A. Cuthbert. ‘Chapter  6:  Urban Design and Spatial Political Economy’. Companion to Urban Design. Routledge, 2014. Web. <http://www.routledgehandbooks.com/doi/10.4324/9780203844434>.
A. Escobar. ‘The Making and the Unmaking of the Third World through Development’. The Post-Development Reader. London: Zed Books, 1996. Web. <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=92a6b119-10d2-e811-80cd-005056af4099>.
AbdouMaliq Simone , and  Edgar Pieterse. New Urban Worlds : Inhabiting Dissonant Times. Polity Press, 2017. Web. <https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/UCL/reader.action?docID=4983712&amp;ppg=173>.
Abu-Orf, Hazem. ‘Is Planning Possible in Cities Divided by Violent Conflict?’ International Development Planning Review 33.3 (2011): 321–342. Web.
Akhil  Gupta and Ferguson, D. ‘Discipline and Practice:"The Field” As Site, Method, and Location In Anthropology’. …  locations: Boundaries and grounds of a  … n. pag. Web. <http://www.academia.edu/252003/Discipline_and_Practice_The_Field_As_Site_Method_and_Location_In_Anthropology>.
Al-Harithy, Howayda. ‘The Participative Discourse: Community Activism in Post-War Reconstruction.’ Urban Design in the Arab World: Reconceptualizing Boundaries. Ed. Robert Saliba. Design and the built environment series. Farnham, Surrey, England: Ashgate, 2015. 39–50. Web. <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=3d19f9c2-7c36-e711-80c9-005056af4099>.
Amir, Sulfikar. ‘Rethinking Design Policy in the Third World’. Design Issues 20.4 (2004): 68–75. Web.
Appadurai, A. ‘Deep Democracy: Urban Governmentality and the Horizon of Politics’. Environment and Urbanization 13.2 (2001): 23–43. Web.
Awan, Nishat, Tatjana Schneider, and Jeremy Till. ‘Chapter 3: The Operations of Spatial Agency’. Spatial Agency: Other Ways of Doing Architecture. London: Routledge, 2011. 69–82. Web. <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=491ebea7-5536-e711-80c9-005056af4099>.
Barry, Janice et al. ‘Unsettling Planning Theory’. Planning Theory 17.3 (2018): 418–438. Web.
Bell, Bryan, and Katie Wakeford. Expanding Architecture: Design as Activism. New York: Metropolis Books, 2008. Print.
Blundell Jones, Peter, Doina Petrescu, and Jeremy Till, eds. Architecture and Participation. London: Routledge, 2012. Web. <http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203022863>.
Blunt, Alison, and Robyn M Dowling. ‘Setting up Home: An Introduction’. Home. Key ideas in geography. London: Routledge, 2006. 1–31. Web. <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=2394bfc2-9536-e711-80c9-005056af4099>.
Boano, Camillo, and Giorgio Talocci. ‘Fences and Profanations: Questioning the Sacredness of Urban Design’. Journal of Urban Design 19.5 (2014): 700–721. Web.
Bower, Richard. Architecture and Space Re-Imagined: Learning from the Difference, Multiplicity, and Otherness of Development Practice. Routledge Research in Place, Space and Politics. New York: Routledge, 2017. Web. <http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315678146>.
Burgess, Jacquelin, Carolyn M. Harrison, and Melanie Limb. ‘People, Parks and the Urban Green: A Study of Popular Meanings and Values for Open Spaces in the City’. Urban Studies 25.6 (1988): 455–473. Web.
Burgess, Rod, Marisa Carmona, and Theo Kolstee. ‘Contemporary Policies for Enablement and Participation : A Critical Review’. The Challenge of Sustainable Cities: Neoliberalism and Urban Strategies in Developing Countries. London: Zed, 1997. 138–162. Web. <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=9c4bae9a-8a36-e711-80c9-005056af4099>.
Camillo Boano and William Hunter. ‘Collaboration and the Conflictual’. The Nightmare of Participation: [Crossbench Praxis as a Mode of Criticality]. Berlin: Sternberg Press, 2010. 91–104. Print.
Carabelli, Giulia. ‘Grassroots Movements and the Production of (Other) Space(s) - Published in The Divided City and the Grassroots: The (Un)Making of Ethnic Divisions in Mostar’. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, 2018. Web. <http://ucl.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&amp;package_service_id=3192314340004761&amp;institutionId=4761&amp;customerId=4760>.
