell, Lynn (2006) Archaeologies of materiality. Malden, Mass: Blackwell.
Meskell, Lynn and Joyce, Rosemary A. (2003a) Embodied lives: figuring ancient Maya and Egyptian experience. London: Routledge.
Meskell, Lynn and Joyce, Rosemary A. (2003b) Embodied lives: figuring ancient Maya and Egyptian experience. London: Routledge.
Meskell, Lynn and Preucel, Robert W. (2004) A companion to social archaeology. Malden, MA.: Blackwell Pub. Ltd. Available at: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/book/10.1002/9780470693605.
Michael Shanks (2007) ‘Symmetrical Archaeology’, World Archaeology, 39(4), pp. 589–596.
Michelle Hegmon (2003) ‘Setting Theoretical Egos Aside: Issues and Theory in North American Archaeology’, American Antiquity, 68(2), pp. 213–243.
Michelle Hegmon (2005) ‘No More Theory Wars: A Response to Moss’, American Antiquity, 70(3), pp. 588–590.
Miller, D. (2002) ‘Artefacts and the meaning of things’, in Companion encyclopedia of anthropology. [New ed.]. London: Routledge, pp. 396–419. Available at: https://ucl-new-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/f/1klfcc3/TN_cdi_proquest_ebookcentral_EBC169490.
Miller, D. and Tilley, C.Y. (1984) ‘Ideology, power and prehistory: An introduction’, in Ideology, power and prehistory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–15.
Miller, Daniel (2005) Materiality. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.
Mithen, S.J. (1990) Thoughtful foragers: a study of prehistoric decision making. Cambridge [England]: Cambridge University Press.
Mithen, S.J. (1996) The prehistory of the mind: a search for the origins of art, religion and science. London: Thames & Hudson.
Mizoguchi, Kōji (2006) Archaeology, society and identity in modern Japan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Moore, H.L. (1994) ‘Bodies on the move: gender, power and material culture’, in A passion for difference: essays in anthropology and gender. Cambridge: Polity, pp. 71–85.
Moore, T. (2011) ‘Detribalizing the later prehistoric past: Concepts of tribes in Iron Age and Roman studies’, Journal of Social Archaeology, 11(3), pp. 334–360. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1469605311403861.
Moshenska, Gabriel and Dhanjal, Sarah (2012) Community archaeology: themes, methods and practices. Oxford: Oxbow. Available at: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ucl/detail.action?docID=1154191.
Murray, T. (1993) ‘Communication and the importance of disciplinary communities: who owns the past?’, in Archaeological theory: who sets the agenda? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 105–116.
Murray, Tim and World Archaeological Congress (1999) Time and archaeology. London: Routledge.
Mytum, H. (2007) ‘Materiality and memory: an archaeological perspective on the popular adoption of linear time in Britain’, Antiquity, 81(312), pp. 381–396. Available at: http://search.proquest.com/docview/217581355?accountid=14511.
Nancy D. Munn (1992) ‘The Cultural Anthropology of Time: A Critical Essay’, Annual Review of Anthropology, 21, pp. 93–123. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2155982.
Nanni, G. (2011) ‘Time, empire and resistance in settler-colonial Victoria’, Time & Society, 20(1), pp. 5–33. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0961463X10369765.
Nelson, M.C. (1991) ‘The study of technological organization’, Archaeological Method and Theory, 3, pp. 57–100.
Nelson, Sarah M. (2006) Handbook of gender in archaeology. Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press.
Nesbitt, C. and Tolia-Kelly, D. (2009) ‘Hadrian’s Wall: Embodied archaeologies of the linear monument’, Journal of Social Archaeology, 9(3), pp. 368–390. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1469605309338428.
O’Brien, Michael J., Lyman, R. Lee, and Schiffer, Michael B. (2005a) Archaeology as a process: processualism and its progeny. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.
O’Brien, Michael J., Lyman, R. Lee, and Schiffer, Michael B. (2005b) Archaeology as a process: processualism and its progeny. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.
O’Brien, M.J. (2003) ‘Style, function, transmission: an introduction’, in Style, function, transmission: evolutionary archaeological perspectives. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press, pp. 1–32.
O’Brien, M.J., Lyman, R.L. and Leonard, R.D. (2003) ‘What is evolution? A response to Bamforth’, American Antiquity, 68(3), pp. 573–580.
