Bibliography for ANTHGC25: Advanced Topics in Digital Culture BETA

» Abildegaard et al (2017) Five recent play dates - EASST (no date). Available at: https://easst.net/article/five-recent-play-dates/.

‘Abramson, Allen. (2016) What in/is the world in/of Big Data? Theorizing the Contemporary, Cultural Anthropology’ (no date). Available at: https://culanth.org/fieldsights/833-what-in-is-the-world-is-of-big-data.

Adams, V. (2016) Metrics. Duke University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822374480.

After Kinship by Janet Carsten (no date a). Available at: https://www-cambridge-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/core/books/after-kinship/BF660970EC79E6A4847E76A38CBE1DB9.

After Kinship by Janet Carsten (no date b). Available at: https://www-cambridge-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/core/books/after-kinship/BF660970EC79E6A4847E76A38CBE1DB9.

Amoore, L. (2006) ‘Biometric borders: Governing mobilities in the war on terror’, Political Geography, 25(3), pp. 336–351. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2006.02.001.

Amoore, L. (2011) ‘Data Derivatives: On the Emergence of a Security Risk Calculus for Our Times’, Theory, Culture & Society, 28(6), pp. 24–43. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276411417430.

Anderson, K. et al. (2009) ‘Numbers Have Qualities Too: Experiences with Ethno-Mining’, Ethnographic Praxis in Industry Conference Proceedings, 2009(1), pp. 123–140. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-8918.2009.tb00133.x.

Anna Tsing (2000) ‘The Global Situation’, Cultural Anthropology, 15(3), pp. 327–360. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/656606?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.

Annelise Riles (1998a) ‘Infinity within the Brackets’, American Ethnologist, 25(3), pp. 378–398. Available at: http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/645790?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.

Annelise Riles (1998b) ‘Infinity within the Brackets’, American Ethnologist, 25(3), pp. 378–398. Available at: http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/645790?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.

Annette B. Weiner (1985) ‘Inalienable Wealth’, American Ethnologist, 12(2), pp. 210–227. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/644217?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.

Arturo Escobar (1999) ‘After Nature Steps to an Antiessentialist Political Ecology’, Current Anthropology, 40(1), pp. 1–30. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/515799?sid=primo&origin=crossref&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.

Asdal, K. (2008) ‘Enacting things through numbers: Taking nature into account/ing’, Geoforum, 39(1), pp. 123–132. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2006.11.004.

Beaulieu, A. (2004) ‘From brainbank to database: the informational turn in the study of the brain’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 35(2), pp. 367–390. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsc.2004.03.011.

Beer, D. (2015) ‘Productive measures: Culture and measurement in the context of everyday neoliberalism’, Big Data & Society, 2(1). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951715578951.

Beer, D. (2016) ‘How should we do the history of Big Data?’, Big Data & Society, 3(1). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716646135.

Beer, D. and Burrows, R. (2013) ‘Popular Culture, Digital Archives and the New Social Life of Data’, Theory, Culture & Society, 30(4), pp. 47–71. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276413476542.

Biagioli, M. (2012) ‘Between Knowledge And Technology: Patenting Methods, Rethinking Materiality’, Anthropological Forum, 22(3), pp. 285–299. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/00664677.2012.724009.

Biagioli, M. (2013) ‘Rights or rewards? Changing frameworks of scientific authorship’, in Scientific authorship: credit and intellectual property in science. New York: Routledge, pp. 253–281. Available at: http://www.tandfebooks.com/ISBN/9780203954270.

Birchall, C. (2016) ‘Shareveillance: Subjectivity between open and closed data’, Big Data & Society, 3(2). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716663965.

Blok, A. and Pedersen, M.A. (2014) ‘Complementary social science? Quali-quantitative experiments in a Big Data world’, Big Data & Society, 1(2). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951714543908.

Boellstorff, T. (2012) ‘Rethinking Digital Anthropology’, in Digital anthropology. London: Berg. Available at: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780857852922.

Boellstorff, T. and Maurer, B. (eds) (2015a) ‘Boellstorff, T. (2015) Making Big Data’, in Data, now bigger and better! Chicago: Prickly Paradigm Press.

Boellstorff, T. and Maurer, B. (eds) (2015b) ‘Seaver, N. (2015) Bastard Algebra’, in Data, now bigger and better! Chicago: Prickly Paradigm Press.

Bowker, G. (2005) ‘Databasing the world: Biodiversity and the 2000s’, in Memory practices in the sciences. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, pp. 107–136. Available at: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=4bbefe35-4f36-e711-80c9-005056af4099.

Bowker, G.C. (2014) ‘The Theory/Data Thing’, International Journal of Communication, 8. Available at: http://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/2190.

Bowker, G.C. and Star, S.L. (1999) Sorting things out: classification and its consequences. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press. Available at: http://cognet.mit.edu/book/sorting-things-out.

boyd, danah and Crawford, K. (2012) ‘CRITICAL QUESTIONS FOR BIG DATA’, Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), pp. 662–679. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.678878.