---. The Divided City and the Grassroots: The (Un)Making of Ethnic Divisions in Mostar. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, 2018. Web. <http://ucl.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=3192314340004761&institutionId=4761&customerId=4760>.
Catalina Ortiz and Camillo Boano. ‘The Medellín’s Shifting Geopolitics of Informality : The Encircled Garden as a Dispositive of Civil Disenfranchisement?’ N.p. 189–207. Web. <https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/e/9781317333562/chapters/10.4324%2F9781315659275-16>.
Choguill, Marisa B.Guaraldo. ‘A Ladder of Community Participation for Underdeveloped Countries’. Habitat International 20.3 (1996): 431–444. Web.
Cleaver, F. ‘Institutions, Agency and the Limitations of Participatory Approaches to Development’. Participation: The New Tyranny?. London: Zed Books, 2001. 36–55. Print.
Cooke, Bill, and Uma Kothari. ‘The Case for Participation as Tyranny’. Participation: The New Tyranny?. London: Zed Books, 2001. 1–15. Web. <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=c4bd2ae2-8a36-e711-80c9-005056af4099>.
---. ‘The Case for Participation as Tyranny’. Participation: The New Tyranny?. London: Zed Books, 2001. 1–15. Web. <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=c4bd2ae2-8a36-e711-80c9-005056af4099>.
Coole, Diana. ‘Experiencing Discourse: Corporeal Communicators and the Embodiment of Power’. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 9.3 (2007): 413–433. Web.
Cornwall, A, and V S P Coelho. ‘Spaces for Change?: The Politics of Participation in New Democratic Arenas’. Spaces for Change?: The Politics of Citizen Participation in New Democratic Arenas. Claiming citizenship. London: Zed, 2007. 1–29. Web. <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=722bea86-8336-e711-80c9-005056af4099>.
Cornwall, Andrea. ‘Historical Perspectives on Participation in Development’. Commonwealth & Comparative Politics 44.1 (2006): 62–83. Web.
Cowan, Rob. ‘Placecheck: A User’s Guide. ’. 2001 : n. pag. Print.
D. M. Petrescu and K. Trogal. ‘The Social (Re)Production of Architecture in “Crisis-Riddled” Times’. The Social (Re)Production of Architecture: Politics, Values and Actions in Contemporary Practice. Ed. Doina Petrescu and Kim Trogal. London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 2017. Web. <https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315717180>.
de Souza, Marcelo Lopes. ‘Together with the State, despite the State, against the State. Social Movements as “Critical Urban Planning” Agents’. City 10.3 (2006): 327–342. Web.
Derickson, Kate Driscoll. ‘On the Politics of Recognition in Critical Urban Scholarship’. Urban Geography 37.6 (2016): 824–829. Web.
Doreen Massey. ‘Politics and Space/Time’. New Left Review 196 (1992): n. pag. Web. <https://newleftreview.org/I/196/doreen-massey-politics-and-space-time>.
Doucet, Isabelle. ‘Understanding Social Engagement in Architecture’. The Routledge Companion to Architecture and Social Engagement. Ed. Farhan Karim. New York, NY: Routledge, 2018. Web. <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=3a3e354f-f5fd-e811-80cd-005056af4099>.
Dovey, K. ‘Home and Homelessness’. Home Environments. Human behavior and environment. New York: Plenum Press, 1985. 33–64. Web. <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=8e4fc2f6-4f36-e711-80c9-005056af4099>.
‘Environment and Urbanization’. n. pag. Web. <http://journals.sagepub.com/loi/eau>.
‘---’. n. pag. Web. <http://journals.sagepub.com/loi/eau>.
Erfan, Aftab. ‘Confronting Collective Traumas: An Exploration of Therapeutic Planning’. Planning Theory & Practice 18.1 (2017): 34–50. Web.
Eyben, Rosalind, Colette Harris, and Jethro Pettit. ‘Introduction: Exploring Power for Change’. IDS Bulletin 37.6 (2006): 1–10. Web.
Fawaz, Mona. ‘Hezbollah as Urban Planner? Questions To and From Planning Theory’. Planning Theory 8.4 (2009): 323–334. Web.
Fenster, Tovi. ‘Cognitive Temporal Mapping: The Three Steps Method in Urban Planning’. Planning Theory & Practice 10.4 (2009): 479–498. Web.
