1
A. Cuthbert. Chapter  6:  Urban Design and Spatial Political Economy. In: Companion to Urban Design. Routledge 2014. doi:10.4324/9780203844434
2
Martin D, McCann E, Purcell M. Space, Scale, Governance, and Representation: Contemporary Geographical Perspectives on Urban Politics and Policy. Journal of Urban Affairs 2003;25:113–21. doi:10.1111/1467-9906.t01-1-00001
3
Sanoff H. Multiple views of participatory design. International Journal of Architectural Research: ArchNet-IJAR 2014;2:57–69.http://www.archnet-ijar.net/index.php/IJAR/article/view/177
4
Watson V. Seeing from the South: Refocusing Urban Planning on the Globe’s Central Urban Issues. Urban Studies 2009;46:2259–75. doi:10.1177/0042098009342598
5
Schindler S. Towards a paradigm of Southern urbanism. City 2017;21:47–64. doi:10.1080/13604813.2016.1263494
6
Barry J, Horst M, Inch A, et al. Unsettling planning theory. Planning Theory 2018;17:418–38. doi:10.1177/1473095218763842
7
Doreen Massey. Politics and Space/Time. New Left Review 1992;196.https://newleftreview.org/I/196/doreen-massey-politics-and-space-time
8
Rios M. Envisioning Citizenship: Toward a Polity Approach in Urban Design. Journal of Urban Design 2008;13:213–29. doi:10.1080/13574800801965692
9
Roy A. Who’s Afraid of Postcolonial Theory? International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 2016;40:200–9. doi:10.1111/1468-2427.12274
10
McFarlane C. Knowledge, learning and development: a post-rationalist approach. Progress in Development Studies 2006;6:287–305. doi:10.1191/1464993406ps144oa
11
Cornwall A. Historical perspectives on participation in development. Commonwealth & Comparative Politics 2006;44:62–83. doi:10.1080/14662040600624460
12
A. Escobar. The making and the unmaking of the third world through development. In: The post-development reader. London: : Zed Books 1996. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=92a6b119-10d2-e811-80cd-005056af4099
13
Hickey S, Mohan G. Towards Participation as Transformation: Critical Themes and Challenges. In: Participation: from tyranny to transformation? : exploring new approaches to participation in development. London: : Zed 2004. 3–24.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=1893885c-8336-e711-80c9-005056af4099
14
Mitlin D. With and beyond the state -- co-production as a route to political influence, power and transformation for grassroots organizations. Environment and Urbanization 2008;20:339–60. doi:10.1177/0956247808096117
15
Rendell J. Only resist: Five particular qualities might characterise a specifically feminist approach to critical spatial practice, suggests Jane Rendell. Architectural Review 2018;243:8–18.http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=asu&AN=128870014&site=ehost-live&scope=site
16
Miraftab F. Making neo-liberal governance: the disempowering work of empowerment. International Planning Studies 2004;9:239–59. doi:10.1080/13563470500050130
17
Derickson KD. On the politics of recognition in critical urban scholarship. Urban Geography 2016;37:824–9. doi:10.1080/02723638.2015.1105483
18
Irazábal C. Public, Private, People Partnerships (PPPPs): Reflections from Latin American Cases. In: Lehavi A, ed. Private communities and urban governance: theoretical and comparative perspectives. Switzerland: : Springer 2016. 191–214.http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=nlebk&AN=1224661&site=ehost-live&scope=site
19
Gaventa J, Barrett G. So What Difference Does it Make? Mapping the Outcomes of Citizen Engagement. IDS Working Papers 2010;2010:01–72. doi:10.1111/j.2040-0209.2010.00347_2.x
20
Roy A. Civic Governmentality: The Politics of Inclusion in Beirut and Mumbai. Antipode 2009;41:159–79. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8330.2008.00660.x
21
Catalina Ortiz and Camillo Boano. The Medellín’s shifting geopolitics of informality : The Encircled Garden as a dispositive of civil disenfranchisement? 189–207. doi:10.4324/9781315659275-16
22
Marcuse P. From critical urban theory to the right to the city. City 2009;13:185–97. doi:10.1080/13604810902982177
23
Sun X, Huang R. Spatial meaning-making and urban activism: Two tales of anti-PX protests in urban China. Journal of Urban Affairs 2018;:1–21. doi:10.1080/07352166.2018.1443010
24
Rolnik R. Place, inhabitance and citizenship: the right to housing and the right to the city in the contemporary urban world. International Journal of Housing Policy 2014;14:293–300. doi:10.1080/14616718.2014.936178
25
Bell B, Wakeford K. Expanding architecture: design as activism. New York: : Metropolis Books 2008.