Breiger, R.L. (2015) ‘Scaling down’, Big Data & Society, 2(2). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951715602497.

Brine, K.R. and Poovey, M. (2013) ‘From Measuring Desire to Quantifying Expectations: A Late Nineteenth- Century Effort to Marry Economic Theory and Data’, in ‘Raw data’ is an oxymoron. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press. Available at: https://ieeexplore-ieee-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/servlet/opac?bknumber=6451327.

Brown, D. and Nicholas, G. (2012) ‘Protecting indigenous cultural property in the age of digital democracy: Institutional and communal responses to Canadian First Nations and Maori heritage concerns’, Journal of Material Culture, 17(3), pp. 307–324. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1359183512454065.

Browne, S. (2015) Dark Matters. Duke University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822375302.

Büscher, B. (2013) ‘Nature 2.0’, Geoforum, 44, pp. 1–3. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2012.08.004.

Büscher, B. (2016) ‘Nature 2.0: Exploring and theorizing the links between new media and nature conservation’, New Media & Society, 18(5), pp. 726–743. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814545841.

Candea, M. (2007) ‘Arbitrary locations: in defence of the bounded field-site’, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 13(1), pp. 167–184. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9655.2007.00419.x.

Cheney-Lippold, J. (2011) ‘A New Algorithmic Identity’, Theory, Culture & Society, 28(6), pp. 164–181. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276411424420.

Chua, L. and Salmond, A. (2012) ‘Artefacts in anthropology’, in The SAGE handbook of social anthropology. Los Angeles: SAGE, pp. 101–114. Available at: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=11445b7c-8636-e711-80c9-005056af4099.

Chun, W.H.K. (2008) ‘The Enduring Ephemeral, or the Future Is a Memory’, Critical Inquiry, 35(1), pp. 148–171. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1086/595632.

Coopmans, C. (2014) ‘Visual analytics as artful revelation’, in C. Coopmans (ed.) Representation in scientific practice revisited. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt9qf5hv.6?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.

Couldry, N. and Powell, A. (2014) ‘Big Data from the bottom up’, Big Data & Society, 1(2). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951714539277.

D. Haggerty, Richard V. Ericson, K. (2000) ‘The surveillant assemblage’, British Journal of Sociology, 51(4), pp. 605–622. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/00071310020015280.

D. Miller (2001) ‘Alienable Gifts and Inalienable Commodities’, in The empire of things: regimes of value and material culture. Santa Fe, N.M.: School of American Research Press.

Dalsgaard, S. (2013) ‘The commensurability of carbon’, HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 3(1), pp. 80–98. Available at: https://doi.org/10.14318/hau3.1.006.

Dalsgaard, S. and Nielsen, M. (2013) ‘Introduction: Time and the Field’, Social Analysis, 57(1), pp. 1–19. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3167/sa.2013.570101.

Dawn Nafus (2014) ‘Big Data, Big Questions - This One Does Not Go Up To 11: The Quantified Self Movement as an Alternative Big Data Practice’, International Journal of Communication, 8. Available at: http://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/2170.

‘Dourish, P. (2014) No SQL: The Shifting Materialities of Databases. Computational Culture: a Journal of Software Studies. Issue 4.’ (no date). Available at: http://computationalculture.net/article/no-sql-the-shifting-materialities-of-database-technology.

Elizabeth A. Povinelli (2011) ‘The Woman on the Other Side of the Wall: Archiving the Otherwise in Postcolonial Digital Archives’, Differences: A Journal Of Feminist Cultural Studies, 22(1), pp. 146–171. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1215/10407391-1218274.

Emily Martin (1992) ‘The End of the Body?’, American Ethnologist, 19(1), pp. 121–140. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/644828?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.

Evelyn Ruppert (2011) ‘Population Objects: Interpassive Subjects’, Sociology, 45(2), pp. 218–233. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/42857535?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.

Fairhead, J., Leach, M. and Scoones, I. (2012) ‘Green Grabbing: a new appropriation of nature?’, Journal of Peasant Studies, 39(2), pp. 237–261. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2012.671770.

Faubion, J.D. and Marcus, G.E. (2009) Fieldwork is not what it used to be: learning anthropology’s method in a time of transition. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

Floridi, L. (2007) ‘A Look into the Future Impact of ICT on Our Lives’, The Information Society, 23(1), pp. 59–64. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/01972240601059094.

Ford, H. (2014) ‘Big Data and Small: Collaborations between ethnographers and data scientists’, Big Data & Society, 1(2). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951714544337.

Fortun, K. et al. (2016) ‘Pushback: Critical data designers and pollution politics’, Big Data & Society, 3(2). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716668903.