Flowerdew, Robin, and David Martin. Methods in Human Geography: A Guide for Students Doing a Research Project. 2nd ed. Harlow: Prentice Hall, 2005. Web. <http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=UCL&amp;isbn=9781405898416>.
Forester, John. ‘Making Participation Work When Interests Conflict: Moving from Facilitating Dialogue and Moderating Debate to Mediating Negotiations’. Journal of the American Planning Association 72.4 (2006): 447–456. Web.
Foucault, Michel. ‘The Eye of Power’. Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972-1977. Harlow: Longman, 1980. 146–165. Print.
Fraser, Nancy. ‘Rethinking Recognition’. New Left Review 3 1103–1124. Web. <https://newleftreview.org/II/3/nancy-fraser-rethinking-recognition>.
Frediani, Alex, and Camillo Boano. ‘Processes for Just Products: The Capability Space of Participatory Design’. The Capability Approach, Technology and Design. London: Springer, 2012. Web. <https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007%2F978-94-007-3879-9>.
Frediani, Alexandre Apsan. ‘Re-Imagining Participatory Design: Reflecting on the ASF-UK Change by Design Methodology’. Design Issues 32.3 (2016): 98–111. Web.
Frediani, Apsan A, and Camillo Boano. ‘Processes for Just Products: The Capability Space of Participatory Design’. The Capability Approach, Technology and Design. Philosophy of engineering and technology. Dordrecht: Springer, 2012. 203–222. Web. <https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007%2F978-94-007-3879-9>.
Freire, Paulo, and Myra Bergman Ramos. Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New revised edition. London: Penguin Books, 1996. Print.
Gaventa, John, and Gregory Barrett. ‘So What Difference Does It Make? Mapping the Outcomes of Citizen Engagement’. IDS Working Papers 2010.347 (2010): 01–72. Web.
Glass, J. ‘Facing the Future by Designing in Resilience: An Architectural Perspective’. Hazards and the Built Environment: Attaining Built-in Resilience. Abingdon: Routledge, 2008. 172–188. Web. <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=ad954536-5536-e711-80c9-005056af4099>.
Hamdi, N. ‘Chapter 9. Reasoning to Scale’. The Placemaker’s Guide to Building Community. Tools for community planning. London: Earthscan, 2010. 160–153. Print.
Hamdi, Nabeel. ‘Chapter 3. Deciding How to Decide’. The Spacemaker’s Guide to Big Change: Design and Improvisation in Development Practice. Earthscan tools for community planning. New York, NY: Routledge, 2014. Web. <http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315773315>.
---. ‘Chapter 6. In Search of a Community and Structure of Place’. Small Change: The Art of Practice and the Limits of Planning in Cities. London: Earthscan, 2004. 58–72. Print.
---. ‘Chapter 7. Participation in Practice’. The Spacemaker’s Guide to Big Change: Design and Improvisation in Development Practice. Earthscan tools for community planning. New York, NY: Routledge, 2014. Web. <http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315773315>.
---. ‘Chapter 8. PEAS and the Sociable Side of Practice’. The Placemaker’s Guide to Building Community. Tools for community planning. London: Earthscan, 2010. 141–152. Print.
---. ‘Chapter 11. Governance and Networks: Organizing from inside Out’. Small Change: The Art of Practice and the Limits of Planning in Cities. London: Earthscan, 2004. 107–115. Print.
---. ‘Chapter 12. Insiders Out and Outsiders: Practical Wisdom and the Co-Production of Knowledge’. The Spacemaker’s Guide to Big Change: Design and Improvisation in Development Practice. Earthscan tools for community planning. New York, NY: Routledge, 2014. Web. <http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315773315>.
---. Small Change: The Art of Practice and the Limits of Planning in Cities. London: Earthscan, 2004. Print.
Hamdi, Nabeel, and Reinhard Goethert. ‘Chapter 2. Action Planning In Theory’. Action Planning for Cities: A Guide to Community Practice. Chichester: John Wiley, 1997. 23–59. Print.
Haraway, Donna. ‘Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective’. Feminist Studies 14.3 (1988): n. pag. Web.
Hickey, Samuel, and Giles Mohan. ‘Towards Participation as Transformation: Critical Themes and Challenges’. Participation: From Tyranny to Transformation? : Exploring New Approaches to Participation in Development. London: Zed, 2004. 3–24. Web. <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=1893885c-8336-e711-80c9-005056af4099>.
Hirst, Paul Q. Space and Power: Politics, War and Architecture. Cambridge: Polity, 2005. Print.
