[1]
A. Cuthbert 2014. Chapter 6: Urban Design and Spatial Political Economy. Companion to Urban Design. Routledge.
[2]
A. Escobar 1996. The making and the unmaking of the third world through development. The post-development reader. Zed Books.
[3]
AbdouMaliq Simone , and Edgar Pieterse 2017. New Urban Worlds : Inhabiting Dissonant Times. Polity Press.
[4]
Abu-Orf, H. 2011. Is planning possible in cities divided by violent conflict? International Development Planning Review. 33, 3 (Jan. 2011), 321–342. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3828/idpr.2011.16.
[5]
Akhil Gupta and Ferguson, D. Discipline and Practice:"The Field” As Site, Method, and Location In Anthropology. … locations: Boundaries and grounds of a ….
[6]
Al-Harithy, H. 2015. The participative discourse: community activism in post-war reconstruction. Urban design in the Arab world: reconceptualizing boundaries. R. Saliba, ed. Ashgate. 39–50.
[7]
Amir, S. 2004. Rethinking Design Policy in the Third World. Design Issues. 20, 4 (2004), 68–75. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1162/0747936042311995.
[8]
Appadurai, A. 2001. Deep democracy: urban governmentality and the horizon of politics. Environment and Urbanization. 13, 2 (2001), 23–43. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/095624780101300203.
[9]
Awan, N. et al. 2011. Chapter 3: The operations of spatial agency. Spatial agency: other ways of doing architecture. Routledge. 69–82.
[10]
Barry, J. et al. 2018. Unsettling planning theory. Planning Theory. 17, 3 (Aug. 2018), 418–438. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095218763842.
[11]
Bell, B. and Wakeford, K. 2008. Expanding architecture: design as activism. Metropolis Books.
[12]
Blundell Jones, P. et al. eds. 2012. Architecture and participation. Routledge.
[13]
Blunt, A. and Dowling, R.M. 2006. Setting up home: an introduction. Home. Routledge. 1–31.
[14]
Boano, C. and Talocci, G. 2014. Fences and Profanations: Questioning the Sacredness of Urban Design. Journal of Urban Design. 19, 5 (2014), 700–721. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2014.943701.
[15]
Bower, R. 2017. Architecture and space re-imagined: learning from the difference, multiplicity, and otherness of development practice. Routledge.
[16]
Burgess, J. et al. 1988. People, Parks and the Urban Green: A Study of Popular Meanings and Values for Open Spaces in the City. Urban Studies. 25, 6 (Dec. 1988), 455–473. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/00420988820080631.
[17]
Burgess, R. et al. 1997. Contemporary policies for enablement and participation : a critical review. The challenge of sustainable cities: neoliberalism and urban strategies in developing countries. Zed. 138–162.
[18]
Camillo Boano and William Hunter 2010. Collaboration and the conflictual. The nightmare of participation: [crossbench praxis as a mode of criticality]. Sternberg Press. 91–104.
[19]
Carabelli, G. 2018. Grassroots Movements and the Production of (Other) Space(s) - published in The divided city and the grassroots: the (un)making of ethnic divisions in Mostar. Palgrave Macmillan.
[20]
Carabelli, G. 2018. The divided city and the grassroots: the (un)making of ethnic divisions in Mostar. Palgrave Macmillan.
[21]
Catalina Ortiz and Camillo Boano The Medellín’s shifting geopolitics of informality : The Encircled Garden as a dispositive of civil disenfranchisement? 189–207.
[22]
Choguill, M.B.G. 1996. A ladder of community participation for underdeveloped countries. Habitat International. 20, 3 (1996), 431–444. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/0197-3975(96)00020-3.
[23]
Cleaver, F. 2001. Institutions, Agency and the Limitations of Participatory Approaches to Development. Participation: The New Tyranny?. Zed Books. 36–55.
[24]
Cooke, B. and Kothari, U. 2001. The case for participation as tyranny. Participation: the new tyranny?. Zed Books. 1–15.
[25]
Cooke, B. and Kothari, U. 2001. The case for participation as tyranny. Participation: the new tyranny?. Zed Books. 1–15.
