1.
A. Cuthbert. Chapter  6:  Urban Design and Spatial Political Economy. in Companion to Urban Design (Routledge, 2014). doi:10.4324/9780203844434.
2.
Martin, D., McCann, E. & Purcell, M. Space, Scale, Governance, and Representation: Contemporary Geographical Perspectives on Urban Politics and Policy. Journal of Urban Affairs 25, 113–121 (2003).
3.
Sanoff, H. Multiple views of participatory design. International Journal of Architectural Research: ArchNet-IJAR 2, 57–69 (2014).
4.
Watson, V. Seeing from the South: Refocusing Urban Planning on the Globe’s Central Urban Issues. Urban Studies 46, 2259–2275 (2009).
5.
Schindler, S. Towards a paradigm of Southern urbanism. City 21, 47–64 (2017).
6.
Barry, J. et al. Unsettling planning theory. Planning Theory 17, 418–438 (2018).
7.
Doreen Massey. Politics and Space/Time. New Left Review 196, (1992).
8.
Rios, M. Envisioning Citizenship: Toward a Polity Approach in Urban Design. Journal of Urban Design 13, 213–229 (2008).
9.
Roy, A. Who’s Afraid of Postcolonial Theory? International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 40, 200–209 (2016).
10.
McFarlane, C. Knowledge, learning and development: a post-rationalist approach. Progress in Development Studies 6, 287–305 (2006).
11.
Cornwall, A. Historical perspectives on participation in development. Commonwealth & Comparative Politics 44, 62–83 (2006).
12.
A. Escobar. The making and the unmaking of the third world through development. in The post-development reader (Zed Books, 1996).
13.
Hickey, S. & Mohan, G. Towards Participation as Transformation: Critical Themes and Challenges. in Participation: from tyranny to transformation? : exploring new approaches to participation in development 3–24 (Zed, 2004).
14.
Mitlin, D. With and beyond the state -- co-production as a route to political influence, power and transformation for grassroots organizations. Environment and Urbanization 20, 339–360 (2008).
15.
Rendell, J. Only resist: Five particular qualities might characterise a specifically feminist approach to critical spatial practice, suggests Jane Rendell. Architectural Review 243, 8–18 (2018).
16.
Miraftab, F. Making neo-liberal governance: the disempowering work of empowerment. International Planning Studies 9, 239–259 (2004).
17.
Derickson, K. D. On the politics of recognition in critical urban scholarship. Urban Geography 37, 824–829 (2016).
18.
Irazábal, C. Public, Private, People Partnerships (PPPPs): Reflections from Latin American Cases. in Private communities and urban governance: theoretical and comparative perspectives (ed. Lehavi, A.) 191–214 (Springer, 2016).
19.
Gaventa, J. & Barrett, G. So What Difference Does it Make? Mapping the Outcomes of Citizen Engagement. IDS Working Papers 2010, 01–72 (2010).
20.
Roy, A. Civic Governmentality: The Politics of Inclusion in Beirut and Mumbai. Antipode 41, 159–179 (2009).
21.
Catalina Ortiz and Camillo Boano. The Medellín’s shifting geopolitics of informality : The Encircled Garden as a dispositive of civil disenfranchisement? in 189–207 doi:10.4324/9781315659275-16.
22.
Marcuse, P. From critical urban theory to the right to the city. City 13, 185–197 (2009).
23.
Sun, X. & Huang, R. Spatial meaning-making and urban activism: Two tales of anti-PX protests in urban China. Journal of Urban Affairs 1–21 (2018) doi:10.1080/07352166.2018.1443010.
24.
Rolnik, R. Place, inhabitance and citizenship: the right to housing and the right to the city in the contemporary urban world. International Journal of Housing Policy 14, 293–300 (2014).
25.
Bell, B. & Wakeford, K. Expanding architecture: design as activism. (Metropolis Books, 2008).
26.
Miraftab, F. Insurgency and Spaces of Active Citizenship: The Story of Western Cape Anti-eviction Campaign in South Africa. Journal of Planning Education and Research 25, 200–217 (2005).
27.
Winkler, T. Black texts on white paper: Learning to                              resistant texts as an approach towards decolonising planning. Planning Theory (2017) doi:10.1177/1473095217739335.
28.
Al-Harithy, H. The participative discourse: community activism in post-war reconstruction. in Urban design in the Arab world: reconceptualizing boundaries (ed. Saliba, R.) vol. Design and the built environment series 39–50 (Ashgate, 2015).
29.
Carabelli, G. Grassroots Movements and the Production of (Other) Space(s) - published in The divided city and the grassroots: the (un)making of ethnic divisions in Mostar. in (Palgrave Macmillan, 2018).