Hou, Jeffrey. ‘Citizen Design: Participation and Beyond.’ Companion to Urban Design. Routledge, 2014. Web. <http://www.routledgehandbooks.com/doi/10.4324/9780203844434.ch25>.
Irazábal, C. ‘Public, Private, People Partnerships (PPPPs): Reflections from Latin American Cases’. Private Communities and Urban Governance: Theoretical and Comparative Perspectives. Ed. Amnon Lehavi. Switzerland: Springer, 2016. 191–214. Web. <http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&amp;AuthType=ip,shib&amp;db=nlebk&amp;AN=1224661&amp;site=ehost-live&amp;scope=site>.
Jenkins, Paul, Harry Smith, and Ya Ping Wang. ‘Post-1990 Issues in Planning and Housing’. Planning and Housing in the Rapidly Urbanising World. Housing, planning, and design series. London: Routledge, 2007. 178–203. Web. <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=ee5bfbd5-9536-e711-80c9-005056af4099>.
Jeremy Till. ‘Imperfect Ethics’. Architecture Depends. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 2009. 171–187. Web. <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=730082ec-4e36-e711-80c9-005056af4099>.
John Forester. ‘Listening: The Social Policy of Everyday Life in Planning in the Face of Power. University of California Press, Berkeley’. Planning in the Face of Power. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1989. Web. <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=a080e248-73f4-e711-80cd-005056af4099>.
Kaminer, T. ‘Theories of Participation, Theories of Contestation’. The Efficacy of Architecture: Political Contestation and Agency. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge, 2017. Print.
Kindon, Sara Louise, Rachel Pain, and Mike Kesby. ‘Participatory Action Research: Origins, Approaches and Methods’. Participatory Action Research Approaches and Methods: Connecting People, Participation and Place. Routledge studies in human geography. Abingdon: Routledge, 2007. 9–18. Web. <https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/e/9781134135561>.
Komarova, Milena, and Martina McKnight. ‘“We Are Watching You Too”: Reflections on Doing Visual Research in a Contested City’. Sociological Research Online 18.1 (2013): n. pag. Web.
Kumar, Somesh. ‘Conceptual Specifications’. Methods for Community Participation: A Complete Guide for Practitioners. Rugby: Practical Action Publishing, 2002. 23–52. Web. <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=ca0786a4-8836-e711-80c9-005056af4099>.
Lahoud, Adrian. ‘Post-Traumatic Urbanism’. Architectural Design 80.5 (2010): 14–23. Web.
Lane, Barbara Miller. ‘What Is Home?’ Housing and Dwelling: Perspectives on Modern Domestic Architecture. Abingdon: Routledge, 2007. 50–73. Web. <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=f87a55cc-9536-e711-80c9-005056af4099>.
Laura Roth, and Kate Shea Baird. ‘Municipalism and the Feminization of Politics’. ROAR Magazine, n.d. Web. <https://roarmag.org/magazine/municipalism-feminization-urban-politics/>.
Lee, Yanki. ‘Design Participation Tactics: The Challenges and New Roles for Designers in the Co-Design Process’. CoDesign 4.1 (2008): 31–50. Web.
Leivas, Monique. ‘From the Body to the City: Participatory Action Research with Social Cartography for Transformative Education and Global Citizenship’. Educational Action Research (2018): 1–16. Web.
Loo, S. ‘Design-Ing Ethics: The Good, the Bad and the Performative’. Design and Ethics: Reflections on Practice. London: Routledge, 2012. Web. <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=f6e15cf3-5536-e711-80c9-005056af4099>.
Luansang, C., S. Boonmahathanakorn, and M. L. Domingo-Price. ‘The Role of Community Architects in Upgrading; Reflecting on the Experience in Asia’. Environment and Urbanization 24.2 (2012): 497–512. Web.
Luansang, Chawanad, Supawut Boonmahathanakorn, and Maria Lourdes Domingo-Price. ‘The Role of Community Architects in Upgrading; Reflecting on the Experience in Asia’. Environment and Urbanization 24.2 (2012): 497–512. Web.
Luck, Rachael. ‘Learning to Talk to Users in Participatory Design Situations’. Design Studies 28.3 (2007): 217–242. Web.
Madanipour, Ali. ‘Introduction’. Whose Public Space?: International Case Studies in Urban Design and Development. London: Routledge, 2010. 1–15. Web. <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=e4a879a0-5536-e711-80c9-005056af4099>.