[26]
Coole, D. 2007. Experiencing Discourse: Corporeal Communicators and the Embodiment of Power. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations. 9, 3 (2007), 413–433. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-856X.2006.00258.x.
[27]
Cornwall, A. 2006. Historical perspectives on participation in development. Commonwealth & Comparative Politics. 44, 1 (2006), 62–83. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/14662040600624460.
[28]
Cornwall, A. and Coelho, V.S.P. 2007. Spaces for change?: The politics of participation in new democratic arenas. Spaces for change?: the politics of citizen participation in new democratic arenas. Zed. 1–29.
[29]
Cowan, R. 2001. Placecheck: a user’s guide. . Urban Design Alliance .
[30]
D. M. Petrescu and K. Trogal 2017. The social (re)production of Architecture in ‘crisis-riddled’ times. The social (re)production of architecture: politics, values and actions in contemporary practice. D. Petrescu and K. Trogal, eds. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
[31]
Derickson, K.D. 2016. On the politics of recognition in critical urban scholarship. Urban Geography. 37, 6 (Aug. 2016), 824–829. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2015.1105483.
[32]
Doreen Massey 1992. Politics and Space/Time. New Left Review. 196, (1992).
[33]
Doucet, I. 2018. Understanding social engagement in architecture. The Routledge companion to architecture and social engagement. F. Karim, ed. Routledge.
[34]
Dovey, K. 1985. Home and homelessness. Home environments. Plenum Press. 33–64.
[35]
Embrace abolitionist planning to fight Trumpism: https://www.progressivecity.net/single-post/2018/04/06/EMBRACE-ABOLITIONIST-PLANNING-TO-FIGHT-TRUMPISM.
[36]
Erfan, A. 2017. Confronting collective traumas: an exploration of therapeutic planning. Planning Theory & Practice. 18, 1 (Jan. 2017), 34–50. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2016.1249909.
[37]
Eyben, R. et al. 2006. Introduction: Exploring Power for Change. IDS Bulletin. 37, 6 (2006), 1–10. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1759-5436.2006.tb00318.x.
[38]
Fawaz, M. 2009. Hezbollah as Urban Planner? Questions To and From Planning Theory. Planning Theory. 8, 4 (Nov. 2009), 323–334. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095209341327.
[39]
Fenster, T. 2009. Cognitive Temporal Mapping: The Three Steps Method in Urban Planning. Planning Theory & Practice. 10, 4 (Dec. 2009), 479–498. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/14649350903417266.
[40]
Flowerdew, R. and Martin, D. 2005. Methods in human geography: a guide for students doing a research project. Prentice Hall.
[41]
Forester, J. 2006. Making Participation Work When Interests Conflict: Moving from Facilitating Dialogue and Moderating Debate to Mediating Negotiations. Journal of the American Planning Association. 72, 4 (Dec. 2006), 447–456. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360608976765.
[42]
Foucault, M. 1980. The eye of power. Power/knowledge: selected interviews and other writings, 1972-1977. Longman. 146–165.
[43]
Fraser, Nancy Rethinking Recognition. New Left Review. 3, 1103–1124.
[44]
Frediani, A. and Boano, C. 2012. Processes for Just Products: the Capability Space of Participatory Design. The capability approach, technology and design. Springer.
[45]
Frediani, A.A. 2016. Re-imagining Participatory Design: Reflecting on the ASF-UK Change by Design Methodology. Design Issues. 32, 3 (Jul. 2016), 98–111. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1162/DESI_a_00403.
[46]
Frediani, A.A. and Boano, C. 2012. Processes for just products: the capability space of participatory design. The capability approach, technology and design. Springer. 203–222.
[47]
Freire, P. and Bergman Ramos, M. 1996. Pedagogy of the oppressed. Penguin Books.
[48]
Gaventa, J. and Barrett, G. 2010. So What Difference Does it Make? Mapping the Outcomes of Citizen Engagement. IDS Working Papers. 2010, 347 (Oct. 2010), 01–72. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2040-0209.2010.00347_2.x.
[49]
Glass, J. 2008. Facing the Future by Designing in Resilience: An Architectural Perspective. Hazards and the built environment: attaining built-in resilience. Routledge. 172–188.