Franklin, S. (2001) ‘Biologization Re-visited: Kinship Theory’, in Relative values: reconfiguring kinship studies. Durham [N.C.]: Duke University Press, pp. 302–325. Available at: https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma9931045211204761&context=L&vid=44UCL_INST:UCL_VU2&lang=en&search_scope=MyInst_and_CI&adaptor=Local%20Search%20Engine&isFrbr=true&tab=Everything&query=any,contains,Relative%20values:%20reconfiguring%20kinship%20studies&sortby=date_d&facet=frbrgroupid,include,61215140135456524&offset=0.

Franklin, S. (2003) ‘Re-thinking nature-culture: Anthropology and the new genetics’, Anthropological Theory, 3(1), pp. 65–85. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1463499603003001752.

Fujimara, J. (1999) ‘The Practice of Producing Meaning in Bioinformatics’, in The practices of human genetics. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic, pp. 49–87.

Fuller, M. and Goffey, A. (2012) ‘Digital Infrastructures and the Machinery of Topological Abstraction’, Theory, Culture & Society, 29(4–5), pp. 311–333. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276412450466.

Fuller, M and Goffey, A. (2012) ‘Leak early, leak often’, in Evil media. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press, pp. 100–104. Available at: https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=15040989580004761&institutionId=4761&customerId=4760&VE=true.

Gabrys, J. (2016) Program earth: environmental sensing technology and the making of a computational planet. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5749/j.ctt1b7x5gq.

Gabrys, J., Pritchard, H. and Barratt, B. (2016) ‘Just good enough data: Figuring data citizenships through air pollution sensing and data stories’, Big Data & Society, 3(2). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716679677.

Garnett, E. (2016) ‘Developing a feeling for error: Practices of monitoring and modelling air pollution data’, Big Data & Society, 3(2). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716658061.

Geismar, H. and Mohns, W. (2011) ‘Social relationships and digital relationships: rethinking the database at the Vanuatu Cultural Centre’, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 17, pp. S133–S155. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9655.2011.01693.x.

George E. Marcus and Marcelo Pisarro (2008) ‘The End(s) of Ethnography: Social/Cultural Anthropology’s Signature Form of Producing Knowledge in Transition’, Cultural Anthropology, 23(1), pp. 1–14. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20484493?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.

Gerlitz, C. and Lury, C. (2014) ‘Social media and self-evaluating assemblages: on numbers, orderings and values’, Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory, 15(2), pp. 174–188. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/1600910X.2014.920267.

Gilles Deleuze (1992) ‘Postscript on the Societies of Control’, October, 59, pp. 3–7. Available at: http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/778828?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.

Gitelman, L. (2013) ‘Raw data’ is an oxymoron. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press. Available at: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/bkabstractplus.jsp?bkn=6451327.

Grebowicz, M. (2014) ‘Glacial Time and Lonely Crowds:The social effects of climate change as internet spectacle’, Environmental Humanities, 5, pp. 1–11. Available at: http://environmentalhumanities.org/archives/vol5/.

Greenfield, D. (2016) Deep Data: Notes on the n of 1. In ‘Quantified: biosensing technologies in everyday life’ ed. Dawn Nafus. MIT Press (no date). Available at: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/xpl/ebooks/bookPdfWithBanner.jsp?fileName=7580296.pdf&bkn=7580015&pdfType=chapter.

Gregg, M. (2015) ‘The Gift That Is Not Given’, in T. Boellstorff and B. Maurer (eds) Data, now bigger and better! Chicago: Prickly Paradigm Press.

Gregory, C.A. (1982) Gifts and commodities. London: Academic Press.

Gross, A. (2011) ‘The economy of social data: exploring research ethics as device’, The Sociological Review, 59, pp. 113–129. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2012.02055.x.

Hacking, I. (1990) ‘The argument’, in The Taming of Chance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–10. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511819766.

Halpern, O. (2014a) Beautiful data: a history of vision and reason since 1945. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.

Halpern, O. (2014b) ‘Cybernetic rationality’, Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory, 15(2), pp. 223–238. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/1600910X.2014.923320.

Halpern, O. (2015) Beautiful Data. Duke University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822376323-010.

Haraway, D. (1997) ‘Chapter 4: Gene’, in Modest₋Witness@Second₋Millennium.FemaleMan₋Meets₋OncoMouse: feminism and technoscience. New York: Routledge.

Harvey, P. (2012) ‘The Topological Quality of Infrastructural Relation: An Ethnographic Approach’, Theory, Culture & Society, 29(4–5), pp. 76–92. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276412448827.

Helmond, A. (2014) ‘“Raw data” is an oxymoron’, Information, Communication & Society, 17(9), pp. 1171–1173. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2014.920042.

Helmreich, S. (2002) ‘Kinship in Hypertext’, in Relative values: reconfiguring kinship studies. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press, pp. 116–143. Available at: http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=UCL&isbn=9780822383222.