Olsen, B. (2003) ‘Material culture after text: re‐membering things’, Norwegian Archaeological Review, 36(2), pp. 87–104. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/00293650310000650.
Olsen, Bjørnar (2012) Archaeology: the discipline of things. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Olsen, B. (2012) ‘Symmetical archaeology’, in Archaeological theory today. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Polity, pp. 208–228.
Papaconstantinou, Demetra (2006) Deconstructing context: a critical approach to archaeological practice. Oxford: Oxbow.
Parker Pearson et. al., M. (2006) ‘Stonehenge, its river and its landscape: Unravelling the mysteries of a prehistoric sacred place’, Archäologischer Anzeiger: Beiblatt zum Jahrbuch des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts, 1, pp. 237–258.
Parker Pearson et. al., M. (2007) ‘The age of Stonehenge’, Antiquity, 81(313), pp. 617–639.
Parker Pearson et. al., M. (2009) ‘Who was buried at Stonehenge?’, Antiquity, 83(319), pp. 23–39.
Parker Pearson, M. and Ramilisonina (1998a) ‘Stonehenge for the ancestors: The stones pass on the message’, Antiquity, 72(276), pp. 308–326.
Parker Pearson, M. and Ramilisonina (1998b) ‘Stonehenge for the ancestors: The stones pass on the message’, Antiquity, 72(276), pp. 308–326.
Patrik, L.E. (1985) ‘Is there an archaeological record?’, Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory, 8, pp. 27–62.
Patterson, T. (2004) ‘Social archaeology and Marxist social thought’, in A companion to social archaeology. Malden, MA.: Blackwell Pub. Ltd, pp. 66–81. Available at: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/book/10.1002/9780470693605.
Patterson, Thomas Carl (2003) Marx’s ghost: conversations with archaeologists. Oxford: Berg.
Pauketat, T.R. (2001a) ‘Practice and history in archaeology: An emerging paradigm’, Anthropological Theory, 1(1), pp. 73–98. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/146349960100100105.
Pauketat, T.R. (2001b) ‘Practice and history in archaeology: An emerging paradigm’, Anthropological Theory, 1(1), pp. 73–98. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/146349960100100105.
Pearson, M.P. (2006) ‘Materializing Stonehenge: The Stonehenge Riverside Project and New Discoveries’, Journal of Material Culture, 11(1–2), pp. 227–261. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1359183506063024.
Pearson, M.P., Schadla-Hall, T. and Moshenska, G. (2011) ‘Resolving the Human Remains Crisis in British Archaeology’, Papers from the Institute of Archaeology, 21, pp. 5–9. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5334/pia.369.
Pfaffenberger, B. (1992) ‘Social Anthropology of Technology’, Annual Review of Anthropology, 21(1), pp. 491–516. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.21.100192.002423.
Plog, F. (1973) ‘Laws, systems of laws and the explanation of observed variation’, in The explanation of culture change: models in prehistory. London: Duckworth, pp. 649–661.
Pluciennik, Mark, Tarlow, Sarah, and Hamilakis, Yannis (2002) Thinking through the body: archaeologies of corporeality. London: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
Pope, R. (2011a) ‘Processual archaeology and gender politics. The loss of innocence’, Archaeological Dialogues, 18(1), pp. 59–86. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1380203811000134.
Pope, R. (2011b) ‘Processual archaeology and gender politics. The loss of innocence’, Archaeological Dialogues, 18(01), pp. 59–86. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1380203811000134.
Powell, A., Shennan, S. and Thomas, M.G. (2009) ‘Late Pleistocene Demography and the Appearance of Modern Human Behavior’, Science, 324(5932), pp. 1298–1301. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1170165.
Praetzellis, Adrian (2000) Death by theory: a tale of mystery and archaeological theory. Oxford: AltaMira Press.
Preucel, R. and Bauer, A. (2001) ‘Archaeological Pragmatics’, Norwegian Archaeological Review, 34(2), pp. 85–96. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/00293650127469.
Preucel, Robert W. (2006) Archaeological semiotics. Oxford: Blackwell.
Preucel, R.W. (1995) ‘The postprocessual condition’, Journal of Archaeological Research, 3(2), pp. 147–175.
Preucel, R.W. and Mrozowski, S.A. (2010) ‘The new pragmatism’, in Contemporary archaeology in theory: the new pragmatism. 2nd ed. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 3–49.