[50]
Hamdi, N. 2014. Chapter 3. Deciding how to decide. The spacemaker’s guide to big change: design and improvisation in development practice. Routledge.
[51]
Hamdi, N. 2004. Chapter 6. In Search of a Community and Structure of Place. Small change: the art of practice and the limits of planning in cities. Earthscan. 58–72.
[52]
Hamdi, N. 2014. Chapter 7. Participation in practice. The spacemaker’s guide to big change: design and improvisation in development practice. Routledge.
[53]
Hamdi, N. 2010. Chapter 8. PEAS and the Sociable Side of Practice. The placemaker’s guide to building community. Earthscan. 141–152.
[54]
Hamdi, N. 2010. Chapter 9. Reasoning to Scale. The placemaker’s guide to building community. Earthscan. 160–153.
[55]
Hamdi, N. 2004. Chapter 11. Governance and networks: organizing from inside out. Small change: the art of practice and the limits of planning in cities. Earthscan. 107–115.
[56]
Hamdi, N. 2014. Chapter 12. Insiders Out and Outsiders: Practical wisdom and the co-Production of Knowledge. The spacemaker’s guide to big change: design and improvisation in development practice. Routledge.
[57]
Hamdi, N. 2004. Small change: the art of practice and the limits of planning in cities. Earthscan.
[58]
Hamdi, N. and Goethert, R. 1997. Chapter 2. Action Planning In Theory. Action planning for cities: a guide to community practice. John Wiley. 23–59.
[59]
Haraway, D. 1988. Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective. Feminist Studies. 14, 3 (Autumn 1988). DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/3178066.
[60]
Hickey, S. and Mohan, G. 2004. Towards Participation as Transformation: Critical Themes and Challenges. Participation: from tyranny to transformation? : exploring new approaches to participation in development. Zed. 3–24.
[61]
Hirst, P.Q. 2005. Space and power: politics, war and architecture. Polity.
[62]
Hou, J. 2014. Citizen Design: participation and beyond. Companion to Urban Design. Routledge.
[63]
Irazábal, C. 2016. Public, Private, People Partnerships (PPPPs): Reflections from Latin American Cases. Private communities and urban governance: theoretical and comparative perspectives. A. Lehavi, ed. Springer. 191–214.
[64]
Jenkins, P. et al. 2007. Post-1990 issues in planning and housing. Planning and housing in the rapidly urbanising world. Routledge. 178–203.
[65]
Jeremy Till 2009. Imperfect ethics. Architecture depends. MIT Press. 171–187.
[66]
John Forester 1989. Listening: the social policy of everyday life in Planning in the Face of Power. University of California Press, Berkeley. Planning in the face of power. University of California Press.
[67]
Kaminer, T. 2017. Theories of participation, theories of contestation. The efficacy of architecture: political contestation and agency. Routledge.
[68]
Kindon, S.L. et al. 2007. Participatory action research: origins, approaches and methods. Participatory action research approaches and methods: connecting people, participation and place. Routledge. 9–18.
[69]
Komarova, M. and McKnight, M. 2013. ‘We Are Watching You Too’: Reflections on Doing Visual Research in a Contested City. Sociological Research Online. 18, 1 (2013). DOI:https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.2877.
[70]
Kumar, S. 2002. Conceptual specifications. Methods for community participation: a complete guide for practitioners. Practical Action Publishing. 23–52.
[71]
Lahoud, A. 2010. Post-Traumatic Urbanism. Architectural Design. 80, 5 (Sep. 2010), 14–23. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1002/ad.1128.
[72]
Lane, B.M. 2007. What is home? Housing and dwelling: perspectives on modern domestic architecture. Routledge. 50–73.
[73]
Lee, Y. 2008. Design participation tactics: the challenges and new roles for designers in the co-design process. CoDesign. 4, 1 (2008), 31–50. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/15710880701875613.
[74]
Leivas, M. 2018. From the body to the city: participatory action research with social cartography for transformative education and global citizenship. Educational Action Research. (Sep. 2018), 1–16. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2018.1519453.