Helmreich, S. (2007) ‘Blue-green Capital, Biotechnological Circulation and an Oceanic Imaginary: A Critique of Biopolitical Economy’, BioSocieties, 2(3), pp. 287–302. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1745855207005753.

Hilgartner, S. (2012) ‘Selective flows of knowledge in technoscientific interaction: information control in genome research’, The British Journal for the History of Science, 45(02), pp. 267–280. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007087412000106.

Hirsch, E. and Strathern, M. (2004) Transactions and creations: property debates and the stimulus of Melanesia. New York: Berghahn Books. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctv287skdk.

Hogan, M. (2015) ‘Data flows and water woes: The Utah Data Center’, Big Data & Society, 2(2). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951715592429.

Hui, Y. (2012) ‘What is a Digital Object?’, Metaphilosophy, 43(4), pp. 380–395. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9973.2012.01761.x.

Igoe, J. (2010) ‘The spectacle of nature in the global economy of appearances: Anthropological engagements with the spectacular mediations of transnational conservation’, Critique of Anthropology, 30(4), pp. 375–397. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0308275X10372468.

Isin, E and Ruppert E (2017) Citizen Snowden. International Journal of Communication 11 843-857 (no date a). Available at: http://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/viewFile/5642/1934.

Isin, E and Ruppert E (2017) Citizen Snowden. International Journal of Communication 11 843-857 (no date b). Available at: http://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/viewFile/5642/1934.

J. Holt and Patrick Vondereau (2014) ‘Where the Internet Lives: Data Centers as Cloud Infrastructure’, in Traffic signal timing manual. [Washington, D.C.]: U.S. Department of Transportation. Available at: http://app.knovel.com/hotlink/toc/id:kpTSTMPNF2/traffic_signal_timing_manual_publication_no_fhwahop08024.

Jackson Jr., J.L. (no date) ‘Ethnography is, ethnography ain’t’, Cultural Anthropology, 27(3), pp. 480–497. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1360.2012.01155.x.

Jensen, C.B. and Morita, A. (2015) ‘Infrastructures as Ontological Experiments’, Engaging Science, Technology, and Society, 1, pp. 81–87. Available at: http://estsjournal.org/article/view/21.

JIMÉNEZ, A.C. (2008) ‘Relations and disproportions: The labor of scholarship in the knowledge economy’, American Ethnologist, 35(2), pp. 229–242. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1425.2008.00035.x.

John, N.A. (2013) ‘Sharing and Web 2.0: The emergence of a keyword’, New Media & Society, 15(2), pp. 167–182. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444812450684.

Kaufmann, M. (2015) ‘Resilience 2.0: social media use and (self-)care during the 2011 Norway attacks’, Media, Culture & Society, 37(7), pp. 972–987. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443715584101.

Kelty, C., Coleman, G. and Strassler, K. (2012) Commentary and Discussion on the Digital Form Curated Collection, Curated Collections, Cultural Anthropology Online. Available at: http://www.culanth.org/curated_collections/8-the-digital-form/discussions/15-commentary-and-discussion-on-the-digital-form-curated-collection.

Kelty, C.M. (2012) ‘This is not an article: Model organism newsletters and the question of “open science”’, BioSocieties, 7(2), pp. 140–168. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1057/biosoc.2012.8.

Kim Fortun (2004) ‘From Bhopal to the Informating of Environmentalism: Risk Communication in Historical Perspective’, Osiris, 19, pp. 283–296. Available at: http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/3655245?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.

Kirstie Ball ; Kevin D. Haggend David Lyon (no date) ‘Bruno, Fernanda. (2012) Surveillance and Participation on Web 2.0.’, in Routledge Handbook of Surveillance Studies. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203814949.

Kitchin, R. (2014) ‘Big Data, new epistemologies and paradigm shifts’, Big Data & Society, 1(1). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951714528481.

Knox, H. (2015) ‘Carbon, Convertibility, and the Technopolitics of Oil’, in H. Appel, A. Mason, and M. Watts (eds) Subterranean estates: life worlds of oil and gas. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. Available at: https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma9931090819204761&context=L&vid=44UCL_INST:UCL_VU2&lang=en&search_scope=MyInst_and_CI&adaptor=Local%20Search%20Engine&isFrbr=true&tab=Everything&query=any,contains,990022437450204761&sortby=date_d&facet=frbrgroupid,include,9022657445453213247&offset=0.

Laidlaw, J. (2000) ‘A free gift makes no friends’, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 6(4), pp. 617–634. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9655.00036.

Lake, R.W. (2017) ‘Big Data, urban governance, and the ontological politics of hyperindividualism’, Big Data & Society, 4(1). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716682537.

Lash, S. (2007) ‘Power after Hegemony: Cultural Studies in Mutation?’, Theory, Culture & Society, 24(3), pp. 55–78. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276407075956.

Latour, B. (1999) ‘Circulating Reference’, in Pandora’s hope: essays on the reality of science studies. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, pp. 24–79. Available at: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=3281174a-6036-e711-80c9-005056af4099.