Marcuse, Peter. ‘From Critical Urban Theory to the Right to the City’. City 13.2–3 (2009): 185–197. Web.
Markus, Thomas A., and Deborah Cameron. ‘Why Language Matters’. The Words between the Spaces: Buildings and Language. The architext series. London: Routledge, 2002. 1–17. Web. <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=9f5a20ed-8b33-e911-80cd-005056af4099>.
Martens, Karel. ‘Participatory Experiments from the Bottom up: The Role of Environmental NGOs and Citizen Groups’. European Journal of Spatial Development 18 (2005): 1–20. Web. <https://archive.nordregio.se/European-Journal-of-Spatial-Development/Archive/2005/index.html>.
Martin, Deborah, Eugene McCann, and Mark Purcell. ‘Space, Scale, Governance, and Representation: Contemporary Geographical Perspectives on Urban Politics and Policy’. Journal of Urban Affairs 25.2 (2003): 113–121. Web.
Mattila, Hanna. ‘Aesthetic Justice and Urban Planning: Who Ought to Have the Right to Design Cities?’ GeoJournal 58.2/3 (2002): 131–138. Web.
‘McDowell, L (1992a), Doing Gender: Feminism, Feminists and Research Methods in Human Geography. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series 17 399–416’. n. pag. Web. <http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/pdf/Doing_Gender.pdf>.
McFarlane, Colin. ‘Knowledge, Learning and Development: A Post-Rationalist Approach’. Progress in Development Studies 6.4 (2006): 287–305. Web.
Miessen, Markus. ‘Collaboration and the Conflictual, Published in The Nightmare of Participation - p. 91-104’. Berlin: Sternberg Press, 2010. Print.
Miraftab, F. ‘Insurgency and Spaces of Active Citizenship: The Story of Western Cape Anti-Eviction Campaign in South Africa’. Journal of Planning Education and Research 25.2 (2005): 200–217. Web.
Miraftab, Faranak. ‘Making Neo-Liberal Governance: The Disempowering Work of Empowerment’. International Planning Studies 9.4 (2004): 239–259. Web.
Mitlin, D. ‘With and beyond the State -- Co-Production as a Route to Political Influence, Power and Transformation for Grassroots Organizations’. Environment and Urbanization 20.2 (2008): 339–360. Web.
Mitlin, D., and J. Thompson. ‘Participatory Approaches in Urban Areas: Strengthening Civil Society or        Reinforcing the Status Quo?’ Environment and Urbanization 7.1 (1995): 231–250. Web.
Mitlin, Diana, and Sheridan Bartlett. ‘Editorial: Co-Production – Key Ideas’. Environment and Urbanization 30.2 (2018): 355–366. Web.
Mitlin, Diana, and David Satterthwaite. Empowering Squatter Citizen: Local Government, Civil Society and Urban Poverty Reduction. London: Earthscan, 2004. Print.
Moser, Caroline O.N. ‘Community Participation in Urban Projects in the Third World’. Progress in Planning 32 (1989): 71–133. Web.
Mouffe, Chantal. Agonistics: Thinking the World Politically. London: Verso, 2013. Print.
Mukhija, Vinit. ‘Urban Design for a Planet of Informal Cities’. Companion to Urban Design. Routledge, 2014. Web. <http://www.routledgehandbooks.com/doi/10.4324/9780203844434.ch43>.
Patel, Sheela, and Diana Mitlin. ‘Grassroots-Driven Development: The Alliance of SPARC, the National Slum Dwellers Federation and Mahila Milan’. Empowering Squatter Citizen: Local Government, Civil Society and Urban Poverty Reduction. London: Earthscan, 2004. 216–241. Web. <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=5b1d1c38-8436-e711-80c9-005056af4099>.
Petrescu, Doina, and Prue Chiles. ‘Agency: Alternative Practices and Alternative Worlds’. Architectural Research Quarterly 13.02 (2009): n. pag. Web.
Petrescu, Doina, and Constantin Petcou. ‘Tactics for a Transgressive Practice’. Architectural Design 83.6 (2013): 58–65. Web.
Petrescu, Doina, Constantin Petcou, and Corelia Baibarac. ‘Co-Producing Commons-Based Resilience: Lessons from R-Urban’. Building Research & Information 44.7 (2016): 717–736. Web.
‘Progress in Human Geography’. n. pag. Web. <https://search.proquest.com/publication/37137>.