30.
Erfan, A. Confronting collective traumas: an exploration of therapeutic planning. Planning Theory & Practice 18, 34–50 (2017).
31.
Fawaz, M. Hezbollah as Urban Planner? Questions To and From Planning Theory. Planning Theory 8, 323–334 (2009).
32.
Lahoud, A. Post-Traumatic Urbanism. Architectural Design 80, 14–23 (2010).
33.
Thomas Abbot, Roxana Aslan, Riley O’Brien and Nathan Serafin. Embrace abolitionist planning to fight Trumpism. https://www.progressivecity.net/single-post/2018/04/06/EMBRACE-ABOLITIONIST-PLANNING-TO-FIGHT-TRUMPISM.
34.
Petrescu, D., Petcou, C. & Baibarac, C. Co-producing commons-based resilience: lessons from R-Urban. Building Research & Information 44, 717–736 (2016).
35.
Carabelli, G. The divided city and the grassroots: the (un)making of ethnic divisions in Mostar. (Palgrave Macmillan, 2018).
36.
de Souza, M. L. Together with the state, despite the state, against the state. Social Movements as ‘Critical Urban Planning’ Agents. City 10, 327–342 (2006).
37.
Awan, N., Schneider, T. & Till, J. Chapter 3: The operations of spatial agency. in Spatial agency: other ways of doing architecture 69–82 (Routledge, 2011).
38.
Mukhija, V. Urban Design for a Planet of Informal Cities. in Companion to Urban Design (Routledge, 2014). doi:10.4324/9780203844434.ch43.
39.
Mattila, H. Aesthetic justice and urban planning: Who ought to have the right to design cities? GeoJournal 58, 131–138 (2002).
40.
Frediani, A. A. Re-imagining Participatory Design: Reflecting on the ASF-UK Change by Design Methodology. Design Issues 32, 98–111 (2016).
41.
Appadurai, A. Deep democracy: urban governmentality and the horizon of politics. Environment and Urbanization 13, 23–43 (2001).
42.
Architecture and participation. (Routledge, 2012).
43.
AbdouMaliq Simone , and  Edgar Pieterse. New Urban Worlds : Inhabiting Dissonant Times. (Polity Press, 2017).
44.
Laura Roth & Kate Shea Baird. Municipalism and the Feminization of Politics. https://roarmag.org/magazine/municipalism-feminization-urban-politics/.
45.
Loo, S. Design-Ing Ethics: the Good, the Bad and the Performative. in Design and ethics: reflections on practice (Routledge, 2012).
46.
Hou, J. Citizen Design: participation and beyond. in Companion to Urban Design (Routledge, 2014). doi:10.4324/9780203844434.ch25.
47.
Luansang, C., Boonmahathanakorn, S. & Domingo-Price, M. L. The role of community architects in upgrading; reflecting on the experience in Asia. Environment and Urbanization 24, 497–512 (2012).
48.
Wahby, N. Institutions and Populism in the Global South-Lessons for the Brexit-Trump Era. City & Community 16, 139–144 (2017).
49.
Umemoto, K. Walking in Another’s Shoes. Journal of Planning Education and Research 21, 17–31 (2001).
50.
Lee, Y. Design participation tactics: the challenges and new roles for designers in the co-design process. CoDesign 4, 31–50 (2008).
51.
Choguill, M. B. G. A ladder of community participation for underdeveloped countries. Habitat International 20, 431–444 (1996).
52.
Frediani, A. & Boano, C. Processes for Just Products: the Capability Space of Participatory Design. in The capability approach, technology and design (Springer, 2012).
53.
Boano, C. & Talocci, G. Fences and Profanations: Questioning the Sacredness of Urban Design. Journal of Urban Design 19, 700–721 (2014).
54.
Hirst, P. Q. Space and power: politics, war and architecture. (Polity, 2005).
55.
View of Toward an Architecture of Dissensus: Participatory Urbanism in South-East Asia - Boano, C. and Kelling, E. (2013).
56.
Doucet, I. Understanding social engagement in architecture. in The Routledge companion to architecture and social engagement (ed. Karim, F.) (Routledge, 2018).
57.
Luansang, C., Boonmahathanakorn, S. & Domingo-Price, M. L. The role of community architects in upgrading; reflecting on the experience in Asia. Environment and Urbanization 24, 497–512 (2012).
58.
Till, J. Architecture of the Impure Community. in Occupying architecture: between the architect and the user (ed. Hill, J.) 34–42 (Routledge, 1998).
59.