[75]
Loo, S. 2012. Design-Ing Ethics: the Good, the Bad and the Performative. Design and ethics: reflections on practice. Routledge.
[76]
Luansang, C. et al. 2012. The role of community architects in upgrading; reflecting on the experience in Asia. Environment and Urbanization. 24, 2 (2012), 497–512. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247812456125.
[77]
Luansang, C. et al. 2012. The role of community architects in upgrading; reflecting on the experience in Asia. Environment and Urbanization. 24, 2 (Oct. 2012), 497–512. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247812456125.
[78]
Luck, R. 2007. Learning to talk to users in participatory design situations. Design Studies. 28, 3 (2007), 217–242. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2007.02.002.
[79]
Madanipour, A. 2010. Introduction. Whose public space?: international case studies in urban design and development. Routledge. 1–15.
[80]
Marcuse, P. 2009. From critical urban theory to the right to the city. City. 13, 2–3 (2009), 185–197. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/13604810902982177.
[81]
Markus, T.A. and Cameron, D. 2002. Why language matters. The words between the spaces: buildings and language. Routledge. 1–17.
[82]
Martens, K. 2005. Participatory Experiments from the Bottom up: The role of environmental NGOs and citizen groups. European Journal of Spatial Development. 18, (2005), 1–20.
[83]
Martin, D. et al. 2003. Space, Scale, Governance, and Representation: Contemporary Geographical Perspectives on Urban Politics and Policy. Journal of Urban Affairs. 25, 2 (2003), 113–121. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9906.t01-1-00001.
[84]
Mattila, H. 2002. Aesthetic justice and urban planning: Who ought to have the right to design cities? GeoJournal. 58, 2/3 (2002), 131–138. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1023/B:GEJO.0000010832.88129.cc.
[85]
McFarlane, C. 2006. Knowledge, learning and development: a post-rationalist approach. Progress in Development Studies. 6, 4 (2006), 287–305. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1191/1464993406ps144oa.
[86]
Miessen, M. 2010. Collaboration and the conflictual, Published in The nightmare of participation - p. 91-104. Sternberg Press.
[87]
Miraftab, F. 2005. Insurgency and Spaces of Active Citizenship: The Story of Western Cape Anti-eviction Campaign in South Africa. Journal of Planning Education and Research. 25, 2 (2005), 200–217. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X05282182.
[88]
Miraftab, F. 2004. Making neo-liberal governance: the disempowering work of empowerment. International Planning Studies. 9, 4 (2004), 239–259. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/13563470500050130.
[89]
Mitlin, D. 2008. With and beyond the state -- co-production as a route to political influence, power and transformation for grassroots organizations. Environment and Urbanization. 20, 2 (Oct. 2008), 339–360. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247808096117.
[90]
Mitlin, D. and Bartlett, S. 2018. Editorial: Co-production – key ideas. Environment and Urbanization. 30, 2 (Oct. 2018), 355–366. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247818791931.
[91]
Mitlin, D. and Satterthwaite, D. 2004. Empowering squatter citizen: local government, civil society and urban poverty reduction. Earthscan.
[92]
Mitlin, D. and Thompson, J. 1995. Participatory approaches in urban areas: strengthening civil society or reinforcing the status quo? Environment and Urbanization. 7, 1 (1995), 231–250. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/095624789500700113.
[93]
Moser, C.O.N. 1989. Community participation in urban projects in the Third World. Progress in Planning. 32, (Jan. 1989), 71–133. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-9006(89)90010-X.
[94]
Mouffe, C. 2013. Agonistics: thinking the world politically. Verso.
[95]
Mukhija, V. 2014. Urban Design for a Planet of Informal Cities. Companion to Urban Design. Routledge.
[96]
Municipalism and the Feminization of Politics: https://roarmag.org/magazine/municipalism-feminization-urban-politics/.
[97]
Patel, S. and Mitlin, D. 2004. Grassroots-driven development: The alliance of SPARC, the National Slum Dwellers Federation and Mahila Milan. Empowering squatter citizen: local government, civil society and urban poverty reduction. Earthscan. 216–241.