Price, B.J. (1982) ‘Cultural Materialism: A Theoretical Review’, American Antiquity, 47(4), pp. 709–741.
Quirke, Stephen (2010) Hidden hands: Egyptian workforces in Petrie excavation archives, 1880-1924. London: Gerald Duckworth.
R. Alexander Bentley, Matthew W. Hahn and Stephen J. Shennan (2004) ‘Random Drift and Culture Change’, Proceedings: Biological Sciences, 271(1547), pp. 1443–1450. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4142981.
Ratnagar, S. (2004) ‘Archaeology at the Heart of a Political Confrontation: The Case of Ayodhya’, Current Anthropology, 45(2), pp. 239–259. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1086/381044.
Rautman, Alison E. and Gender and Archaeology Conference (2000) Reading the body: representations and remains in the archaeological record. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Redman, C. (1999) ‘The development of archaeological theory’, in Companion encyclopedia of archaeology. London: Routledge, pp. 48–80.
Redman, Charles L. (1978) Social archeology: beyond subsistence and dating. New York: Academic Press.
Redman, C.L. (1991) ‘Distinguished lecture in archaeology: In defence of the seventies - The adolescence of New Archaeology’, American Anthropologist, 93(2), pp. 295–307.
Rega, E. (1996) ‘Age, gender and biological reality in the Early Bronze Age cemetery at Mokrin’, in Invisible people and processes: writing gender and childhood into European archaeology. London: Leicester University Press, pp. 229–247.
Reid, Donald M. (2002) Whose pharaohs?: archaeology, museums, and Egyptian national identity from Napoleon to World War I. Berkeley, Calif: University of California Press.
Reinhard Bernbeck and Susan Pollock (1996) ‘Ayodhya, Archaeology, and Identity’, Current Anthropology, 37(1), pp. S138–S142.
Renfrew, C. (1972) ‘Culture systems and the multiplier effect’, in The emergence of civilisation: the Cyclades and the Aegean in the Third Millennium B.C. London: Methuen, pp. 19–44.
Renfrew, C. (1973a) ‘Monuments, mobilization and social organisation in Neolithic Wessex’, in The explanation of culture change: models in prehistory. London: Duckworth, pp. 539–558.
Renfrew, C. (1973b) ‘Monuments, mobilization and social organization in Neolithic Wessex’, in The explanation of culture change: models in prehistory. London: Duckworth, pp. 539–558.
Renfrew, C. (1994) ‘Towards a cognitive archaeology’, in The ancient mind: elements of cognitive archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3–12.
Renfrew, C. (1999) ‘Beyond diffusion’, in Before civilization: the radiocarbon revolution and prehistoric Europe. London: Pimlico, pp. 109–119.
Renfrew, Colin, Cunliffe, Barry W., and British Academy (1997) Science and Stonehenge. Oxford: Oxford University Press for the British Academy.
Renfrew, Colin, DeMarrais, Elizabeth, and Gosden, Chris (2004) Rethinking materiality: the engagement of mind with the material world. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.
Renfrew, Colin and Research Seminar in Archaeology and Related Subjects (1973) The explanation of culture change: models in prehistory. London: Duckworth.
Review by: Lewis R. Binford (no date) ‘American Antiquity’, Vol. 53(No. 4), pp. 875–876.
Richards, Julian C., Allen, Mike, and English Heritage (1990) The Stonehenge environs project. London: Historical Buildings & Monuments Commission for England.
Richards, Julian C. and English Heritage (1991) English Heritage book of Stonehenge. London: B. T. Batsford Ltd./ English Heritage.
Richerson, Peter J. and Boyd, Robert (2005) Not by genes alone: how culture transformed human evolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Richerson, P.J. and Boyd, R. (2005) Not by genes alone: how culture transformed human evolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Robb, J. and Pauketat, T.R. (2013) Big histories, human lives: tackling problems of scale in archaeology. Santa Fe, N.M.: School for Advanced Research Press.
Robb, J.E. (1998) ‘The archaeology of symbols’, Annual Review of Anthropology, 27, pp. 329–346. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.27.1.329.
Robb, J.E. and Dobres, M.-A. (2000) ‘Agency in archaeology: Paradigm or Platitude?’, in Agency in archaeology. London: Routledge, pp. 3–17.
Robert C. Dunnell (1982) ‘The Harvey Lecture Series. Science, Social Science, and Common Sense: The Agonizing Dilemma of Modern Archaeology’, Journal of Anthropological Research, 38(1), pp. 1–25.