Latour, B. et al. (2012) ‘“The whole is always smaller than its parts” - a digital test of Gabriel Tardes’ monads’, The British Journal of Sociology, 63(4), pp. 590–615. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-4446.2012.01428.x.

Leach, J. (2011) ‘The Self of the Scientist, Material for the Artist: Emergent Distinctionsin an Interdisciplinary Collaboration’, Social Analysis, 55(3). Available at: https://doi.org/10.3167/sa.2011.550308.

Lehning, M., Dawes, N. and Bavay et. al., M. (no date) ‘Instrumenting the earth: Next-generation sensor networks and environmental science’, in The fourth paradigm: data-intensive scientific discovery. Redmond, Wash: Microsoft Research, pp. 45–51.

Leonelli, S. (2013) ‘Why the Current Insistence on Open Access to Scientific Data? Big Data, Knowledge Production, and the Political Economy of Contemporary Biology’, Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 33(1–2), pp. 6–11. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0270467613496768.

Lezaun, J. and Montgomery, C.M. (2015) ‘The Pharmaceutical Commons: Sharing and Exclusion in Global Health Drug Development’, Science, Technology & Human Values, 40(1), pp. 3–29. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243914542349.

Lippert, I. (2015) ‘Environment as datascape: Enacting emission realities in corporate carbon accounting’, Geoforum, 66, pp. 126–135. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2014.09.009.

Lupton, D. (2013) ‘Quantifying the body: monitoring and measuring health in the age of mHealth technologies’, Critical Public Health, 23(4), pp. 393–403. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/09581596.2013.794931.

Lupton, D. (2014) ‘The commodification of patient opinion: the digital patient experience economy in the age of big data’, Sociology of Health & Illness, 36(6), pp. 856–869. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.12109.

Lupton, D. (no date) ‘Self-tracking modes: relflexive self-monitoring and data practices’, Social life of big data symposium 2nd June 2015. School of Communications and Arts, Edith Cowan University, Perth Western Australia. Available at: http://ro.ecu.edu.au/.

LYON, D. (2008) ‘BIOMETRICS, IDENTIFICATION AND SURVEILLANCE’, Bioethics, 22(9), pp. 499–508. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.00697.x.

Lyon, D. (2008) ‘Biometrics, Identification and Surveillance’, Bioethics, 22(9), pp. 499–508. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.00697.x.

Lyon, D. (2010) ‘Liquid Surveillance: The Contribution of Zygmunt Bauman to Surveillance Studies1’, International Political Sociology, 4(4), pp. 325–338. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-5687.2010.00109.x.

Lyon, D. (2014) ‘Surveillance, Snowden, and Big Data: Capacities, consequences, critique’, Big Data & Society, 1(2). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951714541861.

Mackenzie, A. (2003) ‘These Things Called Systems’, Social Studies of Science, 33(3), pp. 365–387. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/03063127030333003.

Mackenzie, A. (2014) ‘Multiplying numbers differently: an epidemiology of contagious convolution’, Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory, 15(2), pp. 189–207. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/1600910X.2014.922110.

Manovich, L. (1999) ‘Database as Symbolic Form’, Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 5(2), pp. 80–99. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/135485659900500206.

Marcus, G. (2010) ‘Holism and the Expectations of Critique in Post-1980s Anthropology; Notes and Queries, and an Epilogue’, in Experiments in holism: theory and practice in contemporary anthropology. Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 28–46. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781444324426.

Marcus, G.E. (1995) ‘Ethnography in/of the World System: The Emergence of Multi-Sited Ethnography’, Annual Review of Anthropology, 24(1), pp. 95–117. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.24.100195.000523.

MARCUS, G.E. (2012) ‘THE LEGACIES OF WRITING CULTURE AND THE NEAR FUTURE OF THE ETHNOGRAPHIC FORM: A Sketch’, Cultural Anthropology, 27(3), pp. 427–445. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1360.2012.01152.x.

MARILYN STRATHERN (2001) ‘VIRTUAL SOCIETY? GET REAL! Ashridge 4–5 May 2000: Conference of the “Virtual Society?: the Social Science of Electronic Technologies” Programme: Abstraction and decontextualisation: an anthropological comment’, The Cambridge Journal of Anthropology, 22(1), pp. 52–66. Available at: http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/23820353?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.

Marilyn Strathern (2001) ‘Virtual society? Get real! Ashridge 4–5 May 2000: Conference of the “Virtual Society?: the Social Science of Electronic Technologies” Programme: Abstraction and decontextualisation: an anthropological comment’, The Cambridge Journal of Anthropology, 22(1), pp. 52–66. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/23820353?seq=8#page_scan_tab_contents.

Marr, B. (21AD) The Difference Between Big Data and a Lot of Data. Data Informed. Available at: http://data-informed.com/.