26
Miraftab F. Insurgency and Spaces of Active Citizenship: The Story of Western Cape Anti-eviction Campaign in South Africa. Journal of Planning Education and Research 2005;25:200–17. doi:10.1177/0739456X05282182
27
Winkler T. Black texts on white paper: Learning to                              resistant texts as an approach towards decolonising planning. Planning Theory Published Online First: 4 November 2017. doi:10.1177/1473095217739335
28
Al-Harithy H. The participative discourse: community activism in post-war reconstruction. In: Saliba R, ed. Urban design in the Arab world: reconceptualizing boundaries. Farnham, Surrey, England: : Ashgate 2015. 39–50.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=3d19f9c2-7c36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
29
Carabelli G. Grassroots Movements and the Production of (Other) Space(s) - published in The divided city and the grassroots: the (un)making of ethnic divisions in Mostar. Basingstoke, Hampshire: : Palgrave Macmillan 2018. http://ucl.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=3192314340004761&institutionId=4761&customerId=4760
30
Erfan A. Confronting collective traumas: an exploration of therapeutic planning. Planning Theory & Practice 2017;18:34–50. doi:10.1080/14649357.2016.1249909
31
Fawaz M. Hezbollah as Urban Planner? Questions To and From Planning Theory. Planning Theory 2009;8:323–34. doi:10.1177/1473095209341327
32
Lahoud A. Post-Traumatic Urbanism. Architectural Design 2010;80:14–23. doi:10.1002/ad.1128
33
Thomas Abbot, Roxana Aslan, Riley O’Brien and Nathan Serafin. Embrace abolitionist planning to fight Trumpism. https://www.progressivecity.net/single-post/2018/04/06/EMBRACE-ABOLITIONIST-PLANNING-TO-FIGHT-TRUMPISM
34
Petrescu D, Petcou C, Baibarac C. Co-producing commons-based resilience: lessons from R-Urban. Building Research & Information 2016;44:717–36. doi:10.1080/09613218.2016.1214891
35
Carabelli G. The divided city and the grassroots: the (un)making of ethnic divisions in Mostar. Basingstoke, Hampshire: : Palgrave Macmillan 2018. http://ucl.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=3192314340004761&institutionId=4761&customerId=4760
36
de Souza ML. Together with the state, despite the state, against the state. Social Movements as ‘Critical Urban Planning’ Agents. City 2006;10:327–42. doi:10.1080/13604810600982347
37
Awan N, Schneider T, Till J. Chapter 3: The operations of spatial agency. In: Spatial agency: other ways of doing architecture. London: : Routledge 2011. 69–82.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=491ebea7-5536-e711-80c9-005056af4099
38
Mukhija V. Urban Design for a Planet of Informal Cities. In: Companion to Urban Design. Routledge 2014. doi:10.4324/9780203844434.ch43
39
Mattila H. Aesthetic justice and urban planning: Who ought to have the right to design cities? GeoJournal 2002;58:131–8. doi:10.1023/B:GEJO.0000010832.88129.cc
40
Frediani AA. Re-imagining Participatory Design: Reflecting on the ASF-UK Change by Design Methodology. Design Issues 2016;32:98–111. doi:10.1162/DESI_a_00403
41
Appadurai A. Deep democracy: urban governmentality and the horizon of politics. Environment and Urbanization 2001;13:23–43. doi:10.1177/095624780101300203
42
Blundell Jones P, Petrescu D, Till J, editors. Architecture and participation. London: : Routledge 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203022863
43
AbdouMaliq Simone , and  Edgar Pieterse. New Urban Worlds : Inhabiting Dissonant Times. Polity Press 2017. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/UCL/reader.action?docID=4983712&ppg=173
44
Laura Roth, Kate Shea Baird. Municipalism and the Feminization of Politics. https://roarmag.org/magazine/municipalism-feminization-urban-politics/
45
Loo S. Design-Ing Ethics: the Good, the Bad and the Performative. In: Design and ethics: reflections on practice. London: : Routledge 2012. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=f6e15cf3-5536-e711-80c9-005056af4099
46
Hou J. Citizen Design: participation and beyond. In: Companion to Urban Design. Routledge 2014. doi:10.4324/9780203844434.ch25
47
Luansang C, Boonmahathanakorn S, Domingo-Price ML. The role of community architects in upgrading; reflecting on the experience in Asia. Environment and Urbanization 2012;24:497–512. doi:10.1177/0956247812456125
48
Wahby N. Institutions and Populism in the Global South-Lessons for the Brexit-Trump Era. City & Community 2017;16:139–44. doi:10.1111/cico.12234
49
Umemoto K. Walking in Another’s Shoes. Journal of Planning Education and Research 2001;21:17–31. doi:10.1177/0739456X0102100102
50
Lee Y. Design participation tactics: the challenges and new roles for designers in the co-design process. CoDesign 2008;4:31–50. doi:10.1080/15710880701875613
51
Choguill MBG. A ladder of community participation for underdeveloped countries. Habitat International 1996;20:431–44. doi:10.1016/0197-3975(96)00020-3
52
Frediani A, Boano C. Processes for Just Products: the Capability Space of Participatory Design. In: The capability approach, technology and design. London: : Springer 2012. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007%2F978-94-007-3879-9
53
Boano C, Talocci G. Fences and Profanations: Questioning the Sacredness of Urban Design. Journal of Urban Design 2014;19:700–21. doi:10.1080/13574809.2014.943701
54
Hirst PQ. Space and power: politics, war and architecture. Cambridge: : Polity 2005.