Cleaver, F. Institutions, Agency and the Limitations of Participatory Approaches to Development. in Participation: The New Tyranny? 36–55 (Zed Books, 2001).
60.
Forester, J. Making Participation Work When Interests Conflict: Moving from Facilitating Dialogue and Moderating Debate to Mediating Negotiations. Journal of the American Planning Association 72, 447–456 (2006).
61.
Russell, B. Radical municipalism: demanding the future. https://www.opendemocracy.net/plan-c/radical-municipalism-demanding-future (2017).
62.
Siemiatycki, M. The Role of the Planning Scholar. Journal of Planning Education and Research 32, 147–159 (2012).
63.
Fraser, Nancy. Rethinking Recognition. New Left Review 3, 1103–1124.
64.
Martens, K. Participatory Experiments from the Bottom up: The role of environmental NGOs and citizen groups. European Journal of Spatial Development 18, 1–20 (2005).
65.
Watson, V. Deep Difference: Diversity, Planning and Ethics. Planning Theory 5, 31–50 (2006).
66.
Yacobi, H. The NGOization of Space: Dilemmas of Social Change, Planning Policy, and the Israeli Public Sphere. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 25, 745–758 (2007).
67.
Yacobi, H., Ventura, J. & Danzig, S. Walls, enclaves and the (counter) politics of design. Journal of Urban Design 21, 481–494 (2016).
68.
John Forester. Listening: the social policy of everyday life in Planning in the Face of Power. University of California Press, Berkeley. in Planning in the face of power (University of California Press, 1989).
69.
Markus, T. A. & Cameron, D. Why language matters. in The words between the spaces: buildings and language vol. The architext series 1–17 (Routledge, 2002).
70.
Fenster, T. Cognitive Temporal Mapping: The Three Steps Method in Urban Planning. Planning Theory & Practice 10, 479–498 (2009).
71.
Akhil  Gupta and Ferguson, D. Discipline and Practice:"The Field” As Site, Method, and Location In Anthropology. …  locations: Boundaries and grounds of a  ….
72.
McDowell, L (1992a), Doing gender: Feminism, feminists and research methods in human geography. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series 17 399–416.
73.
Read, C., Earnest, J., Ali, M. & Poonacha, V. Applying a Practical, Participatory Action Research Framework for Producing Knowledge, Action and Change in Communities: A Health Case Study from Gujarat, Western India. in M2 Models and Methodologies for Community Engagement (eds. Tiwari, R., Lommerse, M. & Smith, D.) 91–105 (Springer Singapore, 2014). doi:10.1007/978-981-4585-11-8_6.
74.
Leivas, M. From the body to the city: participatory action research with social cartography for transformative education and global citizenship. Educational Action Research 1–16 (2018) doi:10.1080/09650792.2018.1519453.
75.
Amir, S. Rethinking Design Policy in the Third World. Design Issues 20, 68–75 (2004).
76.
Komarova, M. & McKnight, M. ‘We Are Watching You Too’: Reflections on Doing Visual Research in a Contested City. Sociological Research Online 18, (2013).
77.
Rose, G. Situating knowledges: positionality, reflexivities and other tactics. Progress in Human Geography 21, 305–320 (1997).
78.
Flowerdew, R. & Martin, D. Methods in human geography: a guide for students doing a research project. (Prentice Hall, 2005).
79.
Hamdi, N. Chapter 12. Insiders Out and Outsiders: Practical wisdom and the co-Production of Knowledge. in The spacemaker’s guide to big change: design and improvisation in development practice vol. Earthscan tools for community planning (Routledge, 2014).
80.
Mitlin, D. & Bartlett, S. Editorial: Co-production – key ideas. Environment and Urbanization 30, 355–366 (2018).
81.
Sarkissian, W. and Bunjamin-Mau, W. et al. Designing and managing a workshop. in SpeakOut: the step-by-step guide to SpeakOuts and community workshops vol. Tools for community planning (Earthscan, 2009).
82.
Saba Golchehr. Data-driven design for civic participation : Introducing digital methods for on-going civic engagement for design in public space. 56–70 doi:10.4324/9781315110332-5.
83.
Burgess, J., Harrison, C. M. & Limb, M. People, Parks and the Urban Green: A Study of Popular Meanings and Values for Open Spaces in the City. Urban Studies 25, 455–473 (1988).
84.
We Drew What We Imagined: Participatory Mapping Performance, and Arts of Landscape Making, • Sletto, B. I., (2009).
85.
Freire, P. & Bergman Ramos, M. Pedagogy of the oppressed. (Penguin Books, 1996).
86.
Haraway, D. Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective. Feminist Studies 14, (1988).
87.