[98]
Petrescu, D. et al. 2016. Co-producing commons-based resilience: lessons from R-Urban. Building Research & Information. 44, 7 (Oct. 2016), 717–736. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2016.1214891.
[99]
Petrescu, D. and Chiles, P. 2009. Agency: alternative practices and alternative worlds. Architectural Research Quarterly. 13, 02 (Jun. 2009). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S1359135509990194.
[100]
Petrescu, D. and Petcou, C. 2013. Tactics for a Transgressive Practice. Architectural Design. 83, 6 (Nov. 2013), 58–65. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1002/ad.1675.
[101]
Radical municipalism: demanding the future: 2017. https://www.opendemocracy.net/plan-c/radical-municipalism-demanding-future.
[102]
Ramirez, R. 2010. Integrated Informality in the Barrios of Havana. Rethinking the informal city: critical perspectives from Latin America. Berghahn Books. 137–162.
[103]
Read, C. et al. 2014. Applying a Practical, Participatory Action Research Framework for Producing Knowledge, Action and Change in Communities: A Health Case Study from Gujarat, Western India. M2 Models and Methodologies for Community Engagement. R. Tiwari et al., eds. Springer Singapore. 91–105.
[104]
Rendell, J. 2018. Only resist: Five particular qualities might characterise a specifically feminist approach to critical spatial practice, suggests Jane Rendell. Architectural Review. 243, 1449 (2018), 8–18.
[105]
Rios, M. 2008. Envisioning Citizenship: Toward a Polity Approach in Urban Design. Journal of Urban Design. 13, 2 (2008), 213–229. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/13574800801965692.
[106]
Robinson, J. 1994. White women researching/representing ‘others’: from antiapartheid to postcolonialism? Writing women and space: colonial and postcolonial geographies. Guilford Press. 197–228.
[107]
Rolnik, R. 2014. Place, inhabitance and citizenship: the right to housing and the right to the city in the contemporary urban world. International Journal of Housing Policy. 14, 3 (Jul. 2014), 293–300. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/14616718.2014.936178.
[108]
Rose, G. 1997. Situating knowledges: positionality, reflexivities and other tactics. Progress in Human Geography. 21, 3 (1997), 305–320. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1191/030913297673302122.
[109]
Roy, A. 2009. Civic Governmentality: The Politics of Inclusion in Beirut and Mumbai. Antipode. 41, 1 (2009), 159–179. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8330.2008.00660.x.
[110]
Roy, A. 2016. Who’s Afraid of Postcolonial Theory? International Journal of Urban and Regional Research. 40, 1 (Jan. 2016), 200–209. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12274.
[111]
Saba Golchehr Data-driven design for civic participation : Introducing digital methods for on-going civic engagement for design in public space. 56–70. DOI:https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315110332-5.
[112]
Sandercock, L. 1998. Re/presenting Planning’s Histories. Towards cosmopolis: planning for multicultural cities. John Wiley & Sons. 33–54.
[113]
Sandercock, L. and Attili, G. 2010. Digital Ethnography as Planning Praxis: An Experiment with Film as Social Research, Community Engagement and Policy Dialogue. Planning Theory & Practice. 11, 1 (Mar. 2010), 23–45. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/14649350903538012.
[114]
Sanoff, H. 2014. Multiple views of participatory design. International Journal of Architectural Research: ArchNet-IJAR. 2, 1 (2014), 57–69.
[115]
SARA KINDON Participatory Action Research: Origins, approaches and methods. 35–44. DOI:https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203933671-13.
[116]
Sarkissian, W. and Bunjamin-Mau, W. et al. 2009. Designing and managing a workshop. SpeakOut: the step-by-step guide to SpeakOuts and community workshops. Earthscan.
[117]
Schindler, S. 2017. Towards a paradigm of Southern urbanism. City. 21, 1 (Jan. 2017), 47–64. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/13604813.2016.1263494.
[118]
Schuermans, N. and Newton, C. 2012. Being a young and foreign researcher in South Africa: Towards a postcolonial dialogue. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography. 33, 3 (2012), 295–300. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/sjtg.12005_4.