55
View of Toward an Architecture of Dissensus: Participatory Urbanism in South-East Asia - Boano, C. and Kelling, E. (2013). https://journals.open.tudelft.nl/index.php/footprint/article/view/Boano/945
56
Doucet I. Understanding social engagement in architecture. In: Karim F, ed. The Routledge companion to architecture and social engagement. New York, NY: : Routledge 2018. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=3a3e354f-f5fd-e811-80cd-005056af4099
57
Luansang C, Boonmahathanakorn S, Domingo-Price ML. The role of community architects in upgrading; reflecting on the experience in Asia. Environment and Urbanization 2012;24:497–512. doi:10.1177/0956247812456125
58
Till J. Architecture of the Impure Community. In: Hill J, ed. Occupying architecture: between the architect and the user. London: : Routledge 1998. 34–42.http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203983829
59
Cleaver F. Institutions, Agency and the Limitations of Participatory Approaches to Development. In: Participation: The New Tyranny? London: : Zed Books 2001. 36–55.
60
Forester J. Making Participation Work When Interests Conflict: Moving from Facilitating Dialogue and Moderating Debate to Mediating Negotiations. Journal of the American Planning Association 2006;72:447–56. doi:10.1080/01944360608976765
61
Russell B. Radical municipalism: demanding the future. 2017.https://www.opendemocracy.net/plan-c/radical-municipalism-demanding-future
62
Siemiatycki M. The Role of the Planning Scholar. Journal of Planning Education and Research 2012;32:147–59. doi:10.1177/0739456X12440729
63
Fraser, Nancy. Rethinking Recognition. New Left Review;3:1103–24.https://newleftreview.org/II/3/nancy-fraser-rethinking-recognition
64
Martens K. Participatory Experiments from the Bottom up: The role of environmental NGOs and citizen groups. European Journal of Spatial Development 2005;18:1–20.https://archive.nordregio.se/European-Journal-of-Spatial-Development/Archive/2005/index.html
65
Watson V. Deep Difference: Diversity, Planning and Ethics. Planning Theory 2006;5:31–50. doi:10.1177/1473095206061020
66
Yacobi H. The NGOization of Space: Dilemmas of Social Change, Planning Policy, and the Israeli Public Sphere. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 2007;25:745–58. doi:10.1068/d459t
67
Yacobi H, Ventura J, Danzig S. Walls, enclaves and the (counter) politics of design. Journal of Urban Design 2016;21:481–94. doi:10.1080/13574809.2016.1184566
68
John Forester. Listening: the social policy of everyday life in Planning in the Face of Power. University of California Press, Berkeley. In: Planning in the face of power. Berkeley: : University of California Press 1989. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=a080e248-73f4-e711-80cd-005056af4099
69
Markus TA, Cameron D. Why language matters. In: The words between the spaces: buildings and language. London: : Routledge 2002. 1–17.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=9f5a20ed-8b33-e911-80cd-005056af4099
70
Fenster T. Cognitive Temporal Mapping: The Three Steps Method in Urban Planning. Planning Theory & Practice 2009;10:479–98. doi:10.1080/14649350903417266
71
Akhil  Gupta and Ferguson, D. Discipline and Practice:"The Field” As Site, Method, and Location In Anthropology. …  locations: Boundaries and grounds of a  …http://www.academia.edu/252003/Discipline_and_Practice_The_Field_As_Site_Method_and_Location_In_Anthropology
72
McDowell, L (1992a), Doing gender: Feminism, feminists and research methods in human geography. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series 17 399–416. http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/pdf/Doing_Gender.pdf
73
Read C, Earnest J, Ali M, et al. Applying a Practical, Participatory Action Research Framework for Producing Knowledge, Action and Change in Communities: A Health Case Study from Gujarat, Western India. In: Tiwari R, Lommerse M, Smith D, eds. M2 Models and Methodologies for Community Engagement. Singapore: : Springer Singapore 2014. 91–105. doi:10.1007/978-981-4585-11-8_6