SARA KINDON. Participatory Action Research: Origins, approaches and methods. 35–44 doi:10.4324/9780203933671-13.
88.
Jeremy Till. Imperfect ethics. in Architecture depends 171–187 (MIT Press, 2009).
89.
Miessen, M. Collaboration and the conflictual, Published in The nightmare of participation - p. 91-104. in (Sternberg Press, 2010).
90.
Cooke, B. & Kothari, U. The case for participation as tyranny. in Participation: the new tyranny? 1–15 (Zed Books, 2001).
91.
Mouffe, C. Agonistics: thinking the world politically. (Verso, 2013).
92.
Kaminer, T. Theories of participation, theories of contestation. in The efficacy of architecture: political contestation and agency (Routledge, 2017).
93.
Moser, C. O. N. Community participation in urban projects in the Third World. Progress in Planning 32, 71–133 (1989).
94.
Sandercock, L. Re/presenting Planning’s Histories. in Towards cosmopolis: planning for multicultural cities 33–54 (John Wiley & Sons, 1998).
95.
Yacobi, H. Social Exclusion, Housing Environment and Tolerant Planning: The Case of the Jahelin Bedouin Tribe. Hagar - International Social Science Review. 69-84. Hagar international social science review = Hājir 5, 69–83 (2004).
96.
Abu-Orf, H. Is planning possible in cities divided by violent conflict? International Development Planning Review 33, 321–342 (2011).
97.
Bower, R. Architecture and space re-imagined: learning from the difference, multiplicity, and otherness of development practice. vol. Routledge Research in Place, Space and Politics (Routledge, 2017).
98.
Hamdi, N. & Goethert, R. Chapter 2. Action Planning In Theory. in Action planning for cities: a guide to community practice 23–59 (John Wiley, 1997).
99.
Hamdi, N. Chapter 3. Deciding how to decide. in The spacemaker’s guide to big change: design and improvisation in development practice vol. Earthscan tools for community planning (Routledge, 2014).
100.
Hamdi, N. Chapter 6. In Search of a Community and Structure of Place. in Small change: the art of practice and the limits of planning in cities 58–72 (Earthscan, 2004).
101.
Luck, R. Learning to talk to users in participatory design situations. Design Studies 28, 217–242 (2007).
102.
Environment and Urbanization.
103.
Camillo Boano and William Hunter. Collaboration and the conflictual. in The nightmare of participation: [crossbench praxis as a mode of criticality] 91–104 (Sternberg Press, 2010).
104.
Hamdi, N. Chapter 7. Participation in practice. in The spacemaker’s guide to big change: design and improvisation in development practice vol. Earthscan tools for community planning (Routledge, 2014).
105.
Petrescu, D. & Chiles, P. Agency: alternative practices and alternative worlds. Architectural Research Quarterly 13, (2009).
106.
Hamdi, N. Chapter 8. PEAS and the Sociable Side of Practice. in The placemaker’s guide to building community vol. Tools for community planning 141–152 (Earthscan, 2010).
107.
Sandercock, L. & Attili, G. Digital Ethnography as Planning Praxis: An Experiment with Film as Social Research, Community Engagement and Policy Dialogue. Planning Theory & Practice 11, 23–45 (2010).
108.
Hamdi, N. Chapter 9. Reasoning to Scale. in The placemaker’s guide to building community vol. Tools for community planning 160–153 (Earthscan, 2010).
109.
Hamdi, N. Chapter 11. Governance and networks: organizing from inside out. in Small change: the art of practice and the limits of planning in cities 107–115 (Earthscan, 2004).
110.
Environment and Urbanization.
111.
Mitlin, D. & Thompson, J. Participatory approaches in urban areas: strengthening civil society or        reinforcing the status quo? Environment and Urbanization 7, 231–250 (1995).
112.
Petrescu, D. & Petcou, C. Tactics for a Transgressive Practice. Architectural Design 83, 58–65 (2013).
113.
Mitlin, D. & Satterthwaite, D. Empowering squatter citizen: local government, civil society and urban poverty reduction. (Earthscan, 2004).
114.
Cowan, R. Placecheck: a user’s guide. . (2001).
115.
Robinson, J. White women researching/representing ‘others’: from antiapartheid to postcolonialism? in Writing women and space: colonial and postcolonial geographies vol. Mappings 197–228 (Guilford Press, 1994).
116.
Foucault, M. The eye of power. in Power/knowledge: selected interviews and other writings, 1972-1977 146–165 (Longman, 1980).
117.
Burgess, R., Carmona, M. & Kolstee, T. Contemporary policies for enablement and participation : a critical review. in The challenge of sustainable cities: neoliberalism and urban strategies in developing countries 138–162 (Zed, 1997).