Rosen, Ralph Mark and University of Pennsylvania (2004) Time and temporality in the ancient world. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology.
Roskams, S. (2001) ‘Future prospects’, in Excavation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 267–290.
Ross, Jennifer C. and Steadman, Sharon R. (2010) Agency and identity in the ancient Near East: new paths forward. London: Equinox.
Rowley-Conwy, P., Layton, R. and Panter-Brick, C. (2001) Hunter-gatherers: an interdisciplinary perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Saitta, Dean J. (2007) The archaeology of collective action. Gainesville: University Press of Florida.
Scarre, G. and Coningham, R. (2013) Appropriating the past: philosophical perspectives on the practice of archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Available at: https://doi-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/10.1017/CBO9781139026932.
Schiffer, M.B. (1972) ‘Archaeological context and systemic context’, American Antiquity, 37(2), pp. 156–165.
Schiffer, M.B. (1985) ‘Is there a “Pompeii Premise” in archaeology?’, Journal of Anthropological Research, 41(1), pp. 18–41.
Schiffer, M.B. and Skibo, J.M. (1997) ‘The explanation of artifact variability’, American Antiquity, 62(1), pp. 27–50.
Schiffer, Michael B. (1976) Behavioral archaeology. London: Academic Press.
Schiffer, Michael B. (1987) Formation processes of the archaeological record. Albuquerque, N.M.: University of New Mexico Press.
Schiffer, Michael B. (1995) Behavioral archaeology: first principles. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.
Schlanger , N. (1994) ‘Mindful technology: unleashing the Chaine operatoire for an archaeology of mind’, in The ancient mind: elements of cognitive archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 143–151.
Schnapp, A. (2002) ‘Between antiquarians and archaeologists - Continuities and ruptures’, Antiquity, 76(291), pp. 134–140.
Shanks, M. (2008a) ‘Post-processual archaeology and after’, in Handbook of archaeological theories. Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press, pp. 133–144.
Shanks, M. (2008b) ‘Post-processual archaeology and after’, in Handbook of archaeological theories. Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press, pp. 133–144. Available at: http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=UCL&isbn=9780759113602.
Shanks, M. and Hodder, I. (1994) ‘Processual, postprocessual and interpretive archaeologies’, in Interpreting archaeology: finding meaning in the past. London: Routledge, pp. 3–29.
Shanks, M. and McGuire, R.H. (1996) ‘The craft of archaeology’, American Antiquity, 61(1), pp. 75–88.
Shanks, M. and Tilley, C. (1987) ‘Abstract and Substantial Time’, Archaeological Review From Cambridge, 6(1), pp. 32–41.
Shanks, M. and Tilley, C. (1989) ‘Comments on Archaeology into the 1990s’, Norwegian Archaeological Review, 22(1), pp. 12–54. Available at: https://www-tandfonline-com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/toc/sarc20/22/1?nav=tocList.
Shanks, M. and Tilley, Christopher Y (1987) ‘Archaeology and the politics of theory’, in Social theory and archaeology. Cambridge: Polity in association with Blackwell, pp. 186–208.
Shanks, M. and Tilley, Christopher Y. (1987) ‘The individual and the social’, in Social theory and archaeology. Cambridge: Polity in association with Blackwell, pp. 61–78.
Shanks, M. and Tilley, C.Y. (1992) ‘Chapter 3: facts and values in archaeology’, in Re-constructing archaeology: theory and practice. 2nd ed. London: Routledge, pp. 46–67.
Shanks, Michael and Tilley, Christopher Y. (1992) Re-constructing archaeology: theory and practice. 2nd ed. London: Routledge.
Shennan, S. (2008) ‘Evolution in Archaeology’, Annual Review of Anthropology, 37(1), pp. 75–91. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.37.081407.085153.
Shennan, S. (2011) ‘Descent with modification and the archaeological record’, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 366(1567), pp. 1070–1079. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2010.0380.
Shennan, S.J. (1994) ‘Introduction: archaeological approaches to cultural identity’, in Archaeological approaches to cultural identity. London: Routledge, pp. 1–32.
Shennan, S.J. (2011) ‘An evolutionary perspective on the goals of archaeology’, in Evolutionary and interpretive archaeologies: a dialogue. Walnut Creek, Calif: Left Coast, pp. 325–344.