Ramirez, R. ‘Integrated Informality in the Barrios of Havana’. Rethinking the Informal City: Critical Perspectives from Latin America. Remapping cultural history. New York: Berghahn Books, 2010. 137–162. Web. <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=222f22f0-8536-e711-80c9-005056af4099>.
Read, Clancy et al. ‘Applying a Practical, Participatory Action Research Framework for Producing Knowledge, Action and Change in Communities: A Health Case Study from Gujarat, Western India’. M2 Models and Methodologies for Community Engagement. Ed. Reena Tiwari, Marina Lommerse, and Dianne Smith. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2014. 91–105. Web. <http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-981-4585-11-8_6>.
Rendell, Jane. ‘Only Resist: Five Particular Qualities Might Characterise a Specifically Feminist Approach to Critical Spatial Practice, Suggests Jane Rendell.’ Architectural Review 243.1449 (2018): 8–18. Web. <http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&amp;AuthType=ip,shib&amp;db=asu&amp;AN=128870014&amp;site=ehost-live&amp;scope=site>.
Rios, Michael. ‘Envisioning Citizenship: Toward a Polity Approach in Urban Design’. Journal of Urban Design 13.2 (2008): 213–229. Web.
Robinson, J. ‘White Women Researching/Representing “Others”: From Antiapartheid to Postcolonialism?’ Writing Women and Space: Colonial and Postcolonial Geographies. Mappings. New York: Guilford Press, 1994. 197–228. Print.
Rolnik, Raquel. ‘Place, Inhabitance and Citizenship: The Right to Housing and the Right to the City in the Contemporary Urban World’. International Journal of Housing Policy 14.3 (2014): 293–300. Web.
Rose, G. ‘Situating Knowledges: Positionality, Reflexivities and Other Tactics’. Progress in Human Geography 21.3 (1997): 305–320. Web.
Roy, Ananya. ‘Civic Governmentality: The Politics of Inclusion in Beirut and Mumbai’. Antipode 41.1 (2009): 159–179. Web.
---. ‘Who’s Afraid of Postcolonial Theory?’ International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 40.1 (2016): 200–209. Web.
Russell, Bertie. ‘Radical Municipalism: Demanding the Future’. openDemocracy, 26 July 2017. Web. <https://www.opendemocracy.net/plan-c/radical-municipalism-demanding-future>.
Saba Golchehr. ‘Data-Driven Design for Civic Participation : Introducing Digital Methods for on-Going Civic Engagement for Design in Public Space’. 56–70. Web. <https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781315110332/chapters/10.4324/9781315110332-5>.
Sandercock, Leonie. ‘Re/Presenting Planning’s Histories’. Towards Cosmopolis: Planning for Multicultural Cities. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 1998. 33–54. Web. <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=a57f9aa3-151e-ed11-bd6e-a04a5e5d2f8d>.
Sandercock, Leonie, and Giovanni Attili. ‘Digital Ethnography as Planning Praxis: An Experiment with Film as Social Research, Community Engagement and Policy Dialogue’. Planning Theory & Practice 11.1 (2010): 23–45. Web.
Sanoff, Henry. ‘Multiple Views of Participatory Design’. International Journal of Architectural Research: ArchNet-IJAR 2.1 (2014): 57–69. Web. <http://www.archnet-ijar.net/index.php/IJAR/article/view/177>.
SARA KINDON. ‘Participatory Action Research: Origins, Approaches and Methods’. 35–44. Web. <https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781134135561/chapters/10.4324/9780203933671-13>.
Sarkissian, W. and Bunjamin-Mau, W. et al. ‘Designing and Managing a Workshop’. SpeakOut: The Step-by-Step Guide to SpeakOuts and Community Workshops. Tools for community planning. London: Earthscan, 2009. Web. <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=55416db3-8436-e711-80c9-005056af4099>.
Schindler, Seth. ‘Towards a Paradigm of Southern Urbanism’. City 21.1 (2017): 47–64. Web.
Schuermans, Nick, and Caroline Newton. ‘Being a Young and Foreign Researcher in South Africa: Towards a Postcolonial Dialogue’. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography 33.3 (2012): 295–300. Web.
Seymour, W. ‘Exhuming the Body: Revisiting the Role of the Visible Body in Ethnographic Research’. Qualitative Health Research 17.9 (2007): 1188–1197. Web.