[119]
Seymour, W. 2007. Exhuming the Body: Revisiting the Role of the Visible Body in Ethnographic Research. Qualitative Health Research. 17, 9 (2007), 1188–1197. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732307308517.
[120]
Siemiatycki, M. 2012. The Role of the Planning Scholar. Journal of Planning Education and Research. 32, 2 (Jun. 2012), 147–159. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X12440729.
[121]
de Souza, M.L. 2006. Together with the state, despite the state, against the state. Social Movements as ‘Critical Urban Planning’ Agents. City. 10, 3 (Dec. 2006), 327–342. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/13604810600982347.
[122]
Sun, X. and Huang, R. 2018. Spatial meaning-making and urban activism: Two tales of anti-PX protests in urban China. Journal of Urban Affairs. (Mar. 2018), 1–21. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2018.1443010.
[123]
Sundberg, J. 2005. Looking for the critical geographer, or why bodies and geographies matter to the emergence of critical geographies of Latin America. Geoforum. 36, 1 (2005), 17–28. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2004.03.006.
[124]
Swyngedouw, E. and Wilson, J. 2015. Insurgent architects and the spectral return of the urban political. Planning against the political: democratic deficits in European territorial governance. J. Metzger et al., eds. Routledge. 215–225.
[125]
Till, J. 1998. Architecture of the Impure Community. Occupying architecture: between the architect and the user. J. Hill, ed. Routledge. 34–42.
[126]
Till, J. 2009. Imperfect ethics. Architecture depends. MIT Press. 171–187.
[127]
Turner, J.F.C. 1982. Issues in Self-Help and Self-Managed Housing. Self-help housing: a critique. Mansell. 99–113.
[128]
Umemoto, K. 2001. Walking in Another’s Shoes. Journal of Planning Education and Research. 21, 1 (Sep. 2001), 17–31. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X0102100102.
[129]
Wahby, N. 2017. Institutions and Populism in the Global South-Lessons for the Brexit-Trump Era. City & Community. 16, 2 (Jun. 2017), 139–144. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/cico.12234.
[130]
Wates, N. 2000. General principles A-Z. Community planning handbook : how people can shape their cities, towns and villages in any part of the world. Earthscan Publications Ltd. 11–21.
[131]
Watson, V. 2006. Deep Difference: Diversity, Planning and Ethics. Planning Theory. 5, 1 (Mar. 2006), 31–50. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095206061020.
[132]
Watson, V. 2009. Seeing from the South: Refocusing Urban Planning on the Globe’s Central Urban Issues. Urban Studies. 46, 11 (Oct. 2009), 2259–2275. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098009342598.
[133]
Winkler, T. 2017. Black texts on white paper: Learning to resistant texts as an approach towards decolonising planning. Planning Theory. (Nov. 2017). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095217739335.
[134]
Yacobi, H. 2004. Social Exclusion, Housing Environment and Tolerant Planning: The Case of the Jahelin Bedouin Tribe. Hagar - International Social Science Review. 69-84. Hagar international social science review = Hājir. 5, 1 (2004), 69–83.
[135]
Yacobi, H. 2007. The NGOization of Space: Dilemmas of Social Change, Planning Policy, and the Israeli Public Sphere. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space. 25, 4 (Aug. 2007), 745–758. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1068/d459t.
[136]
Yacobi, H. et al. 2016. Walls, enclaves and the (counter) politics of design. Journal of Urban Design. 21, 4 (Jul. 2016), 481–494. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2016.1184566.
[137]
Zetter, R. 2002. Market enablement or sustainable development : the conflicting paradigms of urbanization. Planning in cities: sustainability and growth in the developing world. ITDG. 31–42.
[138]
Environment and Urbanization.
[139]
Environment and Urbanization.
[140]
McDowell, L (1992a), Doing gender: Feminism, feminists and research methods in human geography. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series 17 399–416.
[141]
Progress in Human Geography.
[142]
View of Toward an Architecture of Dissensus: Participatory Urbanism in South-East Asia - Boano, C. and Kelling, E. (2013).
[143]
We Drew What We Imagined: Participatory Mapping Performance, and Arts of Landscape Making, • Sletto, B. I., (2009).