118.
D. M. Petrescu & K. Trogal. The social (re)production of Architecture in ‘crisis-riddled’ times. in The social (re)production of architecture: politics, values and actions in contemporary practice (eds. Petrescu, D. & Trogal, K.) (Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 2017). doi:10.4324/9781315717180.
119.
Jenkins, P., Smith, H. & Wang, Y. P. Post-1990 issues in planning and housing. in Planning and housing in the rapidly urbanising world vol. Housing, planning, and design series 178–203 (Routledge, 2007).
120.
Cooke, B. & Kothari, U. The case for participation as tyranny. in Participation: the new tyranny? 1–15 (Zed Books, 2001).
121.
Blunt, A. & Dowling, R. M. Setting up home: an introduction. in Home vol. Key ideas in geography 1–31 (Routledge, 2006).
122.
Lane, B. M. What is home? in Housing and dwelling: perspectives on modern domestic architecture 50–73 (Routledge, 2007).
123.
Coole, D. Experiencing Discourse: Corporeal Communicators and the Embodiment of Power. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 9, 413–433 (2007).
124.
Kumar, S. Conceptual specifications. in Methods for community participation: a complete guide for practitioners 23–52 (Practical Action Publishing, 2002).
125.
Hamdi, N. Small change: the art of practice and the limits of planning in cities. (Earthscan, 2004).
126.
Sundberg, J. Looking for the critical geographer, or why bodies and geographies matter to the emergence of critical geographies of Latin America. Geoforum 36, 17–28 (2005).
127.
Swyngedouw, E. & Wilson, J. Insurgent architects and the spectral return of the urban political. in Planning against the political: democratic deficits in European territorial governance (eds. Metzger, J., Allmendinger, P. & Oosterlynck, S.) 215–225 (Routledge, 2015).
128.
Kindon, S. L., Pain, R. & Kesby, M. Participatory action research: origins, approaches and methods. in Participatory action research approaches and methods: connecting people, participation and place vol. Routledge studies in human geography 9–18 (Routledge, 2007).
129.
Patel, S. & Mitlin, D. Grassroots-driven development: The alliance of SPARC, the National Slum Dwellers Federation and Mahila Milan. in Empowering squatter citizen: local government, civil society and urban poverty reduction 216–241 (Earthscan, 2004).
130.
Wates, N. General principles A-Z. in Community planning handbook : how people can shape their cities, towns and villages in any part of the world 11–21 (Earthscan Publications Ltd, 2000).
131.
Frediani, A. A. & Boano, C. Processes for just products: the capability space of participatory design. in The capability approach, technology and design vol. Philosophy of engineering and technology 203–222 (Springer, 2012).
132.
Zetter, R. Market enablement or sustainable development : the conflicting paradigms of urbanization. in Planning in cities: sustainability and growth in the developing world vol. Urban management series 31–42 (ITDG, 2002).
133.
Cornwall, A. & Coelho, V. S. P. Spaces for change?: The politics of participation in new democratic arenas. in Spaces for change?: the politics of citizen participation in new democratic arenas vol. Claiming citizenship 1–29 (Zed, 2007).
134.
Glass, J. Facing the Future by Designing in Resilience: An Architectural Perspective. in Hazards and the built environment: attaining built-in resilience 172–188 (Routledge, 2008).
135.
Seymour, W. Exhuming the Body: Revisiting the Role of the Visible Body in Ethnographic Research. Qualitative Health Research 17, 1188–1197 (2007).
136.
Ramirez, R. Integrated Informality in the Barrios of Havana. in Rethinking the informal city: critical perspectives from Latin America vol. Remapping cultural history 137–162 (Berghahn Books, 2010).
137.
Turner, J. F. C. Issues in Self-Help and Self-Managed Housing. in Self-help housing: a critique 99–113 (Mansell, 1982).
138.
Madanipour, A. Introduction. in Whose public space?: international case studies in urban design and development 1–15 (Routledge, 2010).
139.
Dovey, K. Home and homelessness. in Home environments vol. Human behavior and environment 33–64 (Plenum Press, 1985).
140.
Eyben, R., Harris, C. & Pettit, J. Introduction: Exploring Power for Change. IDS Bulletin 37, 1–10 (2006).
141.
Till, J. Imperfect ethics. in Architecture depends 171–187 (MIT Press, 2009).
142.
Schuermans, N. & Newton, C. Being a young and foreign researcher in South Africa: Towards a postcolonial dialogue. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography 33, 295–300 (2012).
143.
Progress in Human Geography.