Marres, N. and Weltevrede, E. (2013) ‘Scraping the social?’, Journal of Cultural Economy, 6(3), pp. 313–335. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/17530350.2013.772070.

Maurer, B. (2012) ‘Late to the party: debt and data’, Social Anthropology, 20(4), pp. 474–481. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8676.2012.00219.x.

Maurer, W.M. (2015) ‘Principles of Alliance and Descent for Big Data’, in. Prickly Paradigm Press/University of Chicago, pp. 67–86. Available at: http://escholarship.org/uc/item/41r1s161.

M’charek, A., Schramm, K. and Skinner, D. (2014) ‘Topologies of Race’, Science, Technology, & Human Values, 39(4), pp. 468–487. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243913509493.

McNally, R. et al. (2012) ‘Understanding the “Intensive” in “Data Intensive Research”: Data Flows in Next Generation Sequencing and Environmental Networked Sensors’, International Journal of Digital Curation, 7(1), pp. 81–94. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2218/ijdc.v7i1.216.

Mike Savage and Roger Burrows (2007) ‘The Coming Crisis of Empirical Sociology’, Sociology, 41(5), pp. 885–899. Available at: http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/42858273?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.

Nadim, T. (2016) ‘Blind regards: Troubling data and their sentinels’, Big Data & Society, 3(2). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716666301.

Nafus, D. (2014) ‘Stuck data, dead data, and disloyal data: the stops and starts in making numbers into social practices’, Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory, 15(2), pp. 208–222. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/1600910X.2014.920266.

Nafus, D. (2015) Data, Data, Everywhere, but Who Gets to Interpret It? | EPIC, EPIC. EPICPeople.org. Available at: https://www.epicpeople.org/data-data-everywhere/.

Nafus, D ; Sherman, J (no date) ‘This One Does Not Go Up to 11: The Quantified Self Movement as an Alternative Big Data Practice’. Available at: http://ucl-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo_library/libweb/action/display.do?tabs=detailsTab&ct=display&fn=search&doc=TN_wos000349010500023&indx=1&recIds=TN_wos000349010500023&recIdxs=0&elementId=0&renderMode=poppedOut&displayMode=full&frbrVersion=&frbg=&&dscnt=0&scp.scps=scope%3A%28UCL%29%2Cprimo_central_multiple_fe&tb=t&mode=Basic&vid=UCL_VU1&srt=rank&tab=local&dum=true&vl(freeText0)=%20Nafus%2C%20D.%20and%20J.%20Sherman%20%282014%29%20This%20One%20Does%20Not%20Go%20Up%20to%20Eleven%3A%20The%20Quantifed%20Self%20Movement%20as%20an%20Alternative%20Big%20Data%20Practice.%20International%20Journal%20of%20Communication%2C%20Vol%208.&dstmp=1471435285056.

Porter, T.M. (1995) Trust in numbers: the pursuit of objectivity in science and public life. Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press.

Publications | Sciences Po | MedialabSciences Po | Medialab (no date). Available at: http://www.medialab.sciences-po.fr/publication/.

Rabinow, P. (1996) Essays on the anthropology of reason. Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press.

Rapp, R. (2015) ‘Big data, small kids: Medico-scientific, familial and advocacy visions of human brains’, BioSocieties [Preprint]. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1057/biosoc.2015.33.

Richard Maxwell ; Jon Raundand Nina Lager Vestberg (no date) ‘Gabrys, J. (2015) Powering Ecologies: From Energy Ecologies to Electronic Environmentalism’, in Media and the Ecological Crisis: Routledge research in cultural and media studies 67.

Richardson, Sarah S. ; Stevens, Hallam (no date) ‘Fortun, M. (2015) What Toll Pursuit: Affective Assemblages in Genomics and Postgenomics’, in Postgenomics: Perspectives on Biology after the Genome. Available at: http://ucl-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo_library/libweb/action/display.do?frbrVersion=4&tabs=detailsTab&ct=display&fn=search&doc=TN_dawson9780822375449&indx=2&recIds=TN_dawson9780822375449&recIdxs=1&elementId=1&renderMode=poppedOut&displayMode=full&frbrVersion=4&frbg=&&dscnt=0&scp.scps=scope%3A%28UCL%29%2Cprimo_central_multiple_fe&tb=t&mode=Basic&vid=UCL_VU1&srt=rank&tab=local&dum=true&vl(freeText0)=Postgenomics%3A%20Perspectives%20on%20Biology%20After%20the%20Genome&dstmp=1471430773987.

Riles, A. (2001) The network inside out: Annelise Riles. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

Riles, A. (2006) ‘Introduction: in response’, in Documents: artifacts of modern knowledge. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, pp. 1–38.

Roderick, L. (2014) ‘Discipline and Power in the Digital Age: The Case of the US Consumer Data Broker Industry’, Critical Sociology, 40(5), pp. 729–746. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0896920513501350.