74
Leivas M. From the body to the city: participatory action research with social cartography for transformative education and global citizenship. Educational Action Research 2018;:1–16. doi:10.1080/09650792.2018.1519453
75
Amir S. Rethinking Design Policy in the Third World. Design Issues 2004;20:68–75. doi:10.1162/0747936042311995
76
Komarova M, McKnight M. ‘We Are Watching You Too’: Reflections on Doing Visual Research in a Contested City. Sociological Research Online 2013;18. doi:10.5153/sro.2877
77
Rose G. Situating knowledges: positionality, reflexivities and other tactics. Progress in Human Geography 1997;21:305–20. doi:10.1191/030913297673302122
78
Flowerdew R, Martin D. Methods in human geography: a guide for students doing a research project. 2nd ed. Harlow: : Prentice Hall 2005. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=UCL&isbn=9781405898416
79
Hamdi N. Chapter 12. Insiders Out and Outsiders: Practical wisdom and the co-Production of Knowledge. In: The spacemaker’s guide to big change: design and improvisation in development practice. New York, NY: : Routledge 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315773315
80
Mitlin D, Bartlett S. Editorial: Co-production – key ideas. Environment and Urbanization 2018;30:355–66. doi:10.1177/0956247818791931
81
Sarkissian, W. and Bunjamin-Mau, W. et al. Designing and managing a workshop. In: SpeakOut: the step-by-step guide to SpeakOuts and community workshops. London: : Earthscan 2009. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=55416db3-8436-e711-80c9-005056af4099
82
Saba Golchehr. Data-driven design for civic participation : Introducing digital methods for on-going civic engagement for design in public space. ;:56–70. doi:10.4324/9781315110332-5
83
Burgess J, Harrison CM, Limb M. People, Parks and the Urban Green: A Study of Popular Meanings and Values for Open Spaces in the City. Urban Studies 1988;25:455–73. doi:10.1080/00420988820080631
84
We Drew What We Imagined: Participatory Mapping Performance, and Arts of Landscape Making, • Sletto, B. I., (2009). http://www.iapad.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/Sletto_CA_August_20091.pdf
85
Freire P, Bergman Ramos M. Pedagogy of the oppressed. New revised edition. London: : Penguin Books 1996.
86
Haraway D. Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective. Feminist Studies 1988;14. doi:10.2307/3178066
87
SARA KINDON. Participatory Action Research: Origins, approaches and methods. ;:35–44. doi:10.4324/9780203933671-13
88
Jeremy Till. Imperfect ethics. In: Architecture depends. Cambridge, Mass: : MIT Press 2009. 171–87.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=730082ec-4e36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
89
Miessen M. Collaboration and the conflictual, Published in The nightmare of participation - p. 91-104. Berlin: : Sternberg Press 2010.
90
Cooke B, Kothari U. The case for participation as tyranny. In: Participation: the new tyranny? London: : Zed Books 2001. 1–15.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=c4bd2ae2-8a36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
91
Mouffe C. Agonistics: thinking the world politically. London: : Verso 2013.
92
Kaminer T. Theories of participation, theories of contestation. In: The efficacy of architecture: political contestation and agency. Abingdon, Oxon: : Routledge 2017.
93
Moser CON. Community participation in urban projects in the Third World. Progress in Planning 1989;32:71–133. doi:10.1016/0305-9006(89)90010-X
94
Sandercock L. Re/presenting Planning’s Histories. In: Towards cosmopolis: planning for multicultural cities. Chichester: : John Wiley & Sons 1998. 33–54.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=a57f9aa3-151e-ed11-bd6e-a04a5e5d2f8d
95
Yacobi H. Social Exclusion, Housing Environment and Tolerant Planning: The Case of the Jahelin Bedouin Tribe. Hagar - International Social Science Review. 69-84. Hagar international social science review = Hājir 2004;5:69–83.