Shennan, Stephen (2002a) Genes, memes and human history: Darwinian archaeology and cultural evolution. London: Thames & Hudson.
Shennan, Stephen (2002b) Genes, memes and human history: Darwinian archaeology and cultural evolution. London: Thames & Hudson.
Shennan, Stephen (2009) Pattern and process in cultural evolution. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Shott, M.J. (1998) ‘Status and role of formation theory in contemporary archaeological practice’, Journal of archaeological research, 6(4), pp. 299–329.
Sigault, F. (2002) ‘Technology’, in Companion encyclopedia of anthropology. [New ed.]. London: Routledge, pp. 420–459. Available at: https://ucl-new-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/f/1klfcc3/TN_cdi_proquest_ebookcentral_EBC169490.
Sillar, B. (2009) ‘The Social Agency of Things? Animism and Materiality in the Andes’, Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 19(03), pp. 367–377. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959774309000559.
SILLAR, B. and TITE, M.S. (2000) ‘THE CHALLENGE OF ‘TECHNOLOGICAL CHOICES’FOR MATERIALS SCIENCE APPROACHES IN ARCHAEOLOGY’, Archaeometry, 42(1), pp. 2–20. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4754.2000.tb00863.x.
Sinclair, A. (2000) ‘Constellations of knowledge: human agency and material affordance in lithic technology’, in Agency in archaeology. London: Routledge, pp. 196–212.
Smith, Laurajane (2004a) Archaeological theory and the politics of cultural heritage. London: Routledge.
Smith, Laurajane (2004b) Archaeological theory and the politics of cultural heritage. London: Routledge.
Smith, Stuart Tyson (2003) Wretched Kush: ethnic identities and boudaries in Egypt’s Nubian empire. London: Routledge.
Sofaer, Joanna R. (2006) The body as material culture: a theoretical osteoarchaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816666.
Sørensen, Marie Louise Stig (2000) Gender archaeology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Sørensen, M.L.S. (1997) ‘Reading Dress: The Construction of Social Categories and Identities in Bronze Age Europe’, Journal of European Archaeology, 5(1), pp. 93–114. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1179/096576697800703656.
Spaulding, A.C. (1953) ‘Statistical techniques for the discovery of artifact types’, American Antiquity, 18(4), pp. 305–313.
Spector, J. (1991) ‘What this awl means: towards a feminist archaeology’, in Engendering archaeology: women and prehistory. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 388–406.
Spriggs, M. (2008) ‘Ethnographic parallels and the denial of history’, World Archaeology, 40(4), pp. 538–552. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/00438240802453161.
Stark, Miriam T. (1998) The archaeology of social boundaries. London: Smithsonian Institution Press.
Steven Mithen (1995) ‘Understanding Mind and Culture: Evolutionary Psychology or Social Anthropology?’, Anthropology Today, 11(6), pp. 3–7. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/2783517?origin=crossref.
Stottman, M. Jay (2010) Archaeologists as activists: can archaeologists change the world? Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
Strauss, C. (2007) ‘Blaming for Columbine’, Current Anthropology, 48(6), pp. 807–832. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1086/520975.
Tarlow, S. and Stutz, L.N. (2013) ‘Can an archaeologist be a public intellectual?’, Archaeological Dialogues, 20(01), pp. 1–5. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1380203813000032.
Tarlow, Sarah and West, Susie (1999) The familiar past?: archaeologies of later historical Britain. London: Routledge.
Taylor, T. (2008) ‘Materiality’, in Handbook of archaeological theories. Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press, pp. 297–320. Available at: https://www.vlebooks.com/Product/Index/156042?page=0&startBookmarkId=-1.
Taylor, W.W. (1948a) ‘Chapter 6’, in A study of archaeology. [S.l.]: American Anthropological Association.
Taylor, W.W. (1948b) ‘Chapter 6’, in A study of archaeology. [S.l.]: American Anthropological Association.
Taylor, W.W. (1972) ‘Old wine and new skins: A contemporary parable’, in Contemporary archaeology: a guide to theory and contributions. Carbondale, Ill: Feffer & Simons, pp. 28–33.
Thomas, David Hurst (2000) Skull wars: Kennewick man, archaeology, and the battle for Native American identity. New York, N.Y.: Basic Books.
Thomas, J. (1994a) ‘Where are we now? Archaeological theory in the 1990s’, in Theory in archaeology: a world perspective. London: Routledge, pp. 343–362.