Siemiatycki, Matti. ‘The Role of the Planning Scholar’. Journal of Planning Education and Research 32.2 (2012): 147–159. Web.
Sun, Xiaoyi, and Ronggui Huang. ‘Spatial Meaning-Making and Urban Activism: Two Tales of Anti-PX Protests in Urban China’. Journal of Urban Affairs (2018): 1–21. Web.
Sundberg, Juanita. ‘Looking for the Critical Geographer, or Why Bodies and Geographies Matter to the Emergence of Critical Geographies of Latin America’. Geoforum 36.1 (2005): 17–28. Web.
Swyngedouw, Erik, and Japhy Wilson. ‘Insurgent Architects and the Spectral Return of the Urban Political’. Planning against the Political: Democratic Deficits in European Territorial Governance. Ed. Jonathan Metzger, Philip Allmendinger, and Stijn Oosterlynck. New York: Routledge, 2015. 215–225. Web. <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=20930d20-33c9-e711-80cd-005056af4099>.
Thomas Abbot, Roxana Aslan, Riley O’Brien and Nathan Serafin. ‘Embrace Abolitionist Planning to Fight Trumpism’. Progressive City, n.d. Web. <https://www.progressivecity.net/single-post/2018/04/06/EMBRACE-ABOLITIONIST-PLANNING-TO-FIGHT-TRUMPISM>.
Till, Jeremy. ‘Architecture of the Impure Community’. Occupying Architecture: Between the Architect and the User. Ed. Jonathan Hill. London: Routledge, 1998. 34–42. Web. <http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203983829>.
---. ‘Imperfect Ethics’. Architecture Depends. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 2009. 171–187. Web. <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=730082ec-4e36-e711-80c9-005056af4099>.
Turner, J. F. C. ‘Issues in Self-Help and Self-Managed Housing’. Self-Help Housing: A Critique. London: Mansell, 1982. 99–113. Web. <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=c2ed8bb4-6536-e711-80c9-005056af4099>.
Umemoto, Kare. ‘Walking in Another’s Shoes’. Journal of Planning Education and Research 21.1 (2001): 17–31. Web.
‘View of Toward an Architecture of Dissensus: Participatory Urbanism in South-East Asia - Boano, C. and Kelling, E. (2013)’. n. pag. Web. <https://journals.open.tudelft.nl/index.php/footprint/article/view/Boano/945>.
Wahby, Noura. ‘Institutions and Populism in the Global South-Lessons for the Brexit-Trump Era’. City & Community 16.2 (2017): 139–144. Web.
Wates, Nick. ‘General Principles A-Z’. Community Planning Handbook : How People Can Shape Their Cities, Towns and Villages in Any Part of the World. London: Earthscan Publications Ltd, 2000. 11–21. Print.
Watson, V. ‘Seeing from the South: Refocusing Urban Planning on the Globe’s Central Urban Issues’. Urban Studies 46.11 (2009): 2259–2275. Web.
Watson, Vanessa. ‘Deep Difference: Diversity, Planning and Ethics’. Planning Theory 5.1 (2006): 31–50. Web.
‘We Drew What We Imagined: Participatory Mapping Performance, and Arts of Landscape Making, • Sletto, B. I., (2009)’. n. pag. Web. <http://www.iapad.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/Sletto_CA_August_20091.pdf>.
Winkler, Tanja. ‘Black Texts on White Paper: Learning to                              Resistant Texts as an Approach towards Decolonising Planning’. Planning Theory (2017): n. pag. Web.
Yacobi, Haim. ‘Social Exclusion, Housing Environment and Tolerant Planning: The Case of the Jahelin Bedouin Tribe. Hagar - International Social Science Review. 69-84’. Hagar international social science review = Hājir 5.1 (2004): 69–83. Print.
---. ‘The NGOization of Space: Dilemmas of Social Change, Planning Policy, and the Israeli Public Sphere’. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 25.4 (2007): 745–758. Web.
Yacobi, Haim, Jonathan Ventura, and Sharon Danzig. ‘Walls, Enclaves and the (Counter) Politics of Design’. Journal of Urban Design 21.4 (2016): 481–494. Web.
Zetter, Roger. ‘Market Enablement or Sustainable Development : The Conflicting Paradigms of Urbanization’. Planning in Cities: Sustainability and Growth in the Developing World. Urban management series. London: ITDG, 2002. 31–42. Web. <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=bea9ee93-8836-e711-80c9-005056af4099>.