96
Abu-Orf H. Is planning possible in cities divided by violent conflict? International Development Planning Review 2011;33:321–42. doi:10.3828/idpr.2011.16
97
Bower R. Architecture and space re-imagined: learning from the difference, multiplicity, and otherness of development practice. New York: : Routledge 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315678146
98
Hamdi N, Goethert R. Chapter 2. Action Planning In Theory. In: Action planning for cities: a guide to community practice. Chichester: : John Wiley 1997. 23–59.
99
Hamdi N. Chapter 3. Deciding how to decide. In: The spacemaker’s guide to big change: design and improvisation in development practice. New York, NY: : Routledge 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315773315
100
Hamdi N. Chapter 6. In Search of a Community and Structure of Place. In: Small change: the art of practice and the limits of planning in cities. London: : Earthscan 2004. 58–72.
101
Luck R. Learning to talk to users in participatory design situations. Design Studies 2007;28:217–42. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2007.02.002
102
Environment and Urbanization. http://journals.sagepub.com/loi/eau
103
Camillo Boano and William Hunter. Collaboration and the conflictual. In: The nightmare of participation: [crossbench praxis as a mode of criticality]. Berlin: : Sternberg Press 2010. 91–104.
104
Hamdi N. Chapter 7. Participation in practice. In: The spacemaker’s guide to big change: design and improvisation in development practice. New York, NY: : Routledge 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315773315
105
Petrescu D, Chiles P. Agency: alternative practices and alternative worlds. Architectural Research Quarterly 2009;13. doi:10.1017/S1359135509990194
106
Hamdi N. Chapter 8. PEAS and the Sociable Side of Practice. In: The placemaker’s guide to building community. London: : Earthscan 2010. 141–52.
107
Sandercock L, Attili G. Digital Ethnography as Planning Praxis: An Experiment with Film as Social Research, Community Engagement and Policy Dialogue. Planning Theory & Practice 2010;11:23–45. doi:10.1080/14649350903538012
108
Hamdi N. Chapter 9. Reasoning to Scale. In: The placemaker’s guide to building community. London: : Earthscan 2010. 160–153.
109
Hamdi N. Chapter 11. Governance and networks: organizing from inside out. In: Small change: the art of practice and the limits of planning in cities. London: : Earthscan 2004. 107–15.
110
Environment and Urbanization. http://journals.sagepub.com/loi/eau
111
Mitlin D, Thompson J. Participatory approaches in urban areas: strengthening civil society or        reinforcing the status quo? Environment and Urbanization 1995;7:231–50. doi:10.1177/095624789500700113
112
Petrescu D, Petcou C. Tactics for a Transgressive Practice. Architectural Design 2013;83:58–65. doi:10.1002/ad.1675
113
Mitlin D, Satterthwaite D. Empowering squatter citizen: local government, civil society and urban poverty reduction. London: : Earthscan 2004.
114
Cowan R. Placecheck: a user’s guide. . 2001.
115
Robinson J. White women researching/representing ‘others’: from antiapartheid to postcolonialism? In: Writing women and space: colonial and postcolonial geographies. New York: : Guilford Press 1994. 197–228.
116
Foucault M. The eye of power. In: Power/knowledge: selected interviews and other writings, 1972-1977. Harlow: : Longman 1980. 146–65.
117
Burgess R, Carmona M, Kolstee T. Contemporary policies for enablement and participation : a critical review. In: The challenge of sustainable cities: neoliberalism and urban strategies in developing countries. London: : Zed 1997. 138–62.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=9c4bae9a-8a36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
118
D. M. Petrescu, K. Trogal. The social (re)production of Architecture in ‘crisis-riddled’ times. In: Petrescu D, Trogal K, eds. The social (re)production of architecture: politics, values and actions in contemporary practice. London: : Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group 2017. doi:10.4324/9781315717180
119
Jenkins P, Smith H, Wang YP. Post-1990 issues in planning and housing. In: Planning and housing in the rapidly urbanising world. London: : Routledge 2007. 178–203.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=ee5bfbd5-9536-e711-80c9-005056af4099
120
Cooke B, Kothari U. The case for participation as tyranny. In: Participation: the new tyranny? London: : Zed Books 2001. 1–15.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=c4bd2ae2-8a36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
121
Blunt A, Dowling RM. Setting up home: an introduction. In: Home. London: : Routledge 2006. 1–31.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=2394bfc2-9536-e711-80c9-005056af4099
122
Lane BM. What is home? In: Housing and dwelling: perspectives on modern domestic architecture. Abingdon: : Routledge 2007. 50–73.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=f87a55cc-9536-e711-80c9-005056af4099
123
Coole D. Experiencing Discourse: Corporeal Communicators and the Embodiment of Power. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 2007;9:413–33. doi:10.1111/j.1467-856X.2006.00258.x
124
Kumar S. Conceptual specifications. In: Methods for community participation: a complete guide for practitioners. Rugby: : Practical Action Publishing 2002. 23–52.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=ca0786a4-8836-e711-80c9-005056af4099
125
Hamdi N. Small change: the art of practice and the limits of planning in cities. London: : Earthscan 2004.