Thomas, J. (1994b) ‘Where are we now? Archaeological theory in the 1990s’, in Theory in archaeology: a world perspective. London: Routledge, pp. 343–362.
Thomas, J. (1999a) ‘Culture and identity’, in Companion encyclopedia of archaeology. London: Routledge, pp. 431–469.
Thomas, J. (1999b) ‘Culture and identity’, in Companion encyclopedia of archaeology. London: Routledge, pp. 431–469.
Thomas, J. (2004a) ‘Chapter 6’, in Archaeology and modernity. London: Routledge.
Thomas, J. (2004b) ‘Humanism and the individual: chapter 6’, in Archaeology and modernity. London: Routledge, pp. 119–148.
Thomas, J. (2012) ‘Archaeologies of place and landscape’, in Archaeological theory today. Rev. and updated ed. Cambridge: Polity, pp. 165–186.
Thomas, J.S. (1993) ‘The politics of vision and the archaeologies of landscape’, in Landscape: politics and perspectives. New York: Berg, pp. 19–48.
Thomas, Julian (1996a) Time, culture and identity: an interpretative archaeology. London: Routledge.
Thomas, Julian (1996b) Time, culture and identity: an interpretative archaeology. New York: Routledge.
Thomas, Julian (2004) Archaeology and modernity. London: Routledge.
Thomas, Julian and David, Bruno (2008) Handbook of landscape archaeology. Walnut Creek, Calif: Left Coast Press. Available at: https://www.routledgehandbooks.com/doi/10.4324/9781315427737.ch1.
Thomas, Julian, Jorge, Vítor Oliveira, and Theoretical Archaeology Group (England) (2007) Overcoming the modern invention of material culture: proceedings of the TAG session, Exeter 2006. Porto: ADECAP.
Tilley, Christopher (1989) ‘Excavation as Theatre’, Antiquity, 63(239), pp. 275–280.
Tilley, C. (1989) ‘Interpreting material culture’, in The meanings of things: material culture and symbolic expression. London: Routledge, pp. 185–194.
Tilley, C. (2004a) ‘Round Barrows and Dykes as Landscape Metaphors’, Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 14(2), pp. 185–203. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959774304000125.
Tilley, C. (2004b) ‘Round Barrows and Dykes as Landscape Metaphors’, Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 14(2), pp. 185–203. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959774304000125.
Tilley, C. and Bennett, W. (2001) ‘An archaeology of super-natural places: the case of West Penwith’, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 7(2), pp. 335–362.
Tilley, Christopher Y. (1992) Interpretative archaeology. New York: Berg.
Tilley, Christopher Y. (1999) Metaphor and material culture. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
Tilley, C.Y. (1984) ‘Ideology and the legitimation of power in the middle Neolithic of southern Sweden’, in Ideology, power and prehistory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 111–145. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511897443.
Tilley, C.Y. (1989) ‘Archaeology as socio-political action in the present’, in Critical traditions in contemporary archaeology: essays in the philosophy, history and socio-politics of archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 104–116.
Tilley, C.Y. (1994) ‘Space, place, landscape and perception: phenomenological perspectives’, in A phenomenology of landscape: places, paths, and monuments. Oxford: Berg, pp. 7–34.
Tilley, C.Y. (1996) ‘The powers of rocks: Topography and monument construction on Bodmin Moor’, World Archaeology, 28(2), pp. 161–176.
Tilley, C.Y. (2008) ‘Phenomenological approaches to landscape archaeology’, in Handbook of landscape archaeology. Walnut Creek, Calif: Left Coast Press, pp. 271–276. Available at: https://www.routledgehandbooks.com/doi/10.4324/9781315427737.ch1.
Tim Ingold (1993) ‘The Temporality of the Landscape’, World Archaeology, 25(2), pp. 152–174. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/124811.
Treherne, P. (1995) ‘The warrior’s beauty: the masculine body and self-identity in Bronze Age Europe’, Journal of European archaeology: journal of the European Association of Archaeologists, 3(1), pp. 105–144.
Trigger, B.G. (1970) ‘Aims in prehistoric archaeology’, Antiquity, 44(173), pp. 26–37.
Trigger, B.G. (1978) ‘Current trends in American archaeology’, in Time and traditions: essays in archaeological interpretation. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, pp. 2–18.
