Bibliography for ARCLG193: Themes, Thought and Theory in World Archaeology: Foundations: Todd Whitelaw BETA

Binford, L.R. (1962) ‘Archaeology as Anthropology’, American Antiquity, 28(2), pp. 217–225.

Binford, L.R. (1981) ‘Behavioral Archaeology and the “Pompeii Premise”’, Journal of Anthropological Research, 37(3), pp. 195–208.

Binford, S.R. and Binford, L.R. (1968) ‘Archaeological perspectives’, in New perspectives in archaeology. Chicago: Aldine, pp. 5–32.

Brumfiel, E. (no date) ‘Distinguished lecture in archaeology: breaking and entering the ecosystem – gender, class and faction steal the show’, American anthropologist, 94, pp. 551–567.

Childe, V.G. (1935) ‘Changing aims and methods in prehistory’, Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society, 1, pp. 115–115.

Clarke, D. (1973) ‘Archaeology: the loss of innocence’, Antiquity, 47(185), pp. 6–18.

Clarke, D. (no date) ‘Archaeology: the loss of innocence’, Antiquity, 47(185), pp. 6–18. Available at: http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=9413911&fulltextType=RA&fileId=S0003598X0003461X.

Dunnell, R.C. (1988) ‘The concept of progress in cultural evolution’, in Evolutionary progress. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 169–194.

Earle, T.K. (2002) ‘Political domination and social evolution’, in Companion encyclopedia of anthropology. [New ed.]. London: Routledge, pp. 940–961.

Flannery, K.V. (no date) ‘The cultural evolution of civilizations’, Annual review of ecology and systematics, 3, pp. 339–426.

Gardner, A. (2008) ‘Agency’, in Handbook of archaeological theories. Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press, pp. 95–108.

Hegmon, M. (2003) ‘Setting Theoretical Egos Aside: Issues and Theory in North American Archaeology’, American Antiquity, 68(2), pp. 213–243.

Hodder, I. (1985) ‘Post-processual archaeology’, in Advances in archaeological method and theory: v.8. London: Academic Press, pp. 1–26.

Hodder, I. (1991) ‘Interpretive Archaeology and Its Role’, American Antiquity, 56(1), pp. 7–18.

Hodder, I. (1992) ‘Theoretical archaeology: a reactionary view’, in Theory and practice in archaeology. London: Routledge, pp. 92–121. Available at: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=de8a3e97-5136-e711-80c9-005056af4099.

Hodder, I. (1999) ‘Towards a reflexive method’, in The archaeological process: an introduction. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 80–104.

Hodder, I. (2012) ‘Introduction: contemporary theoretical debate in archaeology’, in Archaeological theory today. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Polity, pp. 1–13.

Hodder, Ian and Hutson, Scott (2003) Reading the past: current approaches to interpretation in archaeology. 3rd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Johnson, M (1999) ‘Ch. 7: Postprocessual and interpretative archaeologies’, in Archaeological theory: an introduction. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 98–115.

Johnson, Matthew (1999a) ‘Common sense is not enough’, in Archaeological theory: an introduction. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 1–11.

Johnson, Matthew (1999b) ‘Postprocessual and interpretative archaeologies’, in Archaeological theory: an introduction. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 98–115.

Johnson, Matthew (2010) Archaeological theory: an introduction. 2nd ed. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.

Leone, M.P. (1987) ‘Toward a Critical Archaeology’, Current Anthropology, 28(3), pp. 283–302.

Miller, D. and Tilley, C. (1984) ‘Ideology, power and prehistory: an introduction’, in Ideology, power and prehistory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–15. Available at: https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/ideology-power-and-prehistory/487F9B328580F351C6B97FA48110BB97.

O’Brien, Michael J., Lyman, R. Lee, and Schiffer, Michael B. (2005) Archaeology as a process: processualism and its progeny. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.

Patrik, L. (1985) ‘Is there an archaeological record?’, in Advances in archaeological method and theory: v.8. London: Academic Press, pp. 27–62.

Preucel, R. and Bauer, A. (no date) ‘Archaeological pragmatics’, Norwegian archaeological review, 34, pp. 85–96.

Preucel, R. and Mrozowski, S. (2010) ‘Introduction’, in Contemporary archaeology in theory: the new pragmatism. 2nd ed. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 3–49.

Renfrew, C. (1994) ‘Towards a cognitive archaeology’, in The ancient mind: elements of cognitive archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3–12.

Robb, J. (no date) ‘The archaeology of symbols.’, Annual review of anthropology, 27, pp. 329–346.

Schiffer, M.B. (1972) ‘Archaeological Context and Systemic Context’, American Antiquity, 37(2), pp. 156–165.

Shanks, M. and Tilley, C. (1989) ‘Archaeology into the 1990s’, Norwegian Archaeological Review, 22(1), pp. 1–12. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/00293652.1989.9965480.

Shott, M. (no date) ‘Status and role of formation theory in contemporary archaeological practice’, Journal of archaeological research, 6, pp. 299–329.

Tilley, C. (1989) ‘Interpreting material culture’, in The meanings of things: material culture and symbolic expression. London: Routledge, pp. 185–194.

Trigger, B. (2006) ‘Culture-historical archaeology’, in A history of archaeological thought. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 211–313.

Trigger, B.G. (1978) ‘Current trends in American archaeology’, in Time and traditions: essays in archaeological interpretation. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, pp. 2–18.

Trigger, B.G. (1993) ‘Marxism in contemporary western archaeology’, in Archaeological method and theory v.5. Tucson: University of Arizona Press, pp. 159–200.

Trigger, Bruce G. (2006a) A history of archaeological thought. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Trigger, Bruce G. (2006b) A history of archaeological thought. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Webster, G. (2008) ‘Culture history: a culture-historical approach’, in Handbook of archaeological theories. Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press, pp. 11–27.

Willey, G.R., Phillips, Philip and Phillips, P. (1958) ‘Ch. 1: Archaeological unit concepts’, in Method and theory in American archaeology. Chicago: Chicago University Press, pp. 11–57.

Wylie, A. (1993) ‘A proliferation of new archaeologies: “beyond objectivism and relatisivm”’, in Archaeological theory: who sets the agenda? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 20–26.

Yoffee, N. (1993) Too many chiefs? (Or safe texts for the 1990s), Archaeological theory: who sets the agenda? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 60–78.

Yoffee, N. and Sherratt, A. (1993) ‘Introduction: the source of archaeological theory’, in Archaeological theory: who sets the agenda? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–10.