126
Sundberg J. Looking for the critical geographer, or why bodies and geographies matter to the emergence of critical geographies of Latin America. Geoforum 2005;36:17–28. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2004.03.006
127
Swyngedouw E, Wilson J. Insurgent architects and the spectral return of the urban political. In: Metzger J, Allmendinger P, Oosterlynck S, eds. Planning against the political: democratic deficits in European territorial governance. New York: : Routledge 2015. 215–25.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=20930d20-33c9-e711-80cd-005056af4099
128
Kindon SL, Pain R, Kesby M. Participatory action research: origins, approaches and methods. In: Participatory action research approaches and methods: connecting people, participation and place. Abingdon: : Routledge 2007. 9–18.https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/e/9781134135561
129
Patel S, Mitlin D. Grassroots-driven development: The alliance of SPARC, the National Slum Dwellers Federation and Mahila Milan. In: Empowering squatter citizen: local government, civil society and urban poverty reduction. London: : Earthscan 2004. 216–41.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=5b1d1c38-8436-e711-80c9-005056af4099
130
Wates N. General principles A-Z. In: Community planning handbook : how people can shape their cities, towns and villages in any part of the world. London: : Earthscan Publications Ltd 2000. 11–21.
131
Frediani AA, Boano C. Processes for just products: the capability space of participatory design. In: The capability approach, technology and design. Dordrecht: : Springer 2012. 203–22.https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007%2F978-94-007-3879-9
132
Zetter R. Market enablement or sustainable development : the conflicting paradigms of urbanization. In: Planning in cities: sustainability and growth in the developing world. London: : ITDG 2002. 31–42.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=bea9ee93-8836-e711-80c9-005056af4099
133
Cornwall A, Coelho VSP. Spaces for change?: The politics of participation in new democratic arenas. In: Spaces for change?: the politics of citizen participation in new democratic arenas. London: : Zed 2007. 1–29.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=722bea86-8336-e711-80c9-005056af4099
134
Glass J. Facing the Future by Designing in Resilience: An Architectural Perspective. In: Hazards and the built environment: attaining built-in resilience. Abingdon: : Routledge 2008. 172–88.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=ad954536-5536-e711-80c9-005056af4099
135
Seymour W. Exhuming the Body: Revisiting the Role of the Visible Body in Ethnographic Research. Qualitative Health Research 2007;17:1188–97. doi:10.1177/1049732307308517
136
Ramirez R. Integrated Informality in the Barrios of Havana. In: Rethinking the informal city: critical perspectives from Latin America. New York: : Berghahn Books 2010. 137–62.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=222f22f0-8536-e711-80c9-005056af4099
137
Turner JFC. Issues in Self-Help and Self-Managed Housing. In: Self-help housing: a critique. London: : Mansell 1982. 99–113.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=c2ed8bb4-6536-e711-80c9-005056af4099
138
Madanipour A. Introduction. In: Whose public space?: international case studies in urban design and development. London: : Routledge 2010. 1–15.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=e4a879a0-5536-e711-80c9-005056af4099
139
Dovey K. Home and homelessness. In: Home environments. New York: : Plenum Press 1985. 33–64.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=8e4fc2f6-4f36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
140
Eyben R, Harris C, Pettit J. Introduction: Exploring Power for Change. IDS Bulletin 2006;37:1–10. doi:10.1111/j.1759-5436.2006.tb00318.x
141
Till J. Imperfect ethics. In: Architecture depends. Cambridge, Mass: : MIT Press 2009. 171–87.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=730082ec-4e36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
142
Schuermans N, Newton C. Being a young and foreign researcher in South Africa: Towards a postcolonial dialogue. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography 2012;33:295–300. doi:10.1111/sjtg.12005_4
143
Progress in Human Geography. https://search.proquest.com/publication/37137