Trigger, B.G. (1980) ‘Archaeology and the image of the American Indian’, American Antiquity, 45(4), pp. 662–676.
Trigger, Bruce G. (1984) ‘Alternative archaeologies: Nationalist, colonialist, imperialist’, Man, 19(3), pp. 355–370.
Trigger, B G (1984) ‘Archaeology at the Crossroads: What’s New?’, Annual Review of Anthropology, 13(1), pp. 275–300. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.13.100184.001423.
Trigger, Bruce G. (1991) ‘Distinguished lecture in archaeology: Constraint and freedom - A new synthesis for archaeological explanation’, American Anthropologist, 93(3), pp. 551–569.
Trigger, Bruce G. (1991) ‘Post‐processual developments in Anglo‐American archaeology’, Norwegian Archaeological Review, 24(2), pp. 65–76.
Trigger, B.G. (1995) ‘Expanding middle-range theory’, Antiquity, 69(264), pp. 449–458.
Trigger, B.G. (2003) ‘Hyper-relativism, responsibility and the Social Sciences’, in Artifacts & ideas: essays in archaeology. London: Transaction, pp. 113–131.
Trigger, B.G. (2006a) ‘Chapter 7’, in A history of archaeological thought. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813016.
Trigger, B.G. (2006b) ‘Chapter 8: Processualism and post-processualism’, in A history of archaeological thought. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813016.
Trigger, B.G. (2006c) ‘Chapter 9 and 10’, in A history of archaeological thought. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813016.
Trigger, B.G. (2006d) ‘Culture-historical archaeology’, in A history of archaeological thought. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 211–313.
Trigger, Bruce G. (2006a) A history of archaeological thought. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Available at: https://doi-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/10.1017/CBO9780511813016.
Trigger, Bruce G. (2006b) A history of archaeological thought. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Available at: https://doi-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/10.1017/CBO9780511813016.
Tringham, R. (2000) ‘Engendered places in prehistory’, in Interpretive archaeology: a reader. London: Leicester University Press, pp. 329–357.
Ucko, Peter J. and Theoretical Archaeology Group (1994) Theory in archaeology: a world perspective. London: Routledge.
Ucko, P.J. and Layton, R. (1999) ‘Introduction: gazing on the landscape and encountering the environment’, in The archaeology and anthropology of landscape: shaping your landscape. London: Routledge, pp. 1–20.
Urban, Patricia A. and Schortman, Edward M. (2012) Archaeological theory in practice. Walnut Creek, Calif: Left Coast Press.
Van Dyke, Ruth and Alcock, Susan E. (2003) Archaeologies of memory. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
VanPool, C.S. and VanPool, T.L. (1999) ‘The scientific nature of post-processualism’, American Antiquity, 64(1), pp. 33–53.
VanPool, T.L. and VanPool, C.S. (2001) ‘Postprocessualism and the nature of science: A response to comments by Hutson and Arnold and Wilkens’, American Antiquity, 66(2), pp. 367–375.
VanPool, T.L. and VanPool, C.S. (2003) ‘Agency and evolution: the role of intended and unintended consequences of action’, in Essential tensions in archaeological method and theory. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press, pp. 89–113.
VanPool, Todd L. and VanPool, Christine S. (2003) Essential tensions in archaeological method and theory. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.
Wagstaff, J. Malcolm (1987) Landscape and culture: geographical and archaeological perspectives. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Watson, P.J. (2008) ‘Processualism and after’, in Handbook of archaeological theories. Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press, pp. 29–38.
Watts, C.M. (2013) Relational archaeologies: humans, animals, things. London: Routledge.
Webmoor, T. and Witmore, C.L. (2008) ‘Things Are Us! A Commentary on Human/Things Relations under the Banner of a “Social” Archaeology’, Norwegian Archaeological Review, 41(1), pp. 53–70. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/00293650701698423.
Webster, G. (2008) ‘Culture history: a culture-historical approach’, in Handbook of archaeological theories. Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press, pp. 11–27. Available at: https://www.vlebooks.com/Product/Index/156042?page=0&startBookmarkId=-1.
Wheatley, D. (1995) ‘Cumulative viewshed analysis: a GIS-based method for investigating inter-visibility and its archaeological implication’, in Archaeology and geographical information systems: a European perspective. Bristol, PA: Taylor & Francis, pp. 171–186.