Rosemary J. Coombe and Andrew Herman (2004) ‘Rhetorical Virtues: Property, Speech, and the Commons on the World-Wide Web’, Anthropological Quarterly, 77(3), pp. 559–574. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3318236.

Rosenberg, D. (2013) ‘Data before the fact’, in L. Gitelman (ed.) ‘Raw data’ is an oxymoron. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press. Available at: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/servlet/opac?bknumber=6451327.

Rubio, F.D. and Baert, P. (eds) (2012) ‘Leach, J. (2012) “Step inside: knowledge freely available”: The politics of (making) knowledge-objects’.’, in The politics of knowledge. London: Routledge. Available at: https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781134004386.

Ruckenstein, M. (2014) ‘Visualized and Interacted Life: Personal Analytics and Engagements with Data Doubles’, Societies, 4(1), pp. 68–84. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/soc4010068.

Ruppert, E. (2011) ‘Population Objects: Interpassive Subjects’, Sociology, 45(2), pp. 218–233. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038510394027.

Ruppert, E. (2012) ‘The Governmental Topologies of Database Devices’, Theory, Culture & Society, 29(4–5), pp. 116–136. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276412439428.

Ruppert, E., Law, J. and Savage, M. (2013) ‘Reassembling Social Science Methods: The Challenge of Digital Devices’, Theory, Culture & Society, 30(4), pp. 22–46. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276413484941.

Ruppert, E. and Savage, M. (2011) ‘Transactional politics’, The Sociological Review, 59, pp. 73–92. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2012.02057.x.

S. Day and C. Lury (2016) ‘Biosensing: Tracking Persons.’, in Quantified:Biosensing Technologies in Everyday Life. MIT Press. Available at: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/xpl/ebooks/bookPdfWithBanner.jsp?fileName=7580073.pdf&bkn=7580015&pdfType=chapter.

Sabina Leonelli (2015) ‘What Counts as Scientific Data? A Relational Framework’, Philosophy of Science, 82(5), pp. 810–821. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/684083?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.

Salmond, A.J.M. (2013) ‘Transforming translations (part I)’, HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 3(3). Available at: https://doi.org/10.14318/hau3.3.002.

Seaver, N. (2015) ‘The nice thing about context is that everyone has it’, Media, Culture & Society, 37(7), pp. 1101–1109. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443715594102.

Seaver, N. (2017) ‘Algorithms as culture: Some tactics for the ethnography of algorithmic systems’, Big Data & Society, 4(2). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951717738104.

Shackley, S. and Wynne, B. (1996) ‘Representing Uncertainty in Global Climate Change Science and Policy: Boundary-Ordering Devices and Authority’, Science, Technology & Human Values, 21(3), pp. 275–302. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/016224399602100302.

Sharma, A. and Gupta, A. (2006) ‘Sharma, A. and Gupta, A. (2006) Introduction: Re-thinking Theories of the State in an Age of Globalization’, in The anthropology of the state: a reader. Malden, Mass: Blackwell.

Sharp, L.A. (2000) ‘The Commodification of the Body and its Parts’, Annual Review of Anthropology, 29(1), pp. 287–328. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.29.1.287.

Singer, N. (2015) ‘From knowing yourself to prodding yourself’, The New York Times [Preprint]. Available at: http://www.nexis.com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=5FSY-6451-JBG3-608X&csi=6742&oc=00240&perma=true.

Stefan Helmreich (2011) ‘From Spaceship Earth to Google Ocean: Planetary Icons, Indexes, and Infrastructures’, Social Research, 78(4), pp. 1211–1242. Available at: http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/23349849?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.

Steinmetz, G. (1999) ‘Mitchell, T. (1999) Society, Economy and the State Effect. In State/Culture: State Formation after the Cultural Turn.’, in State/culture: state-formation after the cultural turn. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press. Available at: https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=14616198260004761&institutionId=4761&customerId=4760&VE=true.

Strathern, M. (1987) ‘The Limits of Auto-anthropology’, in Anthropology at home. London: Tavistock Publications, pp. 16–37.

Strathern, M. (1992a) After nature: English kinship in the late twentieth century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Strathern, M. (1992b) ‘Parts and wholes: refiguring relationships in a post-plural world’, in Conceptualizing society. London: Routledge, pp. 75–106. Available at: http://www.tandfebooks.com/ISBN/9780203032244.

Strathern, M. (1999) ‘Chapter 1’, in Property, substance and effect: anthropological essays on persons and things. London: Athlone.

Strathern, M. (2000) ‘Environments within: An ethnographic commentary on scale’, in Culture, landscape, and the environment: the Linacre lectures, 1997. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 44–71.

Strathern, M. (2001) ‘The Patent and the Malanggan’, Theory, Culture & Society, 18(4), pp. 1–26. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/02632760122051850.

Strathern, Marilyn (2002) ‘Externalities in comparative guise’, Economy and Society, 31(2), pp. 250–267. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/03085140220123153.

Strathern, M. (2002) ‘On Space and Depth’, in Complexities: social studies of knowledge practices. Durham: Duke University Press. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/9780822383550.

Strathern, M. (2004) Partial connections. Updated ed. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.

Strathern, M. (2005) ‘Chapter 5: Losing (out on) Intellectual Resources’, in Kinship, Law and the Unexpected: Relatives are Always a Surprise. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 111–134. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511614514.

Strathern, M. and University of Cambridge. Department of Social Anthropology (1995) The relation: issues in complexity and scale. Cambridge, U.K.: Prickly Pear Press.

Striphas, T. (2015) ‘Algorithmic culture’, European Journal of Cultural Studies, 18(4–5), pp. 395–412. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549415577392.

Thacker, E. (2003) ‘What is Biomedia?’, Configurations, 11(1), pp. 47–79. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1353/con.2004.0014.

The End of Theory: The Data Deluge Makes the Scientific Method Obsolete | WIRED (no date). Available at: https://www.wired.com/2008/06/pb-theory/.

The World of Indicators edited by Richard Rottenburg (no date). Available at: https://www-cambridge-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/core/books/world-of-indicators/C7903E69E0329A256EF02C3CB5C918ED.

‘To the Cloud: Big Data in a Turbulent World’ (2015) Contemporary Sociology: A Journal of Reviews, 44(3), pp. 436–437. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0094306115579192c.

Tsing, Anna (2013) ‘Sorting out commodities: How capitalist value is made through gifts’, HAU : Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 3(1), pp. 21–43. Available at: https://search-proquest-com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/docview/1850088542?rfr_id=info%3Axri%2Fsid%3Aprimo.

Tutton, R. and Prainsack, B. (2011) ‘Enterprising or altruistic selves? Making up research subjects in genetics research’, Sociology of Health & Illness, 33(7), pp. 1081–1095. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9566.2011.01348.x.

Underberg, N.M. and Zorn, E. (2013) ‘Exploring Peruvian Culture through Multimedia Ethnography’, Visual Anthropology, 26(1), pp. 1–17. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/08949468.2013.734760.

Universitetet i Oslo (2005) State formation: anthropological perspectives. Edited by C. Krohn-Hansen and K.G. Nustad. London: Pluto Press. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt18fs5n7.

Van Dijck, J. (2000) ‘Digital cadavers: the visible human project as anatomical theater’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 31(2), pp. 271–285. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1369-8486(99)00020-5.

Van Dijck, J. and Poell, T. (2016) ‘Understanding the promises and premises of online health platforms’, Big Data & Society, 3(1). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716654173.

Velkova, J. (2016) ‘Data that warms: Waste heat, infrastructural convergence and the computation traffic commodity’, Big Data & Society, 3(2). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716684144.

Verran, H. (2009) ‘On assemblage’, Journal of Cultural Economy, 2(1–2), pp. 169–182. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/17530350903064188.

Verran, H. (2011) ‘The Changing Lives of Measures and Values: From Centre Stage in the Fading “Disciplinary” Society to Pervasive Background Instrument in the Emergent “Control” Society’, The Sociological Review, 59(2_suppl), pp. 60–72. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2012.02059.x.

Verran, H. (2014) ‘Number as Generative Device’, in C. Lury and N. Wakeford (eds) Inventive methods: the happening of the social. Abingdon: Routledge.

Vertesi, J. (2014) ‘My Experiment Opting Out of Big Data Made Me Look Like a Criminal.’, Time.com, pp. 1–1. Available at: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=bth&AN=95911990&site=ehost-live&scope=site.

Walford, A. (2012) ‘Data Moves: Taking Amazonian Climate Science Seriously’, The Cambridge Journal of Anthropology, 30(2). Available at: https://doi.org/10.3167/ca.2012.300207.

Weiner, A.B. (1992a) ‘Inalienable possessions: The forgotten dimension’, in Inalienable possessions: the paradox of keeping-while-giving. Berkeley: University of California Press, pp. 23–43. Available at: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=7cf9c98c-5836-e711-80c9-005056af4099.

Weiner, A.B. (1992b) ‘Reconfiguring Exchange Theory: The Maori Hau’, in Inalienable possessions: the paradox of keeping-while-giving. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Wendy F. Hsu (2016) ‘Hsu, W.F (2016) A Performative Digital Ethnography. In “The Routledge Companion to Digital Ethnography” eds. Hjorth, Horst, Galloway, Bell. Routledge’. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315673974.ch4.

Whitington, J. (2016) ‘Carbon as a Metric of the Human’, PoLAR: Political and Legal Anthropology Review, 39(1), pp. 46–63. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/plar.12130.

Why Big Data Needs Thick Data – Ethnography Matters – Medium (no date). Available at: https://medium.com/ethnography-matters/why-big-data-needs-thick-data-b4b3e75e3d7.