Wheeler, Robert Eric Mortimer (1954) Archaeology from the earth. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Whitehouse, R. (1998) ‘Feminism and archaeology: An awkward relationship’, Papers from the Institute of Archaeology, 9, pp. 1–7.
Whitehouse, R. (2011) ‘Cultural and biological approaches to the body in archaeology: can they be reconciled?" ’, in Evolutionary and interpretive archaeologies: a dialogue. Walnut Creek, Calif: Left Coast, pp. 227–244.
Whitley, J. (2013) ‘Homer’s Entangled Objects: Narrative, Agency and Personhood In and Out of Iron Age Texts’, Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 23(03), pp. 395–416. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S095977431300053X.
Whittle, A., Bayliss, A. and Healy, F. (2008) ‘The Timing and Tempo of Change: Examples from the Fourth Millennium cal. BC in Southern England’, Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 18(01), pp. 65–70. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959774308000061.
Wiessner, P. (1989) ‘Style and changing relations between the individual and society’, in The meanings of things: material culture and symbolic expression. London: Unwin Hyman, HarperCollins Academic, pp. 56–63.
Wilkinson, D. (2013) ‘The Emperor’s New Body: Personhood, Ontology and the Inka Sovereign’, Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 23(03), pp. 417–432. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959774313000541.
Wilmott, T. (1995) ‘Collapse theory and the end of Birdoswald’, in Theoretical Roman archaeology: second conference proceedings. Aldershot: Avebury, pp. 59–69.
Wilmott, Tony and English Heritage (2009) Hadrian’s Wall: archaeological research by English Heritage 1976-2000. Swindon: English Heritage.
Winterhalder, B. et al. (2010) ‘Ideal free settlement of California’s Northern Channel Islands’, Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 29(4), pp. 469–490. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaa.2010.07.001.
Witcher, R. (2010) ‘The Fabulous Tales of the Common People, Part 1: Representing Hadrian’s Wall’, Public Archaeology, 9(3), pp. 126–152. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1179/146551810X12822101587138.
Witcher, R., Tolia-Kelly, D.P. and Hingley, R. (2010) ‘Archaeologies of Landscape: Excavating the Materialities of Hadrian’s Wall’, Journal of Material Culture, 15(1), pp. 105–128. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1359183510355228.
Wobst, H.M. (1977) ‘Stylistic behavior ad information exchange’, in For the director: research essays in honor of James B. Griffin. Ann Arbor: Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan, pp. 317–342.
Wobst, H.M. (1999) ‘Style in archaeology or archaeologists in style’, in Material meanings: critical approaches to the interpretation of material culture. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press, pp. 118–132.
Wylie, A. (1985) ‘The reaction against analogy’, Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory, 8, pp. 63–111.
Wylie, A. (1989) ‘The interpretive dilemma’, in Critical traditions in contemporary archaeology: essays in the philosophy, history and socio-politics of archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 18–27.
Wylie, A. (1991) ‘Gender theory and the archaeological record: Why is there no archaeology of gender?’, in Engendering archaeology: women and prehistory. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 31–54.
Wylie, A. (1992) ‘On “heavily decomposing red herrings”. Scientific method in archaeology and the ladening of evidence with theory’, in Metaarchaeology: reflections by archaeologists and philosophers. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 145–157.
Wylie, Alison (1992a) ‘The interplay of evidential constraints and political interests: Recent archaeological research on gender’, American Antiquity, 57(1), pp. 15–35.
Wylie, Alison (1992b) ‘The interplay of evidential constraints and political interests: Recent archaeological research on gender’, American Antiquity, 57(1), pp. 15–35.
Wylie, A. (1995) ‘Alternative histories. Epistemic disunity and political integrity’, in Making alternative histories: the practice of archaeology and history in non-Western settings. Santa Fe, N.M: School of American Research Press, pp. 255–272.
Yates, T. (1992) ‘Frameworks for an archaeology of the body’, in Interpretative archaeology. New York: Berg, pp. 31–72.
Yoffee, Norman and Sherratt, Andrew (1993) Archaeological theory: who sets the agenda? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Zarankin, Andrés, Salerno, Melisa A., and Funari, Pedro Paulo A. (2009) Memories from darkness: archaeology of repression and resistance in Latin America. London: Springer. Available at: https://doi-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/10.1007/978-1-4419-0679-3.
Zimmerman, Larry J., Vitelli, Karen D., and Hollowell-Zimmer, Julie (2003) Ethical issues in archaeology. Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira Press.